@flearider (was: Re: One point that is often conveniently forgotten ...)
Uh ... no.
Solanine is not nicotine.
26667 publicly visible posts • joined 7 Jun 2007
... but after reading the article, I typ(o)ed a dead-tree letter to my Great Uncle Lincoln (who is computer illiterate) in EMACS, and printed it out on a Daisy Wheel. It'll be stuffed into an envelope and sent via USPS tomorrow, he'll get it Monday or Tuesday. It pretty much looks WYSIWYG from here.
Horses for courses & all that.
As I posted elsewhere:
"Whatever. Oxford is wrong. We were using the word "selfie" for self portraits taken with Polaroid's "Land" cameras, especially the SX-70, in the early 1970s. (San Francisco Bay Area.) I suspect searching the Usenet archives could turn up many cites for this term being in use on TehIntraWebTubes in the very early 1980s, but I can't be arsed to look. A late 1970s or earl 1980s CompuServe or TheSource photography forum archive would probably also turn up cites, if such an archive exists.
"Kids these days think they invented everything ..."
Whatever. Oxford is wrong. We were using the word "selfie" for self portraits taken with Polaroid's "Land" cameras, especially the SX-70, in the early 1970s. (San Francisco Bay Area.) I suspect searching the Usenet archives could turn up many cites for this term being in use on TehIntraWebTubes in the very early 1980s, but I can't be arsed to look. A late 1970s CompuServe or TheSource photography forum archive would probably also turn up cites, if such an archive exists.
Kids these days think they invented everything ...
I have no grudge against thumbs. It's a logical thing, when you think about it. Consider that I can easily write a script to either "thumbs up" myself for all the posts in my posting history, using any number of open proxies ... or likewise, "thumbs down" all of the posts in your posting history.
In the case of me personally clicking (running a script to) "thumbs up" my own posts, only I would know that it happened. I'm not narcissistic. So that will never happen.
In the case of me down voting all your posts, I see no real reason for that ... I did do that as an example a while back. I down voted all of a user's posts on the current first page of their posting history. Manually. I regret it.
My point stands. Thumbs are pointless as currently implemented.
As for "badges" ... surely we're long past serf to crown?
No badge = the rabble.
Bronze = valued foot soldiers.
Silver = Been here long enough to make the kingdom money.
Gold = Self-appointed Nobility (or by the Nobility).
Seriously, grow up ElReg. Allow humans to interact without artificial, meaningless pigeonholes.
My opinion?
Stick with your handle. The idiots following you around after some perceived sleight don't deserve the "victory" of your name going away.
Badges? We don't need no stinking badges. They are an ugly artifact of marketing.
So-called "thumbs" are worse ... random, faceless idiots trying to do a binary "I approve" vs. "I disagree", without actual explanation, is pretty much next to useless.
ElReg really needs to reconsider the entire "badge" and "thumbs" concept. It scares people, and keeps them from posting. It's not censorship, but it is stifling over the long-haul.
Morons clueless about technology are clueless morons.
Earth to AFP: Eyeball "United Kingdom – United States of America Agreement". It already exists, if you have the clearance. If you don't have the clearance ... well, you probably shouldn't go there.
No, geeks are NOT hard to work with.
Management IS hard to work with when it comes to technical stuff, because they have absolutely zero clue how the system works, and refuse to even try to understand reality.
Define "cloud". Then define "cloud computing". Face it, folks, in the bottom-line "the cloud" is simply a marketing gimmick that computer illiterate MBAs have bought into.
Typing as a geek who is called in to fix management disasters on a regular basis ...
Try to educate yourself, Vic. Here's a starting point:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_maria
Yeah, yeah, yeah, I know, Wiki sucks. But it's got some good links.
Again, see my reply to Chris Miller, above.
Not a professional, just an amateur. See these two posts:
http://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/containing/1432149
http://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/containing/1433296
The 20 inch is a work in progress ... and again, the Wife is fascinated :-)
There is only one problem with your argument. Your "impact craters" on the nearside aren't a result of impact. Rather, they are a result of the moon's internal vulcanism.
I rather suspect the farside had similar features soon after tidal-lock set in.
The phrase "are said to be" doth not scientific proof make.
Spin a bucket around at the end of a rope.
Allow several hundred people to randomly throw dyed water balloons at said bucket from any and all angles. Observe how much dye actually lands in said bucket, compared to what splatters onto the outside of the bucket and yourself, in the center of the system.
For fun, and charity purposes, fill the balloons with ketchup instead of water+dye.
My early 1980s Bridgeport can be either manually operated, or can take computer instructions. The computer involved started as an MS-DOS machine (ver. 2.1? 2.11?), the programming language was a bad port of K&R C (possibly via XENIX) and/or a nice variation of x86 assembler (the Intel/IBM fingerprints were all over it). Today, the computer is Slackware-current. The programming languages? Guess ;-)
I have a 7'2" by 1.85" white oak staff that I occasionally use as a walking stick. I forged iron caps for each end of it, mainly because I don't want it to wear out before I'm done with it. It's a comfy piece of wood ... When I ran across it, I knew exactly what it was meant to be.
Minimizing your list of ingredients is contra-indicated if you want good results. The original AC suggested gun cotton was the only ingredient in modern small arms propellant.
The primary ingredient in bread is flour. The devil is in the details. Think about it.