Re: Not for me...
Cool - send it to me :)
633 publicly visible posts • joined 23 Jun 2011
I think you'll find that *Baroness* Dido Harding, if you please, is a member of the Government's Business Advisory Group, so no doubt we can look forward to a great many more of these scandals in the future.
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/business-advisory-group
Her husband John Penrose MP is Lord Commissioner (HM Treasury) (Whip) and also Parliamentary Secretary to the Cabinet Office.
So I don't think she's going to be coming in for any criticism from anyone who matters - a group that excludes any TalkTalk customers.
I think you'll find that *Baroness* Dido Harding, if you please, is a member of the Government's Business Advisory Group, so no doubt we can look forward to a great many more of these scandals in the future.
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/business-advisory-group
Her husband John Penrose MP is Lord Commissioner (HM Treasury) (Whip) and also Parliamentary Secretary to the Cabinet Office.
So I don't think she's going to be coming in for any criticism from anyone who matters - a group that excludes any TalkTalk customers.
Maybe. But as previously noted:
Baroness Dido Harding is a member of the Government's Business Advisory Group advising David Cameron and her husband John Penrose MP is Lord Commissioner (HM Treasury) (Whip) and also Parliamentary Secretary to the Cabinet Office.
Besides which all she has to do is what everyone if the examples of Rebekah Brooks and Rupert Murdoch are anything to go by; just sit there and lie. "I was at lunch that day, I don't understand what bytes we have" should do it.
I think you'll find that *Baroness* Dido Harding, if you please, is a member of the Government's Business Advisory Group, and her husband John Penrose MP is Lord Commissioner (HM Treasury) (Whip) and also Parliamentary Secretary to the Cabinet Office.
She's not going anywhere.
Compared to the other politicians on offer of *every* party, almost anyone looks left wing.
You are seeing the return of the previously disaffected middle ground. The 2,000,000 who marched against the Iraq war and the 3,000,000 who couldn't make it that day, and were ignored.
We have had nobody to vote for in years. Finally somebody is standing up and saying "enough" to all the lying cheating money grubbing scumbags who make the sick, unployed, mentally ill and disabled pay for their greed.
Corbyn may not have everything right. But he is a hell of a lot righter on things that I think are truly important. Decency, honesty, supporting the weak and enabling the majority.
He may not be perfect but like the grateful dead - it's not that he's the best at what he does. He's the only one who does what he does.
So he gets my vote.
Well not according to him. In an interview in the ft - a paper I trust far more than govt lapdog murcdoch's rag - he makes it quite clear he is no such thing.
This entire article is rubbish.
Economics is far too complex for anyone to fully master - except Worstall, brain of the millennium and all round egghead supreme ? I think not.
The statement "Just about everything he believes about economics is wrong on the simple grounds that, in my view, he doesn't actually understand the subject."
"In my view".
And my view is very different. Your whole article is actually founded on your own prejudices. It is the curse of the truly egregious that they are unable to discern when they are just plain wrong.
that's the only thing he cares about. Why the hell is the reg helping him campaign anyway?
He's a Tory, he should leave it to "the market" and stop pretending he gives a stuff.
As far as I'm concerned black cabs can survive as a £20-a-go tourist thing or whatever. Who really cares anyway?
the "massive buy to let market" is fuelled by a £14,000,000,000 government subsidy, the deliberate lack of social housing and the fact that 40% of the council houses sold off are now in the hands of private landlords, many of them the same ministers and their immediate families who oversaw the sell-off.
It's a national disgrace.
Yes, the line about an enormous desire to spend other people's money was a good one. Far better to simply give other people's money away to the banking sector, the American and other offshore corporates, the foreign governments who own our railways and power generators, in the form of tax breaks and subsidies.
After all it's the poor, the sick and the disabled who are paying for all this, and the brilliant thing is the more of our money the Tories give away to their friends, the more poor there are to foot the bill! We have 4,000,000 children living in poverty in this country. Hilarious! And with the new Working Tax Credit cuts taking up to £1,000 a year from the poorest working families in the UK we will have even more. Trebles all round !
It really is like the gift that keeps on giving, after all if the rich paid their way we'd one day run out of rich people like has already happened never.
"Sharing a Ginsters cheese and onion pasty from the microwave were Billy Bragg and Brian Eno. In the corner, revolutionary film maker Ken Loach was petting his whippet as an admiring Jeremy Hardy chuckled." made me do a proper nose snort, however! Ew!
"full of women who actively support and engage in child abuse "
Oh really?
Citation needed.
The only person saying it is "painted as a place full of "victims" is you. Typical Internet trollery, dealing in oversimplified absolutes, when we all know the world is not like that. I smell a rat.
I have to agree about the "security" though. It is clearly very poor. They seem to treat the site like it's a cute hobby when the reality is that it's a multi-million pound commercial organisation.
I think some of their sponsors are going to be mightily pissed off with them over the release of emails etc.
@mark 65
I know at least one highly technically competent, devious, abusive and violent person who is easily capable of hacking websites, social media, databases et al.
A lot may be the "thickos" you so patronisingly describe, but you should never underestimate "the enemy". It only takes one who knows what they are doing.
As such, apart from the run-of-the-mill stuff it provides self-help, support and advice to women suffering or escaping abusive relationships or trying to get the financial support from their ex's and so on. There is therefore a hard-core of men who object to this support and see helping women escape from them as a threat to themselves.
They have an axe to grind and punishment to administer.
IME once you get into the habit of finding everything by typing the first few letters into a search box and accepting what is usually the top hit, you never go back, especially when the box can be opened with a key combo instead of a mouse click, which makes it even faster than hunting with a mouse (hate the things anyway).
Even though I usually can remember where it is, this approach removes the need to have to bother to remember, so after a while you do forget through lack of use of the knowledge, which is either a vicious circle or a self-fulfilling prophecy depending on your POV. Jury's out IMO as I suppose I have the capacity to remember other stuff instead.
The trouble for me is that I really like the watch I've already got, and have had for years. If I replaced it with something else it would be - well - something else. I've actually got several watches... no idea why really, as I only ever wear this one!
Apple is going to make - is already making - an incredible success out of an idea that many have tried and failed to do before, and they will "revolutionize" payments and maximise their revenue and user base AND multiply diverse device ownership in almost no time at all - a trick they have literally NEVER managed to pull off in the past.