Re: Am I missing something ?
Strange comment ... Google Authenicator and other 2FA apps provide TOTP and TOTP are exactly what the article explains would have allowed the attack to be pulled off. Downvoted.
214 posts • joined 19 Apr 2011
"At the end of the day, companies are responsible for ensuring the code they ship to production is safe, secure, and reliable,"
Open source maintainers dont ship to production. They ship to repository. The users of those repositories ship to production and are therefore responsible to ensure the code is safe and secure. Since open source has many advantages over closed source make this a value judgement. Is the poor chain of responsibility in open source worth it or not? There is no way to force the big open source users to connect with the open source producers but finding new ways to fund open source like patreon etc. could improve the situation.
Said object cant see at hypersonic speeds. That is the whole point. And a miss is as good as a mile unless nuclear which is a different game. Carriers will have moved many miles in unpredictable directions during even a hypersonic flight time. They are not at all fixed objects. If hypersonic was an advantage then existing rockets could easily achieve it. But they dont, presumably because of the final targeting requirement. Hypersonics advantage is arriving in the area quickly, and at relatively low altitude compared to ex atmosphere ballistics, so detection time is far later. Their weakness is in the targeting stage. Everybody is flapping around assuming that they are just faster versions of existing tech, which isnt true.
While hypersonic they are deaf, dumb and blind due to the speed induced plasma around them. Think space shuttle during re-entry. They can arrive in the area quickly which, for mobile targets like ships, considerably assists in targeting, but they would need to slow down before being able to find or receive the final targeting. Then they would be vulnerable to existing anti-missile technology. Not exactly the "carrier killer" bragged about or feared.
I think that Rust is just a very successful experiment but its lessons will be borged into the main stream languages eventually. It's main problem is the bolt on parallelism due to its initial establishment as a single threaded css processor within Mozilla. Go has the parallellism built in far better but will also be borged in the long run. The reason is that languages like C++'s problems are unavoidable if you want to deal with the breadth. The alternative is that we will no longer have main stream languages but separation into niches.
It looks more like a list of words that would not come up in school plus all anatomical words like penis and vagina. Banning the word "escort" and "undressing" seems a bit much. How are adults supposed to discuss all the banned items?
auto erotic, autoerotic, bastard, bdsm, beastiality, bimbos, bitch, bitches, bollocks, bondage, boob, boobs, busty, butt, buttcheeks, butthole, cialis, circlejerk, clitoris, clusterfuck, cock,cocks, darkie, date rape, daterape, dick, domination, ejaculation, erotic, escort, eunuch, fingering, gay sex, genitals, girl on, grope, hard core, hardcore, hooker, hot chick, huge fat, incest,intercourse, kinky, lovemaking, menage a trois, negro, neonazi, nipple, nipples, nsfw, nsfw images, nude, nudity, orgasm, orgy, panties, panty, pedophile, penis, playboy, porn, pussy, rape, raping, rapist, rectum, sadism, semen, sex, sexy, sexual, sexually, sexuality, slut, smut, snowballing, spastic, spread legs, strip club, suck, sucks, swastika, tit, tits,titties, titty, topless, undressing, vagina, viagra, vibrator, voyeur, vulva, xx, xxx
% share is more important than the absolute number. Of what importance is the absolute number to us in this news article?
Up from .1 to .5 would be explosive growth so I doubt that.
I donate monthly a small amount and am delighted to hear donations are doing so well.
Install. Uninstall. Reboot. Repeat. Is that a play on the rave mantra? Eat. Sleep. Rave. Repeat.. Eat. Sleep. Rave. Repeat.. Eat. Sleep. Rave. Repeat.. Eat. Sleep. Rave. Repeat.. Eat. Sleep. Rave. Repeat.. Eat. Sleep. Rave. Repeat.. Eat. Sleep. Rave. Repeat.. Eat. Sleep. Rave. Repeat.. Eat. Sleep. Rave. Repeat.. Eat. Sleep. Rave. Repeat.. well, you get the idea.
zfs isnt as flexible as btrfs IMO eg Cant remove physical extents and rebalance. btrfs is the default fs in suse. and apt-get automatically snapshots every upgrade and you can rollback or co-exist even version upgrades although it requires command line to do so. I doubt ZFS even comes close on that score. Pretty awesome.
I guess he is really trying to stiffen the moral of the more hard-line mandarins and provide some cover against their more moderate colleagues. The way he sees it, any reason, however implausible, for the mentality of mass spying is becoming a dire necessity, but I think they are trying to hide behind their fingers.
"Anyone know why Server 2003 is included, but not the more recent releases? Do they masquerade as a desktop OS, or is the data so limited, that one hobbyist has entered the stats on his own?"
because IE's "user agent" string identifies itself as running on 2003 but running on server 2008 and Vista cannot be distinguished ... so the Vista numbers will be including Server 2008.
I guess the vertical axis is labelled wrong. It should be market share FRACTION, not percentage
""You do not have to say anything, but it may harm your defence if you do not mention when questioned something which you later rely on in court. Anything you do say may be given in evidence.""
"BUT IT MAY HARM YOUR DEFENCE"
this was added about 10 years ago I believe
very slimey
Everybody is willingly carrying around a personalised bug now. Public sector type's wet dream. Now they want to use the bugs legally of course. It was courageous to demand free speech in the past since it could be used for evil purposes that we . Likewise I perhaps we have to be courageous enough to grant evil paedo-terrorists privacy although it seems nuts. I despite your ideas but will defend your right to speak them ... could become I despise your ideas and actions but I will defend your privacy to the death.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022