>The fact that Microsoft is reaping all the profit from Android – and Google none
Yeah, Google may as well be giving it away.
240 publicly visible posts • joined 29 Mar 2011
Yep, often using Flash Studio or Builder....
eg Machinarium - most expensive game in iTunes Top-10 and selling consistently well - but there are tens of thousands of others. Apple don't comment and developers largely keep mum for a quiet life.
[Also not sure about this HTML5+ vs AIR thing either - AIR includes WebKit and plays very nicely with HTML5]
>Do any of the so-called "patents" actually cover anything that wasn't industry standard practice before the company that initially applied for the patent was formed?
Quite a lot given before them there weren't any mobile phones and most handset manufacturers have agreements in place. Now that Google know the extent of Apple's licensing of Moto patents and IP agreements/exchanges, things must be interesting for the lawyers.
People have short memories when it comes to Apple damp squibs, but Apple's first mobile phone was a joint venture with Motorola not the iPhone.
>Try running a personal website with a .co.uk
Why? That's what org.uk is for......life would be simpler and neater, though granted less profitable for Nominet, if only a UK Ltd company could operate a co.uk.
As with all good ideas and Standards online, greed takes over and ruins it right at the fundamentals.....and don't even start me on the demise of hostnames in favour of w3 all the frigging time.
Lange/Masters outsourced most of the tech and instrumentation production to ensure realism - the list of aerospace & IT companies working on the film, along with NASA etc was more than impressive.
Pretty likely it was IBM or Honeywell that knocked up those tablets and definitely the case that a great deal thought went into their design.
> because it's was built as a copy of iOS
Android came into being a couple of years before iOS - though Google's aquisition of it coincided with the launch of the first Apple mobile phone - amusingly a joint effort with Motorola [the E790] the IP legacy of which must be keeping Apple lawyers up at night right now.
Its not unclear at all, parliament can issue a warrant and have the Police drag pretty much anyone currently in the UK before the committee regardless of nationality.
The Maxwells were thus threatened - pointless exercise though since there's no requirement to answer any questions, just turn up and say 'no comment'.
>Doing so will earn you a fail at the very next MOT when they check it lights up for a few seconds after turning the ignition on.
Usual method is to add a resistor in crappier cars or simply disable them via the ECU. 12 of the bloody things in my car, most of which have to be disabled as my usual rear passengers are still in child seats. [air bags + babies/toddlers = death/injury]
"Ventana is Nvidia's current Tegra 2 development platform. It's essentially a 10.1in tablet that's intended to smooth the way for Android developers looking to release software for the increasing number of Tegra 2 tablets."
Which still isn't actually out yet - but doesn't seemed to have stopped Advent, POV etc releasing 2.2 on Tegra 2 - or Modaco turning out rather good community firmware very promptly last year.
>Apple and its investors must be hoping it can be more "desperate" in the future.
You've both hit the nail on the head and entirely missed the point. It isn't just about turning a healthy profit and maintaing a degree of growth amidst the onslaught from much larger companies and consortia. Apple needs to justify its market cap and nothing short of spectacular growth will do that.
>NO DATA IS SHARED WITH ANYONE IT IS ONLY KEPT ON YOUR LOCAL DEVICES
Your location data is shared in realtime by many iOS Apps - and not just for ads and local service provision - any App which uses Flurry (20% of iOS Apps) or similar analytics packages reports your UUID against position every few minutes.
In October 2010 Flurry boasted that they already had 30TB of analytics data on iOS users.
The db in question is a sideshow really....
>No - that's precisely what Apple forbids in the rules quoted
There are get out clauses with respect to analytics/advertising and in any case Apple do not proactively enforce terms after initial approval - it would be rather difficult to do so and its easy to hide by encrypting data as many such services do.
I'm not picking on Angry Birds, I just think its a commonly installed App. By installing it you agree to the terms of the Privacy Policy I quoted above. You're also agreeing to a number of third party privacy policies as well, including services which aggregate your personal data across multiple Apps.
Most notable in Angry Birds, though it uses several 3rd party services actually, is Flurry:
http://www.flurry.com/about-us/legal/privacy.html
Which contains the classic line:
"This Privacy Policy in no way limits or restricts our collection, use or disclosure of aggregate information. "
I'm not making this up - read the privacy policies of the Apps you use and view the output yourself via a proxy if you don't believe me.
>[iOS Apps] cannot transmit data about a user without obtaining the user's prior permission
Indeed but this permission can be implicit and requires you to read the Privacy T&C.....pretty much all Apps using ads or 3rd party data mining deals report your position under iOS, its how they make money:
eg. Angry Birds: http://www.rovio.com/index.php?page=privacy-policy
.....even the above then requires you do a little more research into what the third parties are doing with your data - assuming you're able to work out who they are using Fiddler, your proxy logs or wireshark etc.
So it turns out "because of the closed nature of Apple's iOS" is rather more accurate than you suggest.
>Remember everyone that Linux = Lego. You don't have to use default Ubuntu and you can go for minimal with a basic desktop manager like dwm or ice or fluxbox or openbox
You could make the same argument with Windows, but the % of folk who replace the bundled Explorer shell with stuff like SharpEnviro is fractional - its worth the effort, but definitely a niche thing. Most people stick with minimal customisation of whatever ships.
>85% for the very similar Nexus S
No NFC, no SIP, lacks the gorgeous ergonomics of the curved screen.
>Yet a phone with seemingly more (rugged, fastest processor, better cameraS etc)
There's no difference on the CPU, GPU-wise the PowerVR SGX540 of Nexus S has twice the power (via 3D Mark Mobile) of the soon to be defunct Adreno 205 used in the Incredible S.
I'd give it 75% were I being generous - especially as the Nexus S has been floating about since last November.
>Shame the Skype Android App doesn't support video...
He's probably thinking of Fring which used to support Skype video calls on Android until Skype killed it off.
Android Fring still works fine with video chat on its own and most other networks though - AFAIK on Nokia, iOS handsets too. Its great if you're on the road a lot and have young kids, but I suspect most other applications tend more towards the sordid.