The Point
When does Ringo's little allegory get the Blu-Ray treatment?
75 publicly visible posts • joined 30 Mar 2011
ASUS P8P67-M PRO
They need to be brought out from IDC headers, but they're there.
Good for CNC, at least (Gecko G540)
Personally, I'm looking forward to market bifurcation that sends the consumers out of the real computer market. The low prices on hardware have been nice, but not worth hassles like having hardware "standards" become non-standard after a couple rapid release cycles and hardware product lifetimes shorter than a mayfly's.
Bring on the fondleslabs for consumers, leave computers to those that compute.
Glad you're not my kid. Try one of these:
1.Macallan 18 yr.
http://www.themacallan.com/shop/detail.asp?pid=841614
2. Wireless TV headphones, so I can watch loud movies without bothering your mum. RF not IR so I can turn my head without losing the signal. Sony or Sennheiser, don't worry about the sound fidelity, worry about any delay to the sound. Music headphones I'll buy for myself, because you'll foolishly try to anticipate my tastes for "retro" for a time you never lived through.
3. Propellor Starter Kit
http://www.parallax.com/
4. Samsung Galaxy Tablet 10.1 preloaded with Jack Vance ebooks:
http://www.samsung.com/global/microsite/galaxytab/10.1/index.html
http://www.jackvance.com/
5. A pan of brownies, first one served up warm with ice cream.
Now that LinkedIn requires that I know a recipient's email address before I send an invite, it's become useless to me. If I already have their email, I have no use for LinkedIn. If LinkedIn won't let me contact them without it, it's just a source of unnecessary frustration.
I remember the stuff about the cosmetics industry creating demand for their own products that was around then, too. Theory was that the soaps sold would cut your natural skin oils and actually make you stink so that you needed to keep using deodorants and antiperspirants. Literally wash-rinse-repeat-profit. Plus the overall effect was supposed to be to cause skin problems that required powders, cover-ups, etc.
As cyberelic says, "recovery" from the use of soaps, antiperspirants, etc was supposed to take a week or two, after which your body's natural cleansing processes were supposed to take over. You'd have a body odor, but it was claimed that it wouldn't be unpleasant and would be even better than the artificial scents--making you a hit with those you wished to bed.
A lot of people found that an attractive idea, for lots of reasons (money, effort, emotion, etc.)
Never subscribed to it, personally, but heard plenty of it. I only went so far as to give up antiperspirants and shower twice or more each day.
I remember a woman at one workplace who couldn't even use the shower/bath at her home. She'd filled it with her plants. One day, she was given the key to the room at a local hotel room the company kept for visiting source inspectors and such and told to not come back till she'd washed and put on fresh clothes.
You nailed it.
You can't show off a rack of downloads or see someone else's to get an idea of their tastes and strike up a conversation.
An iTunes card is a cop-out gift, a specific CD or LP chosen with the recipient's tastes in mind is special.
Music is social, and that socializing happens at levels that an invisible file won't reach.
This is clearly all in support of laser-bearing sharks:
The ZPBC could also be used to provide in-water optical data to enhance models for underwater visibilities, [for sharks] laser penetration depths [and distances], diver and target vulnerability assessments [vulnerability too laser-wielding sharks], electro-optical system performance predictions [lasers], and refining numerical models [size/weight/number of sharks with lasers].
The subscript here is clear as can be.
A CD is a gift that shows some care for the recipient's taste in music.
An iTunes card or the like is just another gift certificate. Money thrown into a particular till that you'll have to throw more into to get the full value already spent. Even cash is a better gift.
A CD is a gift that I know I really appreciate getting. I've received several this last year, in fact many more than for several years--perhaps CD is making a comeback along with vinyl?
This 3 year old data wouldn't show it.
Once I wasn't sure which I'd want more--a Lens or the powers of the Mule/Second Foundation.
Things missing from the list:
Foundation shield belt.
Dune shield belt (are they compatible?)
Tantalus Field
Slidewalks.
And I'll second the Larry Niven teleportation pads and Krell mind device (suitably modified for humans.) Add to that the Krell power plant and my personal id monster.
I got one this last year that I'm using, along with an Ampro, Big Board, and Kaypro IV. The Ampro and Osborne are my favorites.
I mostly write code in assembly and Turbo Pascal.
I also use mine as a luggable. For a week I take it into the computer classes I teach to demonstrate some visible computer hardware for my students. It's not an Eee PC 900 by any means (my usual portable), but it does travel very well in spite of its weight. The students _love_ floppy drives (and Zork).
Good writeup!
Your mystery chips have the date code on top, designation on the bottom. You've got National Semi MM5290N-2 memory chips produced in the 29th week of 1982. Be sure to list them as *****RARE***** on ebay. ;)
It took two floppies to be useful, especially with single density drives. One had the program & its overlays, the other your data disk.
As it was there was software that wouldn't fit because it expected the greater capacity of the IBM-format 8" disks. When double-density became common, it helped, but it wasn't until quad density came along (not to be confused with high density 1.2MB diskettes) that mini-floppies had the same space available.
@Stuart: "app" has been in use since the late '70s at least. It got broadly popularized as part of the term "killer app" in the early 80's when 1-2-3 seemed to be driving sales of the original IBM PC (another trade name co-opted from common parlance. At about that time app came to refer more to application software than to a purpose to which the computer system was applied (e.g. a "control application" or "control app" involving both software & hardware.)
Apple didn't invent the "app" with OS X's .app files.