Re: Chris Inglis hasn't read Asimov
Have a beer, compadre.
29377 publicly visible posts • joined 7 Jun 2007
No, of course not. One cannot commit that kind of crime against an AI, not when its wrangler(s) is/are actively and intentionally setting out to collect any and all data for it's so-called "training".
To say nothing of the fact that no AI is a legal entity, and thus can not be charged with a crime.
Nah. At some point, the investors will see they are being scammed and the money will start flowing the other way as people dump the stock. At that point a full-blown AI winter will be upon us (again), and nobody will trust the concept (again) for a couple decades (again).
Or until someone dreams up a new name for it. Maybe they'll try Machine Learning (again). Etc. (again).
I've been blocking (and/or filtering) go ogle for about a quarter century now. Doesn't seem to have negatively affected my Internet experience any.
I block many of your so-called "residential IPs" similarly, as I run across them allowing stupidity. I will run a white-list for a handful of people who I trust, but for the most part the providers who allow such activity are bad net.neighbors anyway, so the blocking does me no harm. Same for clueless VPN providers.
Note that I'm not content blocking. I block network abusers. What their traffic DOES, not what their traffic IS.
I don't have a blog/vlog/whatever. Never have. Never will. The Wife says it's because I'm not narcissistic enough.
Just block their entire IP ranges from accessing your systems as you encounter them. Same tactic as used for anti-spam efforts. It won't get rid of the problem entirely, but it will stuff them into their own little Balkan State, where they can play with themselves until the bubble busts.
Seems to be working for me & mine ... and the piece and quiet is quite pleasant.
... (or any other anti-social media site) to be a source for official propaganda government announcements, anyway?
Meta (and the other anti-social media sites) aren't considered a source[0] by anyone with a clue, any more than Trump is.
Why government idiots officials keep trying to change this is beyond me[1] ... Shirley every government on the planet should say "We own our own Internet access and WWW servers. All official comments by us will be found on our equipment, and only on our equipment. Period. ... and then follow through with it.
[0] If you don't know what "source" means in this context, this conversation is over your head.
[1] Except the US Republican Party, who all seem to think that "likes" (whatever that means) are more important than actual votes ...
... in places you (might) least expect it.
Part of pen testing is proving to the C*s that human stupidity knows no bounds, and that they are not immune ... I once found a comprehensive list of machine names and login/password pairs written in sharpie on the underside of the leaves of a faux ficus in the office of the secretary of a VP. They included complete access to the corporate mainframes various LPARs (including HR and R&D). Quite a few people got reamed, and I'm absolutely certain that Amdahl's internal security culture was much better by the time Fujitsu bought them ...
Several years ago I was at a local tractor parts store. The owner was having trouble with his ancient POS system. After a couple minutes of swearing at technical help, and at least one "turn it off and then on again", he hung up the phone and dug under the counter and came up with an old pad of blank invoices. He allowed as to how he would have to hand write it because the computer was broken. Being me, I asked if I could have a look at it. He looked at me funny, because he's only known me as a rancher/farmer, but said OK.
I came around the counter & eyeballed the situation. Turned out the mouse didn't work. At all. Just an immobile mouse pointer in the center of the screen. I showed the guy the tab key and a couple other keyboard shortcuts for future reference, and took a closer look. The drivers were loaded, and running. Probably a dead mouse (tractor parts counters are rough on everything). I just happened to have a spare serial mouse out in the truck (don't you?). Pulled the mini-maglite out of my pocket & dove under the counter to swap 'em out ... only to discover that the original mouse had managed to work itself loose. So I plugged it back in, and all was well with the world.
Well over ten years of daily use, and the computer had to wait until I was in the shop to spit out it's mouse. Now one of the biggest gossips in the county knows I'm a computer guy. Hopefully he'll keep it to himself ... (In the eight or so years since the above happened, he has called me three times for computer work ...and never told anybody I'm a computer guy. Starting a couple years ago, I've been giving him a good bottle of whiskey (or whisky) at Xmas as a thank you for keeping quiet.)
Dumb users are to be coddled, at least occasionally ... We had a gal who could break any software in less than five minutes at the keys. She was an 'orrible computer user because she broke them accidentally, not a malicious or mean bone in her body.
HOWEVER, I discovered she had the raw talent to be able to recreate the steps she took to crash the thing. We pulled her into software QA pronto ...
See Midnight Commander, a clone of the old MS-DOS utility Norton Commander, that has been tweaked for the *nix environment. It's a useful tool, and a lot more powerful than it looks at first glance. I use it near daily, and have done for around 30 years. 40 years if you include the DOS version from Norton. Try typing mc at a command prompt. Recommended.
Free tip: Be extremely careful if you choose to run mc as root ... it will do exactly what you tell it to do. Don't say I didn't warn you.
DOS 3.3 came out in 1987. Mark Williams Company's Coherent was released in 1980, but consumers had to wait until 1983 to purchase it directly. It was a pretty good learning tool, and could be used for light UNIX development work ... and was over-all much better than the MS/PC-DOS of the day.
For the adventurous, at around that time, shell accounts on BSD systems were usually available for the asking at your local Uni, even if you weren't currently going to school there.
For folks with money burning a hole in their pocket (or a Boss who knew a good use of a budget!), the so- called "AT&T UNIX PC" was a real UNIX machine that one could use at home in the early '80s. I lucked into a later model in the mid 80s, the 3B/1. Came with all of 2Megs of RAM and a 67Meg HDD and was very usable ... ran SysVR2 with a lot of 4.xBSD improvements.
For some facts & figures, see Hobbes Internet Timeline.
If you want graphs, scroll towards the bottom.
HIT was considered canonical for quite a number of years, at least for the time period(s) listed. Probably still is.
I think if you look you'll discover that the git in question was indeed the bloke who revoked free use of Bitkeeper, forcing Linus to build a new distributed revision control system that could handle the needs of the fine folks maintaining the kernel. From scratch. In a hurry. git was self-hosting in 4 days, and went "live" handling the kernel in about two months.
It wasn't until much later that Linus claimed that he, himself, was the git in question ("I name all my projects after myself."), but the folks who were in the trenches at the time know better.
You give them too power, amfM ... All I do is block their IP range(s), and encourage others to do the same.
Let 'em play in their own little balkan states until they get it out of their system, while us Adults continue to use the rest of the Internet in peace and quiet.
The coming bubble bursting and resulting AI Winter will help immeasurably.