Re: Payment methods
I tried that on something, I forget what and it somehow worked out it was an expiring virtual card and it told me to think again.
343 publicly visible posts • joined 2 May 2011
"developers try to reserve power for projects that may never be built"
As Lee D said.
At the very least lodge a bond to cover 5-10 years of their estimated power consumption so if they end up ditching the project the power companies (or more likely the taxpayer aren't on the hook for it), a bit like landfill or mining restoration bonds to allow reverting sites to nature which avoids the companies pinky promise to do but then going mysteriously bankrupt at the last minute.
No doubt the developers can insure or hedge themselves for it.
I suppose in theory it allows those who are experienced in running Azure with scripting and so on and so forth to apply that to on-prem without re-inventing the wheel.
But the kind of people who want this presumably already have all the experience built up of doing this on-prem anyway. Possibly in a clunkier way, but with the added benefit they can pick their own hardware and don't have to choose it from an MS approved list.
I think a lot of European universities have rubbed their hands in glee and offered scientists who's project budget funding has been cut in US massive bonuses and help to immigrate with the respective govts. falling over themselves to help the process along.
Not sure where the UK is on the scale though, think I remember seeing that Italy was making a lot of the running in that respect.
MS5750 was always explained to me as you can get away with anything as long as it follows a documented process.
If that process says the box must be dropped 5 times between end of production and being loaded onto the delivery lorry that's completely fine as long as it is always 5 times exactly.
I guess they’ve improved it then. I stayed there many years ago because it was just across the road from the Commvault offices for training.
Small and cramped room with a bathroom that was black, on black, on black with weak lights. Thought I was in Hotblack Desiato’s ship almost to carry on the Mostly Harmless theme.
There was barely enough light to shave.
Glad the company was paying but whatever they paid it wasn’t worth it.
Until we have matter replicators a la Star Trek we'll always need fossil fuels.
Vast majority of crude oil is obviously burnt but rest goes for agriculture, pharmaceuticals etc.
Reducing the cost of that feed stock since the proportion of it available will rise as transport proportion falls might have positive benefits.
I presume with all the different areas that are covered by the various sub-organisations within Defra that there are dozens of apps just for interacting with farmers let alone the water companies, food safety etc.
If they are all browser based then of course the client should really be able to be anything but it can't be taken as read.
I've met Murray briefly.
Actually seemed a reasonable, pretty switched on guy.
My father knew him a lot better and liked him, he normally hated all politicians, especially Labour and the SNP.
Of course as a minister he has to hold his nose and the govt. line at the same time but that's the price you pay if you want to sit at the big table on the extra ministerial salary.
I think most MP's have their hypocrisy detectors and embarrassment factor invisibly removed the moment they walk through the doors of parliament, or maybe it happens when they put the papers in to stand for election.
Sharing your clearance, specific projects for clients etc. even if you only have SC is a definite no-no. Even worse if holding DV.
Annual security training will always say that as well.
"Since I hold DV I am working extensively with 'XYZ' on implementing 'ABC version X' - Not fine
"Recently completed a rollout of 'Product X' for Govt. dept Y" - Not fine
"I have implemented 'X' across a wide range of clients including detailed architecture and design etc. etc. - Fine (As long as it's a common product)
Obviously bad actors could put 2 and 2 together if you work for the usual suspects and say you are heavily involved in M365 or security software but shouldn't be presented on a plate.
I believe many US rural fire services operate a subscription only model and will only fight a fire from a non-subscriber as far as it might impact a subscribing property.
Likewise if a county fire service turns out to a call but determines the property is just over the county line and there is no-mutual aid agreement they might just let it burn
I think if if was an American state taxpayer I'd be asking them to give a subsidy for datacentres not to be built in my state.
Brings very few permanent jobs, massive building disruption, uses crazy amounts of water and drives up the price of electricity in the region.
No doubt the states and communities get some form of land use tax but very unlikely to make up for the subsidy in the short-medium term.
As an interim step in the same Exchange organization that's perfectly fine since there was no direct upgrade path from 2003 to 2013.
But if they then stuck on 2010 rather than doing another migration to 2013 or going to O365 as was that's a different story.
I know there are orgs out there still using Exchange 2003, Fujitsu posted a job advert a few weeks ago looking for someone experienced in 2003 and X400 routing.
Fun, fun.
Will be interesting to see if they actually followed the correct rules for firing all these people.
Even 'gross misconduct' will have specific requirements that they'll have to follow usually.
Wouldn't surprise me if it's US managers who don't realise the UK isn't the US.
Have a manager here who comes across from the US regularly.
He did a meet and greet and said he couldn't believe that HR had said he couldn't just tap people on the should accompanied by security and fire them on the spot. I guess he had just enough nous to ask the question beforehand.
Seemed quite disappointed by it which tells you all you need to know about US employment practises I think.
I still don't understand why anyone wanting an iPhone wouldn't simply get the interest free option from Apple themselves over 2 years?
Not sure if you still must get AppleCare but I know it's a separate payment these days.
Are combination airtime and phone contracts so much cheaper?
I had all this to hand before because I had a SamKnows box monitoring the BT connection on behalf of Ofcom and giving me service reports. On the very few occasions I had a problem and mentioned that I had one of these so I knew they were lying and could prove it things mysteriously fixed themselves rather quickly.
Unfortunately the SamKnows box is no more because they've apparently rolled the functionality into the normal routers.
What would you suggest for monitoring the connection?
I have never understood where that 3.9% came from and why they were allowed to make it 'inflation + 3.9%' rather than 'inflation or 3.9% whichever is higher'.
Latter obviously isn't great either but at least makes more sense.
I seem to recall reading, probably here, that some of the telco's, ISP's etc. would also base the total rise on the 'non-discounted' contract price so you'd be thinking the rise would be say 10% on £10 a month but was actually 10% on £30 a month because you were getting a £20pm 'discount'. Shady practise.
No doubt central govt. neglected to include IT integration costs into their careful budgeting that declared costs would be lower overall.
And also no doubt that they will make the wrong staff redundant when they merge them so all the knowledge of how things actually work will slip away and they will be completely surprised when the council's end up with Birmingham style IT cost overruns.
Very similar to the SNP declaring back in 2014 that de-segregating all the UK level governmental stuff and moving it to Scottish control would only cost about £50m.
I think that was about the only definitive cost they gave to cover going independent.
Even back then that would have bought about a quarter of a datacentre.
And they still haven't even managed to move the entirety of the DWP functions that they are allowed to to Social Care Scotland yet.
Indeed. Recently read the SEC reporting form, a 10K perhaps for our parent company in US.
If firm was 100 pages the sections on the board and their remuneration was about 70 pages of that. CEO gets an allowance of $60k per year just to fill out his tax returns, no doubt because of all the share options. His total remuneration, upwards of $20m including RSU’s. These guys just live on another planet.
We must be similar ages.
Likewise had one but never found it very useful for anything that I recall.
I think overall digital ID is the usual problem with anything that gets introduced to cover a, b, c.
A, b and c could be useful in the short or long term but then a little while down the road it gets extended to D. Obviously they send you an email with the new t&c, but very few read those much less opt out because A and B are still so useful. Then E is added with a couple of terms that, if you read them, would make one a bit nervous. Then a little while later we get to Z with page 1332 of the T&C’s, obviously the first few goes won Plain English awards but then they stopped submitting them for some reason, that in 6 pt text inside a massive paragraph says “we own your body and soul and that of all your successors until the end of time”.
Obviously that’s a little dramatic but never met a govt yet who didn’t like to “expand” things since “we’ve already spent so much money on this wouldn’t it be useful if it could also….” .
For example Glasgow council put cameras in to enforce ULEZ. Funnily enough since they know that nearly every vehicle would eventually be compliant in the next few years they’ve suddenly ‘discovered’ that they could use the same cameras for a congestion charging zone and are making plans for it. Funny that.
Is already doing some of this via the back door.
All kids starting high school are automatically signed up for it and get a Young Scot card which allows them free bus travel etc. and as proof of age.
This is actually a national entitlement card under a different name.
It's actually run by local councils, they can do different things with it like add a tag for disabled bus pass etc., but no doubt there is a national spine database somewhere.
In saying that a Young Scot card holder does not automatically get an NEC when they reach the age limit but no reason they couldn't.
Can also be used as ID for voting in UK elections.
Interestingly it does NOT require a passport or driving license to apply for, just birth certificate, NHS medical card etc.
Banks don't seem to count it as an accepted form of photo ID, however my father being the obstreperous bugger that he was forced Nationwide to accept it as such when he wanted to open a new account and they wanted to go through the money laundering malarkey.
Pointed out that it was issued on behalf of the Scottish Government therefore it was govt. ID. And by the way he had £600k spread across his existing accounts due to a recent house sale, RBS was next door and did they have the forms available so he could request closure of all his accounts. Funnily enough it suddenly became acceptable.
He didn't have a photo driving license at the time since he hadn't moved house in 30 years, hadn't reached 70 and never had a passport.
I believe their policy at the time only mentioned government issued photo ID rather than being explicit as to what was acceptable so they were hoist on their own petard.
What really annoys me if I'm turning into or out of a road and giving way to a pedestrian as I should most of the time they don't even see me motioning them to cross.
Nose buried in phones and not paying any attention, always seem surprised when they look up and there is a car there waiting for them to cross.
And I'm pretty patient about such things, usually, although not according to my wife.
So I've wasted time trying to obey the law and be helpful and half the time missed a slot to turn out of the road so have to sit there and fume.
Funnily enough I was playing this game last night. 20 year customer.
My contract had expired in May or something but I hadn't set a reminder and was busy so didn't notice their emails.
For Signature, HD, Multiroom and Netflix on Sky Q it shot up to £66 or thereabouts.
They sent me a letter very generously offering to let me recontract for £64, couple of pounds off.
Called them and most they would come down to was £55 when I knew others were getting same for £25-30 pm so cancelled.
Offered me the Sky Stream but I didn't fancy it compared to the Sky Q box.
Needed to send Q and mini box back by 20/9 so finally got around to calling them again last night.
First operator tried to push broadband on me which I specifically said I didn't want.
Tried to transfer me to someone else, got cut off.
Called them back later - Offered signature, multiroom and Netflix for £44.50. No chance.
Asked about Sky Q Essentials (ability to record free-to-air) so she transferred me to another dept. which turned out to be the real retentions team.
Actually someone in UK this time and with no massive call centre background noise.
He tried his best to get my original requirements for a decent price but computer said no and couldn't get below the £44.50 level (probably because I didn't want cinema and sport).
He actually got quite irate with his system and Sky corporate about it.
So have taken out Sky Q Essentials with Mini box as a holding thing with a months cooling off period on a contract. (Can't do rolling monthly if discounted for reasons apparently)
£7 for main box and £8 for mini which is just crazy for the latter. Mini is probably costing me that in power actually it runs so hot.
I'll probably still cancel again anyway, I'd bought myself an Apple TV box for main TV and Firestick for bedroom TV in the interim so really just need NowTV for the main Sky channels.
Confused. (And not in any way an MS defender.)
I tried clicking through to the article within the article about Microsoft being in possession of encryption keys but it seems to be mentioning a 3rd party rather than MS themselves in the headline.
I didn't read full article because I didn't want to sign up for yet another news site to spam me with constant mails.
I also thought customers could supply their own encryption keys rather than using MS provided ones.
I've not looked at the nitty gritty of that though so I'm presuming there is some wriggle that MS could do to access data outside of the Customer Lockbox idea.
Opex always wins over Capex I guess.
And removing local admins and people who know what they are doing is always a good idea apparently.
Some people just can't see the issue even with a big clue bat or a cattle prod.
There was a thing I heard about and was asked to comment on.
Local installation of Exchange, SharePoint, Skype at one end of a satellite link with about 800-1024ms latency at most times.
Everybody else in company in M365 UK, data had to be held in UK.
Plan - Move everybody remote to M365
Me - What about the latency? (Even with non-satellite comms the distance to the UK datacentres would give 600ms latency due to the laws of physics)
Them - Oh that'll be fine we are just throwing bandwidth at it, they only had a 2Mbit pipe before now it'll be 50 or 100 or similar and we can always add more
Me - What about the latency?
Them - We just told you how we're handling that
Me - You do realise that even in cache mode Microsoft recommend no more than 30mms latency and that's pushing it, Teams and SharePoint should be way, way less
Them - There will be plenty of bandwidth
Me - Yes I know, but latency is the killer issue here
Them - There will be plenty of bandwidth
I gave up after noting my thoughts in writing.
They are just about to do the migration now, will be interesting to here the response of actual users afterwards. :-)
Just as bad on phones.
iPhone. - Installed sizes not including data
McDonalds app - 348.5MB
Revolut - 401.5MB
Uber - 504.8MB
Outlook - 324MB
NatWest - 458.5MB
PayPal - 425.7MB
Why the devil do they need so much space.
Chase on the other hand is positively svelte at 225.3MB, other financial apps certainly aren't doing more than it.
I've seen the Revolut app up over 500MB sometimes then they seem to get their act together and it drops back to 350MB or so then starts creeping up again with every point release.
If they don't then no likely Private Eye will.
They certainly keep a close eye on defence procurement gamekeepers turned poachers.
e.g. General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay Melchett, former chief of defence procurement, is now working for defence contractor xyz after retiring 2 minutes ago and has pinky-promised not to be involved in any bid work on projects he knew about when at MOD for 18 months.
Yeah, had the switch port issue many times.
For instance user was reporting intermittent connectivity issues with Outlook in online mode which means it came through as a messaging ticket.
Obviously no fault found at our end and if she used colleague's PC all was fine.
Asked her to kindly try swapping the network port (not the cable) with her colleague who then started having the same issue.
Informed networks team in her building who of course denied anything could be up with their kit in any way shape or form. Must be the patch lead, nope tried that.
Eventually get them to repatch her at the switch end to a new switch and all is well.
Turns out that she'd been on 'one of those' switches which was slowly failing but they couldn't be bothered just getting the thing swapped out, hadn't flagged it up to anyone senior and were just moving people as they complained in the hope the thing would cure itself.
I'd be surprised if Corbyn could normally pass a Counter Terrorism Check or gain security clearance but since he was made a member of the Privy Council as leader of the opposition who knows.
Although the latter apparently doesn't need clearance unless being briefed on national security stuff.
Incorrect.
SE versions are their 'forever' solution for Exchange, Skype and SharePoint. Or at least as 'forever' as MS ever makes anything. Only problem of course is that it's subscription only now.
On-prem Exchange is a very niche product these days, really only sold to meet regulatory or security requirements, MS have made that clear since Ignite back in 2017 or something. They want you to be on M365 for sure, all that lovely monthly revenue to keep the markets happy.