Oracle misleading by omission?
All the comments on the technical and economic implications of the benchmarks are interesting, but isn't the real issue that Oracle gets to pick and choose which reports are published? If Mr. Ellison gets to veto publication of any benchmark that shows Oracle hardware in an unfavorable light, what credibility do his claims of leadership have? Hardly "free and fair elections," so to speak.
And why is Violin Memory listed among the keywords for this article?