We already have them
> "build a set of tools designed to fix some of the most basic flaws and faults in IT security."
Cattleprod, shovel, roll of carpet, and a bag of quicklime is enough to deal with most of these.
2039 publicly visible posts • joined 25 Feb 2011
And if you follow the people who trade in the missing key BB's, you'll see them get into a car with dings on the bumpers and quarter panels, who then drive home where fence palings are falling off etc.
And you can bet within 3 months, their new iThing has a cracked screen.
Never had a BlackBerry keyboard fail on me. But then again, I treat an expensive electronic device with the respect it deserves.
Unfortunately, what he calls "slander", has ended up being his own words quoted back to him.
Or has been factual, evidence-based reports into the shady practices of Trump and businesses.
I look forward to seeing Trump try his luck, only for him to see his fortune dwindle down to something tinier than his hands.
> "This entire article is written on an unsupported premise instigated by Mrs. Clinton for the purpose of distracting attention from the ongoing exposure of her slimy past. If she can smear Trump as a Putin mole too, that's great."
Like how your entire comment is written on the unsupported premise that everyone in the world except Putin has it in for Trump for the purpose of distracting attention away from the fact that Trump doesn't have a clue about what it takes to be President, or what due process is, or legal ramifications of trying to break the constitution and various ammendments should he attempt to uphold his election promises.
That's the sound of the joke going over your head.
My whole post was a joke based on Mark85's line about "the dead coming in to vote", and that zombies would starve due to the lack of brains involved in the political spectrum at the moment.
Obviously my humour is far, far too subtle for people like you to be able to parse, so I promise to use the big "Joke Alert" icon next time I make a witticism, so your precious sensibilities are not offended.
> "Furthermore, Plaintiffs allege that the 'vast majority (over 80 per cent)' of the managers at the calibration meetings and people discussions were men, and Plaintiffs posit that 'female technical employees were systematically undervalued compared to their male peers because as a group they received, on average, lower rankings despite equal or better performance'," the court order continues"
Over 80% male. Say we round it down to be exactly 80% male. That means, given that it was based on peer reviews, that should they have done equal quality of work to their male counterparts, they had a 20% chance of getting the promotion. Not good odds to start with, as betting agencies make a fortune out of fools who think a 20% chance is a "sure thing".
So because this 20% chance doesnt come to fruition for 3 people (which doesnt even meet the minimum number required for a 20% chance to actually pay off once), it's automatically gender bias, rather than skills bias.
> "The engineers allege that the review system relies on manager and peer input from a group that is overwhelmingly male and, as a result, the female employees they evaluated may have missed out on raises and promotions."
Perhaps they should be suing their female ex-school peers, who decided against going into STEM jobs and thus perpetuating the very "gender bias" they are now claiming to be fighting.
> "Plaintiffs allege these performance evaluation methods are 'invalid' because they 'set arbitrary cutoffs among performers with similar performance' and are 'not based on valid and reliable performance measures'," the court's ruling, dated October 14, reads."
So it's gender bias because everyone who gave the same level of performance, were treated the same?
How about you start ringing up all of your mates, demanding that they demand their boss immediately changes every aspect of their business model they don't like, and wait to see how long it takes before one of the bosses tells your mate to pass on a "Fuck off" to you?
> "Shit battery"
As others have pointed out, it's happened even after they changed suppliers, so it's more design, than quality.
Either the too-thin case allows the phone to bend, thus damaging the battery, or the wireless charging coil is heating up and melting the plastic shell of the battery, or the lack of sufficient cooling on th cpu causes the same melting, or cheap dodgy USB3 charging cables, or the IMF got sick of having to modify standard hardware before sending Ethan off on a n mission, and just bollocksed the design of the Note 7 so it would self destruct after playing a certain message.
> "“Those who encourage others to commit a communications offence may be charged with encouraging an offence under the Serious Crime Act 2007,” warns the guidance."
So, by publishing this cunting, shitful, arsebrained, donkey-smegma guidance, you have actively encouraged me to commit a communications offence, as nobody with a sane, rational bone in their body could believe their tax dollars are going towards such fuckingly stupid bureautards making up muck-puckering bad "guidelines" to thoughtcrimes, without exploding in righteous, apoplectic rage.
As such, take yourselves directly to gaol, do not pass go, and do not fucking help your leperous, greedy self to $200.
Cunts.
Record the ones who slow down to take their eyes off the road and stare at a billboard. Doubly so if it's an "active" billboard that requires more than happy glance to parse the information advertised.
Then watch sue-happy America let loose against this tech as they claim the billboard "forced" them to stop watching what they were going. Records from the data slurping will be used against the advertisers in the courts.
End result: no more billboards (we can hope)
My mistake.
As an aussie, my first exposure to the Tucker brand, and story, was from that book. After that I did more research and was impressed with what he was trying to do. Some true parts stuck in memory, but also got mixed up with some of the fictional stuff.
> "Personally I'd rather pay the extra and have it for a year sooner, but then I'm not a total tightwad."
Some people are happy to pay a premium to be beta testers.
Sensible people wait until people like you have spent your wad, and worked out the kinks, before they pay less than you for something that works better than what you got.
If you're happy with being a beta tester, all well and good, enjoy your toy. But just because most of us are jaded and cynical after being treated as beta testers for allegedly "stable" hardware and software, and thus prepared to wait a bit longer for a proper working version to come out, does not make us tighwads.
> "The problems with renewable energy generation need to be acknowledged so that engineering solutions can be developed."
You mean like how the problems with fossil fuel energy generation (environmental damage, pollution and the subsequent knock on effects) have been acknowledged, solutions engineered, but conservative governments, bibles bashers, and shills are doing their damndest to prevent any of these solutions becoming viable?
A mishap is less than an "accident", but more than an "oops".
Sort of like bumping into someone drinking a pint.
Oops: just a bump, no beer lost.
Mishap: slight spillage, half a mouthful gone.
Accident: Most of the beer is spilt, and you best fetch the lad a refill
Catastrophe: Pint fully spilled, and you get a punch in the face even after you bought the lad a replacement
> "Android is just as much of a lock-in as Apple."
Not really.
Think of Apple's walled garden being exactly that. A great, big, fuckoff wall. Some things (movies, music) you can take outside the wall with some fucking around, but your apps you can move to another manufacturers device.
Android is more like the standard wire fence topped with barbed wire. You can easily move between paddocks (manufacturers) with minimal of fuss. Music and movies tend not to be DRM'd either, and can be moved about without proprietary software.