
You accidentally put "Java" and "powerful" in the same sentence.
375 publicly visible posts • joined 2 Jun 2011
On an unrelated note, a Chinese deep space ship is spying on the American spying shuttle.
In a recent meeting, the ministries of defense of both countries were congratulating each others, and said "more stuff to come", at the great pleasure of representatives of the armament industry. Soon after, second hand ministries like education, health, ect... were announcing severe budget cuts, and a bank financial crisis du to corruption and bad management was subtly turned into a State payment fault into some never-heard-of countries across Europe, wich resulted in massive cash backs for banks disguised in "ok-let's-erase-a-100-billions-aren't-we-nice?" operation; wich in turn heavily finance the armament industry.
Or maybe it's just me.
You try to jump from legal ground to moral ground.
As your example show, there is no absolute moral. It is therefore useless to argue on the subject.
And as a matter of fact, i've never heard of denunciation lists of young girls clients at that time.
Pretty much like you didn't heard of sexual misconduct of Pharao in ancient Egypt, still he was having sex with his mother and sisters.
Just out of curiosity, what would you expect from a change from IIS to Apache?
IIS and Apache are the worst performing web servers available.
Sure one is open source but frankly did you even *tried* to look at the actual code? If yes, did you understood it all? If no, do you even remotly know someone who did?
Here are two links (for impartiality) to performing web servers:
http://gwan.com/
http://www.lighttpd.net/
Cheers
I do software dev on a netbook, decompile dlls with IDA, write and compile code (C with VS2008), check hex files with PSPad and it works perfectly fine. I enjoy 6 to 8 hour of *work* on the go.
I paid my dual core 270 euros.
It has an integrated SD card reader and 250Go HDD.
I'll give you credit that i didn't drop it on the floor so i won't argue on sturdiness. For the rest...
I just decide myself to buy a netbook a month ago after long hesitation.
I feared it to be too small to use it and too slow to run the programs i need.
I finally got one with 1.6Ghz dual Atom and 1Go RAM.
I run mostly VS2008, IDA-pro and PSPad, all altogether. So basically, write code, compile, disassemble.
It run like a charms and the screen is really not a problem. I got used to it pretty quick, even using a 23" monitor at my desktop.
The most unpleasent thing so far is browsing the net. Looks like today browsers need huge amount of RAM and CPU cycles.
So all in all, i don't feel like owning a netbook, but a very handy small yet powerful computer (ultrabook?) to work on the go (and comes with unbeatable battery life: 6 to 8 hours *working*, depending mainly on screen luminosity).
Well spent money really.
I mostly agree with you but I am quite sure Microsoft can't afford to let native code die.
MS marketing put strong emphasis on C# and .NET of course, but we all certainly remember that Microsoft have a long tradition in making languages and let them die for something new (hey they sell solutions, so it is to be expected).
A lot of software developement is done in native code for its independant technology, power, and availabillity.
Letting native code die would be like blowing off one and half of Microsoft two legs.