The sad thing is ...
... those of us who have been using Slack for about 23 years are just shaking our heads at the the silliness of this fly-by-night product.
Kids these days.
26716 publicly visible posts • joined 7 Jun 2007
"If you took that bet, you'd probably lose as all he says is the "chances are" - not that you "are." This means your experience of a different environment isnt enough to falsify his statement."
I took the bet. He was wrong. Ergo ...
::fades to black::
"When you run a corporate IT infrastructure, the chances are you run Active Directory underpinning a predominantly Windows-based array of servers, desktops and laptops."
I'll fade that bet ... Not a snowball's chance in hell, in fact.
"And that's fine: it probably serves 90 per cent of the kit you have"
Nope.
"and is a secure"
Post proof, or retract.
"easy-to-use way of authenticating user logins."
Easy is secure? Since when?
systemd
-free Debian fork
Nice AdHom.
Sad that you don't know the difference between code & software.
BSD code runs on all kinds of hardware without further editing.
When it is running, it's software.
It's not pedantry, it's reality. Learn it. Live it. Love it. Or leave it.
"There are countless problems with making the so-called "internet of things" (IoT) a pragmatic reality: hardware, software and standards to name the big three."
You can't count to three? Allow me to help:
[0] Security
[1] Hardware
[2] Code (Software is merely the current state of the hardware).
[3] Standards
"You would never torture a critter but will happily let whippets tear a rabbit to pieces??"
No. The dawgs snap their furry little necks, and that's it. No muss, no fuss.
"What sort of fucked up rationalisation is that???"
It's called "The Law Of The Wild". Food doesn't originate in the back rooms at Safeway/Tesco.
"Cybercriminals are way ahead of the game against defenders"
Part of the problem is manglement thinking "cyber" means "something terrifying".
"without having to try anything new"
Part of the problem is manglement refusing to pay for anything newer than 1980.
"according to the latest edition of Verizon's benchmark survey of security breaches."
Ah, yes. Verizon. That benchmark of secure providers.
I already own jake.TLD[0] ... As a direct result, I own buy.jake.TLD, joy.jake.TLD, coupon.jake.TLD, got.jake.TLD, room.jake.TLD, talk.jake.TLD, pin.jake.TLD, smile.jake.TLD, read.jake.TLD, like.jake.TLD, call.jake.TLD, book.jake.TLD, author.jake.TLD, and others.jake.TLD ... I don't actually have any of those setup at the moment, but I might do "others" just for my own amusement.
One wonders if the children running Amazon (etc., insert multi-billion dollar internet advertising organization of your choice in place of Amazon here) don't actually understand how TehIntraWebTubes work, and ICANN are suckering them out of their money.
[0] Several.TLDs, in fact ... In the old days, the only one I didn't have was .mil ;-)
Simple. All you have to do is realize that security is a meatware issue. Stop spending money on hardware & code, and start spending your money on cognizant humans. One good coder at ~USD200,000/year beats a ~USD15,000,000 room full of servers every day of the week.
"Matthews is a former Director of Cyberspace Operations for the US Air Force"
When interviewing for said "one good coder", if the candidate mentions the word "cyber", stand up,shake their hand & tell them you will get back to them. Then send their c.v/resume to the bit-bucket shredder.
"and says organisations currently spend about 70 per cent of their security cash on blocking threats. He'd rather you spend money on figuring out how to handle breaches."
I'd rather spend money on hiring coders to run secure systems, instead of fixing 'em after they break. It's worked quite nicely for me for well over a third of a century ...
But what do I know? I'm not a .gov bureaucracy.
... when articles like this bring out the vitriol spewing idiots. Hint, kiddies, if your drool is dribbling down your chin, you probably shouldn't post. Just saying.
THAT said, "A new task force called Barrier Breakers claims it will "help Clinton supporters push back on online harassment and thank super delegates."
It's just online text. It doesn't matter. It's not important. It never has been, it never will be. Anybody who thinks otherwise is either a fucking idiot, or a marketard targeting fucking idiots.
... my small cluster of vaxen (late 1970s to early 1980s vintage) contain MMUs that already perform this in hardware ... as do my small collection of early Sun kit. And it's a hell of a lot faster than any software variation.
Kids these days brought up on "personal computers" have no actual clue about computing.
Seriously. I learned to pick physical locks in the mid 1960s.
Nothing has changed.
So-called "restricted locks" are just as vulnerable as your bicycle lock.
A bit of street sweeper bristle, a couple of files, and a bit of know-how ,and you are in. I won't even get into the concept of "bump keys".
See the MIT Locksmithing Guide.
Remember, most locks are only there to stop crimes of opportunity ... If a criminal chooses to bust into your home, a brick through the window next to your front door will work quite nicely, the lock isn't going to help any.
Anybody working with .NET, ASP.NET, JavaScript, VBScript already does that. It's part of the job-description, and "designed" in, near as I can tell.
COBOL, on the other hand, is dead ... Long Live COBOL!
Seriously, there are more functional lines of COBOL and Fortran working in big business today than the average kid who never used a dial telephone could possibly imagine. I do not know of a single COBOL or Fortran programmer who is currently out of work. I can't say the same for Java(script), VisBas, C++, C#, and what-have-you. Not a month goes by when I don't get email from a former student, thanking me for suggesting COBOL or Fortran as another programming language to learn ... The two are pretty much ubiquitous in big business.
"The real reason is supply and demand"
Absolutely! There is zero supply chain (no room to make more space in SF's 49sq miles), thus allowing the owners and TheCity&County to demand as much as they can get away with from idiots who can't do math(s). Sales tax has absolutely zero to do with this conversation ...
"fees represent approximately 0.000001% of the reason why SF rents are higher than somewhere rather more than an hour away from the city."
One wonders where, exactly, you came up with that nonsensical percentage?
Horse hockey.
I've put in my own such "system upgrades" for years here in Sonoma, not 35 miles north-north-east of San Francisco. No permits required. And in Palo Alto before that.
It's TheCity&County looking to fill the coffers, in such cases. This is most of the reason that your typical one-bed, one-bath flat in an aging decrepit converted Victorian four-plex costs more to rent per month than actually purchasing a home and paying the mortgage not 25 miles from San Francisco.
Yes, my insurance company inspects my new installs (I insist on it!). No issues to date.
... but I certainly used Radio Shack parts in the 1960s and '70s.
Kids these days have absolutely zero idea how electronics work ... and that is a crying shame. Probably part of the reason why so-called "social media"is so popular. Kids have nothing better to do in their spare time, because they don't know anything different.
"Hello fandroid."
If you are assuming I'm a google fan, you'd be wrong. Very wrong.
"What a fanatically ridiculous comment."
Just telling it like I see it, with my own eyes, on a daily basis.
"Considering you probably don't know anyone with Apple kit."
I live in the Northern part of the San Francisco Bay Area. Damn near all the yuppies up here are constantly flashing their latest bit o'Apple kit to be seen with. I just laugh and/or point & giggle at the mindless sheeple.
On the bright side, they pay me an arm and a leg to fix their B0rken BSDOSX systems when they get in over their neatly coifed heads.