Re: Never should have been possible.
<pedant>Darik's Boot and Nuke</pedant>, actually...
And do check that you're attempting to wipe the correct drive!
845 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Apr 2011
> I'm pretty sure they could add a separate subscription level where you pay $x/mth not to bug you with adverts etc
What are these adverts of which you speak? Using a decent advert blocker restricts adverts to those deliberately inserted by the content-creator in a YouTube video, for example. (In fact the only example, since I can't think of anywhere else...)
I arrived at the start of a narrow one-way street in Beverley during what passes for its rush hour, looking for my B&B. [The one-way system in Beverley can easily mean a ten-minute drive back to where you began, should you make a mistake.]
Half-way down the street there were two signs proclaiming <Guest House>, but with no obvious entrance.
Having squeezed the car onto the pavement, I got out and phoned the owner of the B&B, only to find that it was located another 50 metres down the one-way street, and was identically labelled <Guest House>.
Clearly neither of the two house owners wished to give up the prestigious name, and presumably all the delivery-persons knew of this duplication.
And also those who had been once before...
> A company having two teams working on the same thing without being aware of each other's existence?
Indeed - this happened to me when I was part of the Network Team of $Fred'sLargeBankPLC, which team covered mainly the southern and middle part of England. Quite by chance, we suddenly became aware of a parallel team which covered the more northern part of the UK, and of whom we had never previously heard!
Perhaps we should have been more inquisitive, but we had a lot of work to do, and thinking outside the job was frowned upon...
> `But as Yogi Berra said: "In theory, there's no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is."
Neither Yogi Berra nor Albert Einstein.
Quote Investigator puts it down to Benjamin Brewster (1882).
Some very-many years ago, when IBM used to release the source code of their various operating systems on microfiche, a customer hailing from the mid-West of the US (yes, yee-haw...) had complained to "IBM Management" that one comment in a 360-Assembler comms code module read:
"Retry 10000 times, for the hell of it".
The hapless originating IBM programmer was required to change the comment, so that next time round the source code line bore the revised text:
"Retry 10000 times"...
> Probably one of the kinder descriptions of PL/I, a language "designed" by taking Fortran and COBOL, banging a six inch nail through them and spraying the result with Algol-ish syntax paint.
Rather harsh, if somewhat true. PL/I was notable for routines which handled the historic British currency of pounds, shillings and pence rather well. IBM must have put a lot of effort into the compiler for just this feature, and undoubtedly were mightily miffed when the British currency went decimal in Feb 1971...!
> I seem to recall a few years ago, that the French govt legalised the rounding up of pi to 3.2.
Maybe you are (also?) thinking of the so-called "Indiana Pi Bill" of 1897 (q.v.), which tried to legislate that the value of Pi was 3.2?
A rather more recent article in Forbes puts its foot in it in an alternative manner by stating:
Pi is a number that defines what a circle is. It's the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter, and it's the same for every circle: 3.141592 followed by a string of over 22 trillion other digits.
(My bolding)
> What more can you say about a scripting language that frequently requires a null operator and calls its null operator "IEFBR14"?
Years and years ago, in the days of OS/MVT 18.0 (or near offer), a new programmer was hired by IBM to work on MVT. This clever lad (for he was a non-female person) realised that IEFBR14 was a massive 4 bytes in size, and consisted of the two IBM Assembler instructions:
SR 15,15 ; clear register 15 to zero
BR 14 ; branch to the return address held in register 14
He thought that he would optimise the program by removing the first instruction, leaving only the two byte instruction:
BR 14
This he did, and put the 'optimised' version of IEFBR14 into the next MVT update. No testing or change-control was needed - "obviously" - since it was such a simple change.
However, he did not realise that register 15 was the return-code register, which would now contain an unspecified number, but not zero, and consequently all jobs which tested for a zero return code began to fail spectacularly.
I am not aware what happened to the hapless programmer.
> "Those CASIO wristwatches built in the 70's with permanent calendars are likely candidates, for example."
Permanent calendars are most likely to fail in 2120 when if they have a simple divisible by four rule for determining leap years. You should have kept your receipt.
Those of us who have had many instances of the standard model of Casio wristwatch since the 1970s already know that, in a Leap Year, 28th February is followed by 1st March on their watch. Having to reset the date every four years is hardly a good reason to return the watch!
> And solve the not-installed-here problem by distributing docs as PDF, not .doc!
That's not a solution, it's a restriction! What happens if the document needs to be further edited? Does the hapless recipient have to do a PDF-to-Word conversion, then sort out all the font and layout anomalies before editing?
Our mainframe user-name convention was to take the first three characters of the surname, the first character of the forename, and add a two-digit incrementing 'sequence number' to prevent clashes.
This usually worked fine; Fiona Smith became SMIF05; Ian Jameson became JAMI02.
However the convention had to be modified in certain edge(y!) cases, such as for Tracey Cunningham...
> Does the same bug/patch/KBxxxxx also cause a white band to be printed over bitmap prints from paint.net when using the "type 3" printer-drivers?
Ah, the "White Print of Death" (WPOD). Fortunately only a problem with the white-ink cartridge you put at the back of the computer desk drawer...
Sandals are simply shoes with a little extra ventilation.
Socks with shoes are entirely acceptable.
So should be socks with sandals.
Surely it's a bigger crime for Australians to call beach sandals "thongs".
And New Zealanders to call them "jandals" (supposedly short for Japanese sandals).
I'm sure I've told this one before, but in a previous century our company had a department which existed quite happily for a long time as "Organisation and Methods" (O&M).
A new and rather dubious Chief Exec then joined the company, and for no obvious or logical reason decided to change this department's name to "Systems and Methods".
After this rename, the members of the department delighted in answering the telephone with "S&M, how can I help you?"!
Couple of useful quotes from "Official Sources":
https://covid19.nhs.uk/pdf/how-to-guide.pdf
The app currently supports Apple iOS versions 11 and higher, and Android versions 8 and higher. If you have an older smartphone whose hardware is incompatible or uses an older version of the iOS or Android operating system, you may be asked to update your operating system.
Ho-ho - update my smartphone's Android v5.1 to v8? How?!
https://faq.covid19.nhs.uk/article/KA-01137/en-us?parentid=CAT-01035&rootid=
If I do not want to check in to a venue with the NHS COVID-19 app, am I still allowed to enter?
If you do not want to check in to a venue using the NHS COVID-19 app, you should be able to provide your contact details as an alternative. You have the right to choose to provide your contact details if you prefer this to using the NHS COVID-19 app.
Customers or visitors to hospitality venues must do at least one of the following:
* scan the official NHS QR code poster
* provide their name and contact details
* be in a group for which one other member has provided name and contact details
Hospitality venues must refuse entry to those who do none of the above. If you choose to check in with the NHS QR code you do not need to provide your contact details as well.
> one of those huge juggernauts that we all love to eviscerate with vitriol at every opportunity
I'm all for colourful phraseology, but in the interests of factual accuracy I would point out that evisceration = disembowelling cannot commonly be done with vitriol = sulphuric acid...
(I leave the matter of monkies in feisty knickers for the attention of another commentard.)