* Posts by Rampant Spaniel

1813 publicly visible posts • joined 26 May 2011

Headmaster freezes schoolkids for Gaia

Rampant Spaniel

Having spent the first 20 odd years of my life in North Yorkshire I am aware of that. I'm also aware plenty of these kids go from a centrally heated home in a warm car to a heated school.

Real world hardship? I doubt it :-) Minor inconvieniences perhaps. Seriously, what harm became them?

I don't think so much that the cold alone would teach them anything, although the ones glued to their games consoles may learn a little, but the wider implications of no power hopefully would have helped them realise how many luxuries they take for granted. Growing up in an isolated valley meant powercuts, sometimes for extended periods. Forget broadband, we could lose power and phone and roads, loosing luxuries, even for a short time helps teach people to think, to be creative in finding solutions. We didn't exactly have to chip the ice off the cows each morning but you had to bodge some interesting solutions for feeding yourself and animals and getting around was fun.

It's a challenge and kids need challenges (mine do or they get bored and things go bad fast) to help them practice skills and build confidence. I don't advocate sending them down the pits or putting them in harms way, but a single day without power is hardly likely to harm them is it?

People over protect kids, they're resiliant little buggers who thrive on challenges, coddling them and shielding them from challenging situations breeds mediocrity and a lack of ambition. Great if you want a generation of fryers for the golden arches, not so great if you want to be a country of 'sunrise industries' (I think that's the current phrase).

Rampant Spaniel

13/16 is correct but in this instance it is unlikely to be illegal. When the temperature falls below the thermal comfort level (which varies significantly) AND an employee complains or becomes ill the employer is required to review the situation and potentially take steps to redress, however those steps can be to increase clothing. One day, with notice and warning to wear appropriate PPE wouldn't constitute breaking the law.

The mechanics of actually sorting it out generally take months if not seasons. Just getting an employer to agree on how to measure the temperature and assess thermal comfort levels is a minefield. Many jobs require working in sub 13 deg c temperatures, they wear a coat. The kids are unlikely to die and will probably feel fine with some extra clothes.

Rampant Spaniel

re minimum temperature

I believe there is a minimum (infact one for manual labour 13deg c and one for desk cuddling jobs 16deg c) but below this you are not entitled to go home, just to complain and be told to dress more sensibly. I don't believe there is a maximum temp which can be crap in summer when some granny in the office turns the heaters on when its 35 outside already but they are supposed to try and keep it sensible. Exceptions are made for jobs like bakeries and cold rooms where extremes are part of the job.

Given it was one day and that they were warned to dress warmly I doubt there's a H&S issue. Given the last two H&S blokes I met were sat smoking on top of a propane tank at Low wray campsite I'm inclined to ignore it anyway :-)

Rampant Spaniel

So theres two questions here

1- will it do them any harm? I doubt it. I remember playing rugby in a foot of snow for several months of the year growing up in North Yorkshire (we loved it btw huge amounts of fun). I worked on a farm on weekends and dove for lobsters in the north sea, both of which are fairly cold during winter. A reasonable level of cold won't hurt healthy people. Very few kids of my school year (I'm 30) had asthma or allergies, however my younger brothers year was full of xbox kids allergic to everything who died instantly when exposed to temperatures under 20C. Some experts believe there is a link between warmer homes and asthma and allergies.

2- Will they learn anything from it? I am lucky enough to live in Hawai'i these days which is contentiously part of the USA, a first world country. Our island gets its power from burning oil, poor people and golfers. Being an island power goes out fairly often. We do without, this is life! About once a year Chile or Japan sends us a 20ft high wave and we have to live in our car up a volcano for 12 hours. We get on with it. Kids need to experience a little hardship to understand what they have and to stop them taking things for granted. It will also give them the confidence to take things in their stride when things do go wrong, which they always will at some point.

I got a puncture on the way to a meeting for work, my coworker started to call the AA, he had no idea how easy it was to change a tyre. We should give these kids a chance to be challenged otherwise they won't be able to cope when life throws something at them! The school should be applauded for their actions.

ICO smacks Welsh council with record £130k fine

Rampant Spaniel

No doubt some manager will get a payrise for fixing the situation. I agree entirely that fining local taxpayers is wrong. Perhaps taking the fine from managements bonus and golf junket fund would be more appropriate?

They really need to make people responsible directly for their actions (in respect to staff) and for the management for allowing for these situations to occur.

If you aren't responsible when things go wrong you cannot claim credit when they go right (and give yourself a huge bonus).

As mentioned above pin protected print jobs are a great idea. Not ideal if you are in a hurry but better to get a little right then a lot wrong!

Groupon shares plunge: Drain in sight

Rampant Spaniel

yet again

A bunch of bankers have pissed a load of our pension funds up the wall motivated by greed! Any halfwit could see that such sky high valuations were absolute fantasy. I can understand Apple's valuation, I can even accept that Facebook is worth a decent amount (although not 100bn), but the likes of Twitter, groupon et al, it just isn't there. There has to be a scaleable revenue stream, preferably more than one. Being popular or novel is not enough by itself. FB is finally making coin and has huge market share. I'm pretty sure I wouldn't rate it as being on a par with Ford or Intel, but surely these xxbn ipo's require at least some hint of a significant income.

British Library defends flogging of orphaned artwork

Rampant Spaniel

Or we have a sensible system that respects content creators. With photography we are not talking about life and death, this isn't drug patents. We are talking about photographer who don't want their work to be used for things they don't agree with (how would you like your work to be used by the BNP or Republican Party against your wishes) or in a manner that reflects badly on your work (I.e. poorly reproduced).

This is nothing more than a cynical rights grab. Every important event from Noah's balls dropping is captured in woodcut, oil, photo, video etc and can be had for a pretty damn reasonable cost from the likes of getty. The problem is media companies think why pay $xx-$xxx when you can legally take it for free and hope nobody notices and hey if they do the penalty is less than you'd have paid in the first place.

It's not like we withhold use in the vast majority of cases or charge high fees, stock is cheaper now than it ever has been. They just want free.

Rampant Spaniel

Thieving gits.

As a photographer I have a huge issue with the concept that publishers can use my work without my consent after only a trivial attempt to contact me. Work is easily orphaned these days. People taking shots in galleries, screen scrapes, scans of albums, FB etc

As a creator I have a right to control how and if my work is used by others (outside of fair use). If I desire my work not be used by a company I do not like or for a cause I disagree with I should have the right to control that. The concept that I should be forced to sell my work to anyone who wants it or forgo any right to protection is bonkers.

This is simply a bunch of talentless muppets who want more for less, ideally free if they can wangle it) and no consequences. In any other industry it wouldn't be tolerated but photography is not a rich business and there are far too many 'one person bands', so we risk being trampled by large companies with deep pockets.

Dragon Bannatyne threatens to break arms of 'Russian' bloke

Rampant Spaniel

Special Sprinkles

on those Glasgow icies? Sounds like the vans round Manchester. Charlie with your choc ice!

Irrespective of his past, his daughter doesn't even deserve the worry from a threat. As a father I'd want to do the same although I would be more discrete. I hope the CPS don't do anything. It's an entirely understandable reaction.

Ofcom says no to web-blocking

Rampant Spaniel

As a photographer

they can go take a flying .....

Student suspended for posting random satire on YouTube

Rampant Spaniel
FAIL

Pompous Dinosaurs.

Seriously, in general no contract is valid if it is fundamentally unfair right? Even in Canada. This guy has some talent which could see him go far. Instead of nurturing it and maybe having an alumni go on to create the next "kids in the halls" they have made themselves a laughing stock worldwide. I don't think KITH actually caused any squished heads either :(

Epic fail from a bunch of pompous dinosaurs.

$8.5bn Skype goes titsup again - including website

Rampant Spaniel
Thumb Up

As a long time skype user

It actually isn't bad. I have yet to ever not be able to make a call when I want to, its simple enough to video conference with grand parents in different countries (for free as well). I can also sit on the beach in Hawaii and use my sprint data plan to call blighty for a relatively small yearly fee.

Whilst it isn't perfect it is acceptable. I used broadvoice's service years ago and it was terrible and I paid considerably more for it to boot.

I have no idea what to expect from MS buying skype, perhaps a ribbon interface to screw it up? As long as it continues along as a fairly reliable cheap way to not pay stupid international calling fees, have simple video conferencing and granny proof 'other country' skype in numbers all is good :)

Drink 8 bottles of wine, you'll be unharmed if hit by Mike Tyson

Rampant Spaniel
Pirate

But does it protect your ears??

I guess if you hit him with the bottles?