Re: MS Borks an update?
I can hear from the whine of laptop fans in our office when it's patch Tuesday.
I wonder how many gigawatts of power this inefficient update engine consumes every month?
393 publicly visible posts • joined 25 Feb 2011
There's lots of other Windows stuff that doesn't work well on Arm.
Many devices don't have Arm drivers, and the chances of getting a driver for any non-new hardware are tiny.
Similarly many anti-virus and Virtual machine hosts don't work.
I'd give it at least 2 years before switching to Windows on Arm.
I'm of the same opinion as you.
I've been primarily a Microsoft person since DOS 3.3. I've used most versions of Windows, been on NT since 3.51, I've played with Linux since the very very early days, but Windows has been my daily driver, as it had more apps I need. However, after 35 years, I will switch to Linux as my main OS soon and run any Windows stuff I need in a firewalled VM.
Microsoft has just got to hostile to its users. Most have little choice to stay in the abusive relationship now.
Most likely most Crowdstrike customers are locked into a subscription model. Those CIO's who recommended Crowdstrike are probably gonna lose face if they go with another product, too.
Crowdstrike's labour costs are also down since they offshored most of their technical work in February 2024.
> "What made Microsoft, love it or hate it"
So true. Unfortunately Microsoft seems to have forgotten that what most users want from an OS is to run programs and get out of the way.
Many of the "upgrades" to Windows in the last 20 years have resulted in regressions, things look and work differently but in many ways they don't work better.
Even if it does have many weird hardware configurations, there are solutions to fix this up. BSP = board support packages abstract things away, allowing standard operating systems to run on a variety of packages.
Hell, even Windows has a HAL = hardware abstraction layer. This allowed the original design to run on Intel x86, DEC Alpha, RISC and MIPS CPU's.
Android is just a steaming mess to get built. Plus big companies like Samsung bypass the open source Android API to implement their own steaming blob of mess, like VoLTE drivers.
> "How does Microsoft get to apply patches to someone else's boot loader"
It's worse than that - Microsoft patches often include BIOS and even CPU microcode updates.
The most infamous was the microcode update to Spectre which slowed machines down around 15%.
So your machine is not the same after a patch Tuesday.
Don't forget taking away features, too.
Even small things like Windows 10 makes it very hard to set up arbitrary UI colors.
The amount of PR spin involved in MS allowing Notepad to have a dark mode is incredible. Next year it will even support tabbed Windows.
I get the feeling software is now designed by multiple layers of committees.
These fancy trajectories are interesting, but I can't help thinking that launching on a bigger rocket with a decent booster stage would allow a direct to Jupiter trajectory like Pioneer and Voyager used.
Still, I guess it's a trade off and allows more mass for payload. Pity rocket power hasn't improved much since the 1960's.
Crowdstrike's response sounds like they paid the third party consultants to make them look good.
The facts are clear: They did not test this particular release before releasing it to the world.
Sure, they may have tested the sub-components separately, but anyone who's been in IT or engineering knows that one must test the whole friggin' system.
One wonders if Intel shut down their QA department to save unnecessary costs?
Perhaps some bright spark MBA saw how well that worked for Microsoft in the last few years, users can do the QA. If there's a problem, just release a patch. Problem is it's a bit harder to patch hardware.
Boeing and Crowdstrike have recently learned similar lessons.
We got out of it for similar reasons. Plus it was always slower than VMWare player.
Anyone still using VirtualBox for free in a corporate environment should be very very careful not to install any of Oracle's recommended plugins, unless they want a visit from Oracle's licencing dept.
True there's no longer an engineering culture, it's all short-term cost saving by people who don't understand the technology.
Engineers are now a costly "resource" like paperclips. MBA's regard them as fungible. Why pay for expensive engineering resources when someone with the same title can be sourced in India for $9 an hour? Boeing did with the 737 MAX ACAS software, Crowdstrike did it in February.
All this ignores that engineering skills do matter, testing is crucial in a complex environment. The MBA needs to learn that even if they choose to ignore reality, reality will not ignore them.
In February 2024 Crowdstrike had layoffs in the USA and moved most tech jobs to India. They proudly announced this via a press release.
It's the same as Boeing's 737 MAX ACAS software being outsourced to $9 an hour jobs in India.
Unless very carefully managed, the savings are an illusion.
Who knows? There is a possibility Kaspersky was refusing to whitelist malware written by certain US three letter agencies. EternalBlue being a case in point.
An example may be being made of them to other AV vendors who are thinking of detecting things they shouldn't.
So you can choose who spies on your PC, Russian FSB or some US TLA.