Re: Pot Kettle Blackhat .... and a Foretaste of A.N.Other Shade of Foreshadow* to Favour ....
Things have changed a trifle in 30 years. You can try on this one. It's online, if you know where to look. Enjoy :-)
26689 publicly visible posts • joined 7 Jun 2007
You were clearly talking about the Foreshadow vulnerability in the paragraph I was replying to, amfM. Last time I checked, DEC kit doesn't have that particular problem. Nor does anything else non-Intel.
Note that I didn't say I liked Excel. I don't. In fact, I never use it. Not for over ten years.
However, the reality is that for the vast majority of users it is behaving exactly the way they need/want it to behave. And for the few who don't like the default behavio(u)r, it can be changed to whatever they want it to do (in this particular case, anyway).
But no. Instead the gene researchers are going to change the nomenclature that the entire planet has been using for decades. Who, exactly, is going to re-write (and then pay to publish & distribute) all of the textbooks and other documentation to reflect this change? Or are they going to turn it into a giant clusterfuck because they can't be arsed to learn how to use the proper tool for the job?
If the job is important to you, LEARN TO PROPERLY USE THE PROPER FUCKING TOOLS TO DO THAT JOB OR BE PREPARED TO FAIL MISERABLY! How fucking hard is this to understand?
"t can make it much more obvious where changes / outliers are. you look down the column of red and see a blue indicates a different gene snip that can possibly indicate the faulty \ different gene sequence."
That is trivial to do in vim or XEMACS. Has been since the 16-bit days. On 4 megs of RAM. (Well, at least 8 meg for EMACS + 4 more for the GUI, of course ... and back then vim was Stevie & ran on an Atari ST.)
Cats? What cats? ElReg must have automatically killfiled the cats because The Beaky Ones have decided that that's the way most users want to see the thread.
Try to think about what I just typed in the context of this conversation before taking it literally. Perhaps have a beer while you cogitate. I'll get this round in.
It's not the tool. It's the choice of tool. The tool is doing EXACTLY what it was designed to do. It is hardly the tool's fault that it doesn't do what somebody expects it to do.
It amazes me that some readers of this august forum seemingly expect the tool to read the mind of the user, and then do that thing instead of what it was programmed to do.
So let me get this straight ... if you order the fish at a steakhouse, and you actually received fish (as ordered) instead of steak you bitch to the waiter about it "because everybody knows that you eat steak at a steakhouse"? That's hardly sensible, now is it?
Be very careful what you wish for ... DWIM functionality causes far more headaches than it fixes. See modern autocorrection if you're not old enough to remember Damn Warren's Infernal Machine.
"However, in the real world, people use what’s at hand or what they’re familiar with."
Of course. But it's still not the tool's fault when somebody tightens the wheel-bearing nuts on a Dana 60 with a Stillson wrench (for the uninitiated, that's the proper name for your common or garden pipe wrench).
Veeeerrrrrryyyy carefully, at least in today's atmosphere of word censorship at the drop of your knickers a hat.
More to the point, when are they going to get rid of such symbols as BRCA (Breast Cancer)? It is clearly micro aggression, indicating Gene researchers want all women to wear burkas.
For the humo(u)r impaired, that's .... ah, forget it.
"Americans will wake up when their iphone costs $10,000, and their clothes cost $500 for a shirt."
I'm pretty certain that you can already pay upwards of $10,000 for a fancy phone, and last time I checked it was pretty easy to spend twice that $500 on a shirt ... and pre-washed, "distressed", falling apart at the seams jeans can be even more expensive. Worse, it would seem that hoi polloi actually lust after these 'orribly expensive useless bits of haberdashery.
And they wonder why we can't have nice things ...
"Internal investments in hiring more skilled security people in-house, using better tools, and mandating a secure development lifecycle has a much higher return-on-investment than letting the public do the bug detection work for you after."
One word: DUH!
And that doesn't even begin to cover the bad PR that Redmond has generated for itself over the last couple decades, releasing crappy code as a matter of course to keep sales and marketing happy.
Code which comes from companies which are run by marketing have a distinctly worse security track record than code that comes from pretty much everywhere else. All of the outfits listed are run by marketing.
Wait ... are you actually suggesting that current code derived from old code has holes, but it's OK, because security was less stringent when the old code was written?
The difference is that in theory your phone isn't constantly recording ... and if it is, chances are it's in your pocket or purse, and the sound is muffled and/or drowned out by whatever is rubbing up against the microphone. These glasses have a constantly on microphone, and they constantly feed that sound to Amazon.
And the last thing I want is somebody else's Amazon device picking up my voice and recording it somewhere in Amazon Space for them to triangulate digitally later. I'm not paranoid (but I'm getting there) ... I'm more pragmatic, I know what computers are capable of, and getting better at week to week.
The only reason anyone said anything like that about mobile phones was the costs involved ... both the initial purchase price, and the ongoing service charges made them cost prohibitive for normal people.
When I first got issued my portable (mid '80s), the general consensus was "That's cool! I wish I could afford one!"[0]. Nobody, and I mean nobody, worried about personal security/liberty issues[1].
[0] To which I replied "I wish I could afford it, too ... this is a company phone."
[1] We did, however, worry about always being on the corporate leash ... and demanded (and received) compensation for that, just like we had for pagers before. Can any of all y'all say the same about your company demanding you be on-call 24/7?
Actually, most open and concealed carry type folks are pro-privacy and anti- all and sundry recording damn near everything for their corporate lords and masters. The Stasi would have loved something like this bolted to the heads of their informers. I'm sure the NSA is drooling.
How often does Amazon delete interactions with Alexa Echo devices? The default answer is never, they save all of it forever. One has to jump through hoops to get Amazon to get rid of it. Which, of course, virtually no consumer will bother doing.
Have you tried poking the question "How do I get rid of the Skype icon in System Tray?" into DDG? The third option down is this page.
I suspect the remote background colo(u)r issue can be resolved in a similar way, but I can't be arsed to look.
Why do people think that using placeholders to mask letters somehow magically changes the word into something non-profane? We (TINW) know you meant fuck, so fucking type fuck. If some fucker can't handle it, they can fucking leave.
Or we can let the fuckheads who pretend to be easily shocked take over.
Just updated the computer in the barn (to Firefox 78.1.0esr running on kernel 5,4,54). Firefox 78.0.2esr had been running non-stop on kernel 5.4.51 since July 10th. It had been rather heavily used in those three weeks of uptime. There was no sign of memory being gobbled up &etc.
The dev box here in the office that I use to keep an eye on things like this has similarly seen none of the issues that you describe. Bleeding edge kernel & Firefox, updated sometimes daily.
I suspect there is something else wrong with your computer.
"Someone write a news site where I can literally filter this stuff out."
We had that capability in Larry Wall's rn news reader. Back in 1985ish.
There are perl modules that allow it and could, in theory, be grafted into the ElReg interface fairly easily, but for some reason ElReg has decided that killfiles aren't necessary for most of us. Rumo(u)r has it that ElReg staffers have the capability (hi, Mr. Pott), and it seems to me that it was extended to gold badge members (beta only?) several years ago.
Me, I use wetware to filter out bozos. Seems cleaner somehow.
How dare you keep a rock as a pet! Rock ownership is tantamount to slavery, and rocks are meant to be free! If it's a very old or infirm rock, and has trouble getting around and otherwise fending for itself, I could condone one becoming the guardian of the rock, but ownership is despicable. You should be ashamed of yourself!
No actual rocks were hurt, physically or emotionally, during the production of this satire. All complaints should be directed to the Circular File Department, Bit Bucket Division.