Posts by ricegf 142 publicly visible posts • joined 11 Feb 2011
Exactly my first thought!
When I worked at NASA, we had no vending machines. So a cabinet was kept stocked with treats, with a tin can for cash payment and a clipboard and pen on the inside of the door if you didn't have the cash with you.
The stocker would occasionally announce a "free treat per customer" day because we'd sometimes round up payments and the can would get too full of excess cash.
I really missed that when I left.
Virginia didn't just take back it's DC contribution in 1847, it took the rest of its land out of the US entirely in 1861. Or tried to, depending on your view of history.
Oddly, once the US forced Virginia to either rejoin or admit it never left the US, the land that was originally ceded to DC and then rescinded wasn't forcibly re-ceded.
We talk about doing that periodically,or returning most of Maryland's land on which people actually live as well, or making DC into the one state to rule them all. We excel at talk.
New EV prices are competitive with gas vehicles now, as are 3-5 year old used vehicles.
12 year old EV beaters don't exist yet because they haven't been in mass production for 12 years. Patience.
And the batteries will handily outlast the vehicles based on extensive field data. You can find the degradation curves online with a simple search. Are we still having to explain that one?
The only issue for hydrogen vehicles is storage?
Where to begin.
Over 90% of hydrogen is grey, manufactured from natural gas, producing just as much GHGs as burning the stuff. You can make it blue from water IF you have money to burn, because...
While grey hydrogen costs "only" 3x the price of gasoline per mile, green is at least 9x using renewable electricity. And grey itself is at least 10x more expensive than grid electricity in an EV. (Electricity, gas, and especially hydrogen prices vary a lot, but I've yet to see hydrogen prices anywhere near competitive with its successful competition unless extremely subsidized. The first hit is always free, right?)
The nozzle freezes to the car when refueling on humid weather.
But that's rarely a problem, since you can count the number of refueling stations on one hand and still give Exxon the finger. Road trip? Only if you orbit a hydrogen station.
And don't expect a hydrogen refueling station building boom anytime soon. New stations cost more than gas stations, far more than fast chargers, and my calculator lacks the zeros for how much more than Level 2 chargers. And the few existing stations are shutting down, at least in California.
You can't refuel at home overnight. Gas vehicles can't, either, of course. But EVs...
Carrying around a pair of 700 bar tanks filled with hydrogen can only end well. At least a hydrogen leak in your enclosed garage is unlikel - oh, wait.
Speaking of which, the tanks occupy the space I need for the frunk. Not to mention the legroom.
Acceleration is leisurely, even given the battery you still need to keep it acceptable and to store regenerated electricity.
And the price? The cars are barely affordable as long as they include hefty subsidies.
And then there's... my tired fingers.
Just the storage? Oh, my sweet Nelly Rose.
"NASA would have to choose between payload capacity, hitch-hikers risking injury during splash down and testing out Dragon's original propulsive landing plans."
I could be wrong, but I believe the original propulsive landing relied on the hydrozene check valves that were replaced with burst disks after a crew dragon exploded during tests due to a valve leak. I'm not certain propulsive landing remains even theoretically possible in a production crew dragon now.
Starlink is expected to generate $3.1 billion in profit in 2024, actually, but as a private company you won't see an audited statement that proves it.
But the same argument that applies to the Ariane 6 applies to Starlink: The ability to download massive amounts of data ("the payload") including live video streams during reentry of Starship is simply priceless and in itself another very marketable product. We had fast, reliable Internet in our last Caribbean cruise because... You know.
Nor is Starship primarily intended to launch Starlink satellites, although larger and more capable satellites with lower launch costs will expand profit margins. Falcon 9 is the Family Truckster of launch vehicles - cheap, reliable, reusable, unique. But Starship is a container ship. It doesn't deliver 2 astronauts and 3 days of supplies to the moon - it delivers a 16-story warehouse. It doesn't deliver a Mini-size rover to Mars - it delivers 100 colonists and 2 years' supplies.
SpaceX is everything laughable and magnificent and stereotypical and absurd and wonderful about America. And I love it.
Not sure about the definition of "tiny", but certainly not enough. For the desktop market in 2023, Windows had about 70%, OS X about 20%, and Linux much of the the rest with roughly 1/3 Chrome OS and 2/3 Gnu. Perhaps a significant portion of Gnu is in a Windows Subsystem for Linux container, though.
Android works fine as a Linux that is the biggest seller of all in personal devices, but I truly miss and would love to see a revival of Nokia's Gnu Linux phones, the spiritual descendent of my late beloved N900 and the briefly sold but well-received N9 successor that Microsoft killed with a $1 billion check. But I'm probably just weird. *sigh*
And it can't even run Linux programs natively because it only uses the Linux kernel
I take it you don't use a Chromebook? Despite all of your screaming that it's something else, running Linux apps is still as simple as Settings > Advanced > Developers > Linux Development Environment > On.
I taught an entire Linux programming course at a major university on my Chromebook. Because... It's Linux. Same commands, same package system, same apps.
I taught a Linux-based university course on an Acer Chromebook with no issues when my 7 year old Dell laptop went nuts (during lecture!) early in the semester. It ran the same tools (slightly different versions) with the same presentation and results.
It is indeed just Linux with a default web-based desktop.
Oh? I started my new Dell PC a couple of years ago. It set up encryption for the drive, upgraded from Windows 10 to Windows 11, rebooted - and asked me for the encryption key.
What encryption key?
To their credit, Dell people spent two hours on the phone with me trying to break into my new computer. We went to the Microsoft website to recover the key, for example: It literally said "There's nothing for you here". (Who writes Microsoft's error messages?)
Finally they gave up and provided a phone number at Microsoft, but that person just wanted my credit card number before they could help me. I think not.
Just me? Nope. One of my students at university asked for my help. He had bought a Dell computer and it had encrypted the drive and upgraded to Windows 11, too, locking him out. I told him to return it to the local store as defective.
Just Dell? Nope. The university computer I was given came with a one-time login to allow me to set up a local boot password. However, Windows grabbed control as soon as I entered my credentials to install mandatory patches and then rebooted, giving me no opportunity to set a boot password!
Am I just unlucky? Perhaps. But I believe the real culprit is that people tolerate Windows because it's all they have used. They assume all desktops are like that, and since it runs the applications they learned early on, they stick with it. Or as many people I know like my brother who can get away with it, just switch to iPhone only.
Their choice, of course. But from an objective perspective of someone who has used all 3 major desktop OSes extensively starting with Windows 1.0 (it ran PageMaker!), Mac OS 1.0 (bitmaps and an Imagewriter? Priceless!), and Mandrake Linux 7.0 (before they were sued by King Feature Syndicate and became Mandriva and I like so many others switched to the Warty Warthog), in terms of user friendliness, Windows is in a rather distant third place.
Just my $0.02 - but I've paid far more than that in my dues! :/
I remember it well, being of a certain age. Lindows' argument was that "windows" was the generic description of a computer desktop by the time Microsoft got around to writing theirs. Just as you can't trademark Hotdog™ as the brand of your hot dogs, they argued the word windows was an invalid trademark on a windowed operating system.
Their argument was getting great traction, too, so Microsoft wrote them a $20,000,000 check to settle the lawsuit in full. All Lindows agreed in response was to change their name.
Sounds like a win to me.
Sure, I'll bite. What printer do you have that won't work with which distro? What filesystem are you unable to mount?
We used to laugh (good-naturedly) at Windows, because every time we bought a new printer it just worked with Linux whereas we had to manually install drivers for Windows. Windows is closer to Linux now in that respect, at least. They're learning.
I've always had great difficulty mounting any non-Windows filesystem on a Windows machine, but have rarely found ANY filesystem that Linux can't mount.
Of course, WSL 2 is getting much better at providing a reasonably good desktop Linux experience on Windows with minimal effort. My Chromebook's Linux support is also quite good. Perhaps you'd be happier taking that route instead of a native install?
Why do you assume new distro developers must aspire to mass adoption?
Are you not aware that the huge base of fanfic authors don't expect to write a best seller? They write for the love of writing and exploring their corner of fandom.
Similarly, distro (and free software) developers often develop simply for the love of development and better understanding their chosen technologies.
Your "waste of time" is a normal person's "fascinating hobby"!
No. If the Linux desktop grows too much, it will attract rent-seeking corporations who will lock down choice in favor of profits.
The Internet was the great democracy experience. Now we have Facebook and Google.
DOS and Windows brought computing power from mainframes to individual control. Now you pay subscription fees for your web-based apps and cloud storage.
Streaming let you cut the cable. Now you pay the same fees to Netflix, Hulu, and Sling.
Can we please just keep Linux to ourselves?
Rockets launch capsules or shuttles and then land on their tails (or in the case of Rocket Lab, parachute and get captured mid-air by a helicopter).
DreamChaser is equivalent to a capsule, not a rocket. Capsules either splash down in the ocean (all US capsules prior to Starliner) or touchdown on land with retros and / or airbags (Russian and Chinese capsules and Starliner).
Shuttles perform runway landings. This is much gentler for sensitive cargo, likely a major factor in DreamChaser selection as a cargo ship, and simplifies reuse. But they also have more interior space and greater flexibility for crew missions.
And they just look cool. Hard to put a price on that.
Given Boeing's ongoing litany of engineering, uh, challenges across do many of its programs, I'd be delighted if Congress added funding for the crew version of the DreamChaser shuttle to the upcoming budget.
DreamChaser will begin cargo operations next year, and was designed for human transport as well but want funded in the final round of that program's funding. Given the upcoming breadth of human stations, a third option would be most prudent.
Classic MacOS was on v6 and didn't have that many standard keystrokes and things yet.
What? MacOS 1.0 specified how menus should be laid out and which keyboard shortcuts went with the common menu items. That was the point of MacOS from the start - learn one application, know how to use the rest for free.
In the USA, critical analysis is an affirmative defense against copyright infringement claims. The OP is permitted to show a reasonable number of website screenshots for the purpose of demonstrating the validity of his assertions. Not that YouTube would care about the law or justice, of course.
S/he did what I did - I followed the product's website instructions, which led to a dead end.
I seriously doubt any project will "thrive" if their installation instructions are stillborn, and you have to add repositories provided by a random commenter on an El Reg article to actually install it (which is better than installing executables downloaded from the official project page how?).
The actual claim was that the project is thriving, not that Waterfox has more users than Firefox.
The Waterfox repository is gratifyingly active based on commit frequency, though not as active as Firefox. But I suppose "thrive" implies long-term trends, which I too would like to see
Back when I worked a corporate job, we had to switch one large team away from Word because its conditional text feature regularly corrupted documents. Fixing corrupted Word documents was actually a line item in their budget, as I recall. (We moved to FrameMaker, I believe, because the team had used it earlier and thus needed little training to implement the switch.)
In general, back when I used Office, I found less popular features to be bug-ridden and unreliable, but perhaps we were just above the safe power user level. I've personally had fewer problems with LO. *shrug*
This is a feature, not a bug. But LO has several alternate UI configurations, even the abominable ribbon one.
I actually had to switch my last book from Word to Writer because Word kept moving images outside the margins. The bug report on it was rather old - no idea if it has been fixed since, because I don't see a reason to switch back, being happily non-corporate now.
WordPerfect's Reveal Codes (which were an unrelated precursor to the web's HTML) was the last time I felt truly in control of a document's content and layout. That Microsoft used their Windows monopoly to cram Word down corporate throats will forever be to their shame - not that Gates' or Ballmer's Microsoft had any. At least Sayella has given up his predecessors' irrational jihad against free and open source software.
It's actually a strength of battery operated vehicles: They are fully refueled at start of shift, so officers never needed to visit a petrol pump - IF the vehicle is connected to the mains while at the station house. But as the article briefly notes, ignoring fuel levels never ends well regardless of whether you store the energy as petrol, diesel, electrons, hydrogen, or a wound-up rubber band.
"I think the point is that Democrats aren't actually in government right now. So they can't do anything but try pointless things."
If that's their point, it's badly damaged by their claim that the LAST time they held the presidency and both houses of Congress (by overwhelming majorities) that the Republicans blocked them at every turn but one.
Why are the Democrats so dang impotent now when they are only *one vote* short in the Senate and reasonably close in the House? You frustrate me, Ds!
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2025
