Re: Recycling
Work? After Brexit? That's a good one...
3895 publicly visible posts • joined 11 Jun 2007
Between June 2015 and March last year, the site is thought to have pocketed more than $370,000 in Bitcoin.
Am i the only one that looks at that and is a bit shocked about how LOW that figure is? In 3,5 years they only earned $370k. $100k a year? For running a site, that is heavily going to attract law enforcement scrutiny, and if you're caught, is going to see you locked up for the rest of your life (and have an extremely bad time of it in jail when the other prisoners find out what you were up to - no one likes a paedophile). For a $100k a year? There are soooooo many other criminal schemes you could run which would net you the same (and more) and run far less risk - scams, spam, malware, fake banking sites, etc.
Idiot must have been as into his product as his customers, in which case I hope they throw the book at him... (maybe not just the book. Throw the entire library at him as well...)
What I always find funny when some American official goes on an anti-TOR rant, is that the American government both created (through DARPA and the Navy intelligence branch), funded (and continue to do so), and encouraged the take up of TOR. The reason - it makes communication for undercover intelligence agents significantly easier. but only if lots of other people are using it to. they knew all along it would also be used by criminals, but decided that was unimportant.
So going after TOR is basically going after US Intelligence. That should end well...
And no I'm not talking about the Microsoft version.
They add significant weight, problems with sealing (doubly so in the space environment), significantly weaken your structure, and are an utter shite to install.
Stick a couple of cameras embedded in the structure on the outside and some monitors in place of the windows and let people look out the "windows" that way.
*grumble*grumble*old aerospace engineer*dang kids get off my lawn*grumble*grumble*
"Unlike 18th century France most of these companies are ultimately answerable to shareholders so there is a glimmer of hope that change can be effected without the help of Madame Guillotine."
Aww cant we please get out Madame Guillotine.... Please? I can think of a few very worthy recipients of her attention...
but I hate the terminology "gigabit-capable connections". It sounds far too much like advertising doublespeak. Your car is a 300km/h-capable Car. i.e it has 4 wheels and an engine and thats pretty much the same as a Bugatti Veyron. You might need a few tweaks to it before your specific car can do 300km/h, but as some cars can do 300km/h, and you've got all the basic ingredients that make up a car, then there's nothing wrong with saying your car is 300km/h capable, right?
Advertisers will be the first against the wall when the revolution comes... Ok maybe the politicians first... but advertisers definitely second...
AC, here's some info from a 2 min Wiki search
"After the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989, the Executive Councillors and the Legislative Councillors of Hong Kong unexpectedly held an urgent meeting, in which they agreed unanimously that the British Government should give the people of Hong Kong the right of abode in the United Kingdom.[33]
More than 10,000 Hong Kong residents rushed to Central in order to get an application form for residency in the United Kingdom. On the eve of the deadline, over 100,000 lined up overnight for a British National (Overseas) application form. While mass migration began well before 1989, the event led to the peak migration year in 1992 with 66,000 leaving.[34] "
So yes, right to relocate was allowed.
As for the executive law implemented, yes that was british but it hadnt been used for over 60 years. It should have been repealed definitely, but I guess it had been forgotten since it hadnt been used for so long.
The NBA has turned around and basically told China to p%ss off though.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-49979057
Their initial response might have been weak, but they have at least realised that there core market (the US) was about to turn on them massively.
Blizzard on the other hand will, based on past experiences, continue blythly on, lose massive amounts of support from the West, and then in a couple of years get kicked out of China when China shuts its markets to support local developers.
The problem here is that you need a prosecutor to bring a case against the people who lied to the court (i.e. the FBI). But the Prosecutors are on the side of the FBI. I mean the FBI brings criminal cases to the prosecutors to try in court. So there is zero chance of a Prosecutor bringing perjury charges against a member of the FBI (especially in a leadership position), because that will absolutely hurt them later when the FBI brings sub-standard evidence to them out of revenge. Failed/No convictions means Prosecutor out of a job.
The best we can hope for is that Congress are able to bring the axe down on the entire FBI leadership who lied before congress and to judges and cost them there jobs. The chances of anyone going to jail for lying to the courts or congress is about the same as a snowballs chance in hell...
Unfortunately, it's not quite that simple, the tether that connects the Mole to the lander comes out of the rear side of the Mole and is a thin flat cable made of Kapton (and wires). So you have to be very careful not to press down on that with the end of the arm. You're also doing this based on camera images taken from the Lander or high up on the arm. So you need to be very precise with what your doing.
In the end the team have decided to go with "pinning" the Mole to the side of the hole, so that at least part of the Mole has good solid contact with the hole wall (and the arm will provide some friction on the other side). If you want full details check out the HP³ Blog (https://www.dlr.de/blogs/en/all-blog-posts/The-InSight-mission-logbook.aspx). The Hammering will restart soon, so fingers crossed!
(from an ex HP³ Team member..)
Hey we tried putting a Mole into a space suit, but the bloody thing kept scratching up the suit, and putting holes in. It just couldnt seem to get the hang of using the claw holes provided. And boy let me tell you dont want to be cleaning out the space suit of a pissed off Mole. We had to shut the facility down just because of the smell!
It does very much sound like cartel behaviour doesnt it. A group of companies with voting control over the organisation that sets prices. Would someone like to be the one to report them to the Competition and Markets Authority? I cant unfortunately, as I dont live in the UK, and am not affected by the price rises. But a quick missive would go along way...
OK without knowing his actual sentence (maybe it was a life sentence, or maybe it was "only" 10 years), but he's effectively sentenced himself to 17 years of self imposed jail under far more stringent conditions than in the prison camp. 2m² cave, no electricity, no heating, no running water, cast off's for everything, and living in constant fear of being caught again. Prison will probably feel like a vactaion resort after that!
Now assuming, he didnt actually have a sentence that was life without parole, then he's basically added 17 years of jail to his previous sentence plus whatever they add on for escaping the first place. Probably would have been out by now already, but he wont be for along, long time now...
Yes it is possible, but long standing UN convention says you cant make people stateless by doing so. So if they're dual nationals then by all means you can strip them of their citzienship/nationailty to your nation. But if they hold only your nationality, then you're not supposed to be able to remove it and leave them stateless...
It's a nice idea, but that would simply mean you would get no FW/SW updates from the moment you purchased the device. No security updates, no fixes for problems that existed at release, nothing.
So whilst I really do like your idea, we all know what the practical response from firms would be. It's already a nightmare to get security updates for any piece of equipment thats more then 6 months old, add in your requirement and we wouldnt even get 1 months worth....
That's an interesting article is about all i can say.
Stallman makes some interesting points, and then he makes some other points which are off the bat shit crazy end of the paranoid spectrum.
It's maybe a shame for him that he's being effectively booted into retirement for his comments, but it also seems like thats probably not a bad thing for the health of the Free Software foundation. But more then anything, what I'm picking up is that Stallman seems like someone who thinks that his opinion is important, and obviously right, and anyone who doesnt "get it" is obviously just misunderstanding what he said. So in other words a bit of a self entitled prick. It seems like he's finally being called out on that and its costing him pretty big.
Whether he deserves it or not, depends I guess on where you stand on various issues...
"I'm wondering what in Enigma's design or operation would convince Malwarebytes to flag it as "Useless""
I'm guessing you missed this part in the article
"Enigma argued that its software isn’t "objectionable" and that Malwarebytes was just trying to get back at the company after it sued a tech support blog affiliated with Malwarebytes that published a bad review of Spyhunter’s program.
Which if true is pretty despicable behaviour from both sides (suing a blogger for a bad review in the case of Enigma and seeking revenge within your program by Malwarebytes). Both of them sound like they need a good kick up the a$$...
The people of Uxbridge and South Ruislip elected him to parliament, and the approximately 180,000 conservative party members elected him to lead the Conservatives after May resigned/was pushed out. The entire UK elected enough Conservatives MP's to give them the majority and hence make BoJo prime minister. So yes under the laws of the UK, you did elect BoJo. Even if you didnt vote for him directly...
It wasn't always like this....
Actually it was. It's never been any different. It's just rose tinted spectacles to say it was better in the past.
Every generation supports stupid, it's just gotten to such a level that people think the stupid is normal now and so are willing to elect the likes of BoJo and Trump and accept the bullshit they get fed. But thats not any different to the bullshit they used to get fed by the likes of Thatcher, Reagen or Nixon ("I am not a crook"), it's more that they now know they can get away with outright lying now and not have to worry about massaging a thing called truth.
To quote Sir Terry: "'The intelligence of that creature known as a crowd is the square root of the number of people in it." This also applies to populations...
"The moral of the story is, as always, keep track of your cloud database instances and always make sure public access is disabled. "
Unless of course your a criminal, in which case, by all means leave it open for the world to see. And dont follow any of the suggestions listed in this document. Just continue on as before. Thanks very much...
I'm actually curious - has anyone ever broken anything on their phone about from the screen and the case?
The comments about replacing a broken USB-C port or the like just got me wondering, as I cant say I've ever heard of people breaking such things. Displays cracking - check. Batteries dying - check. Case cracking - check. Individual components breaking or getting damaged - ????
I very much like the idea of the Fairphone, but I do struggle to see exactly how I would use the upgrade/change capabilities...
I agree with LDS. The firm I work for and all those for which friends and family work for (at least that I've spoken to on this topic) have gone out of their way to try and make sure they're complying with the law. Yes there are still some (the facebooks and googles) who are going out of there way to flout the laws, but the vast majority of firms in Europe or with major dealings with Europe are massively improving their data handling and privacy aspects.
It's already 1000 times better than it was before. Once the law starts really coming down on the obvious big boys, then you'll see the last outliers brought to heel..
Hello Silent_count,
Here let me explain that for you, it's really quite simple. There's this thing called Money, which we like. Facebook, Twitter and co. give us a tonne of it, which makes us very happy, and as such we make their apps "system" apps. If we didnt do that, they wouldnt give us all of the money and that would make us unhappy. So now you know the reason. I hope that helps...
Yours Sincerely
Samsung (and all the rest)
I'm not sure how he correlates his statement about having sex 6 times in 6 days, with one of his previous comment
"I personally think that being able to work 996 is a huge blessing" (https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/04/23/microsoft_github_china/)
I doubt I'd be able to get up the energy to have sex even once a week if I was working a 72 hour week...
<i<Of course, there is more to the story: Amazon UK noted the tax bill for 2018 was actually a hair under £14m, but was able to drop £13m of that into a bucket marked "deferred tax". It did the same trick last year, tossing £3m into the same bucket.
...Not that it seemingly matters, but Amazon also noted that the UK rate of corporation tax will be dropping from 19 per cent to 17 per cent for the year beginning 1 April 2020, and that "any deferred tax assets and liabilities existing at 31 December 2018 reflect this rate change".
</i>
I'm aware of Depreciation and the like, but being able to defer 13 out of 14 million tax, as well as 3 million last year seems excessive for a retailer.
The additional statement that they are taking into account a reduced tax rate as part of this is what inspired my comment.
Wait. What? You can choose to not pay taxes this year (or last year) so that you can pay them a couple of years later when the tax rate reduces???
"Right, Gov, I would like to defer my tax to the year 2100. I will pay all of the tax I incur between now and then in one lump sum at that point. Unless of course taxes are due to go down in 2101. Then I'll pay you in 2101. Unless of course..."
Please at least tell me that there are interest rates (at above inflation!) incurred on the unpaid taxes. Please?
What's that? One rule for us and one rule for them? Oh right, yes well carry on then i guess...
I'm interested to know Mr Summers if you would be happy with the police and government having the ability to read your every email, track your web browsing habits, track your phones location at all times, etc.? Even if the reading/tracking was being done by some "algorithm" that worked for the government?
I can only assume your answer is yes, because you seem to be very trusting of a firm that has no external checks and balances to make sure its not abusing that data. At least the police and the government would have the external check of the Courts of Law and the various Ombudsman's to try and make sure that the government is obeying the laws as they are written.
The few times that things have leaked out of google, it has almost always been found to be breaking and abusing laws in its quest to suck up more data. Which I would argue makes it a firm which has proven it is untrustworthy. And yet you seem happy to trust it... hmmm...
I guess you missed the point where it explains that they went from 219 training aircraft to 33!
(I'm not counting the Hawks because the article says that the MOD still provides them, but I somewhat doubt they provide all 100 of them, so the numbers are probably even worse!)
is it any wonder they cant get enough people trained...
Umm I wasnt arguing against Adblockers, I'm a big fan of them myself. i was merely pointing out unicornpiss's actions of boycotting a company who's ads he finds annoying wont have any effect.
And No, Advertisers WANT to show you Ads. They want their Product in front of your eyeballs. They may not like the Google/Facebook duopoly, but thats what they want, you seeing their Product, even for just 5 seconds. Why do you think companies pay a fortune for product placement in films? There's no specific ad in the film, but you see the Product, you become aware of it, and maybe then next time you think, oh I could use a new product, maybe i should get the Product that was in that film. Job done.
So No, its not just google/facebook who want to serve you ads, the advertisers do. Google and facebook probably are not that worried if you look at the ads or not. Just so long as they get paid, but these days they have to show that a person actually looked at the ad to get paid. Hence why they fight ad blockers so much...