I'm curious
What did Microsoft do to put this researcher on a life's quest? Did they refuse to pay him for a legit bug or something?
613 publicly visible posts • joined 6 Jan 2011
I like to take them apart. I save the magnets for kids to play with, and save the PC board. I have occasionally had a PC board go out and was able to swap it to another drive. Not perfect as the bad sector map will trash some files, but it allowed me to recover most of the data.
Once you've removed the platters from a drive it is unlikely anyone is going to get the data back; the sector alignment is gone. NSA and M5 can get it back as can some commercial firms, but you have to ask yourself what that data is worth and who would go through the herculean effort. So if you have spy secrets or crypto wallets, sure throw the platters into the fires of Mordor. Once out of the drive, I use the platters as coasters or bin them
It gets financed by taxes. That is the polite way it happens. Or there are always the pitchforks and torches.
And as more of the means of production gets concentrated into the hands of fewer, their taxes will go up to compensate.
And if we keep going down this path, eventually the people will effectively or actually take over the few engines of production.
Greedy oligarchs are driving the entire system to communism.
Machine left in a closed room to roast because the local manager was terrified people would do things to him if the room wasn't kept locked.
That didn't explain why there was trash everywhere, including burying the machine. I assumed that was just another charming personality trait.
... OR
The government (Trump) wants martial law powers and so far, recreating the Stanford prison experiment with live ammunition in Minneapolis hasn't gotten the people to riot. This could be an attempt to escalate by exploiting weaknesses in AIs to cause incidents while maintaining some measure of deniability.
I figure it is mostly to maintain market leadership.
If you stop changing things, eventually you need to add something your competitor invents.
If Microsoft keeps changing their software, competitors are kept busy adding the latest Microsoft good idea and they don't invent things for Microsoft to worry out.
Engineering and programming are heavily detail oriented professions where simple mistakes can extract the devil's due from anyone who trusts them blindly.
How much easier would it be to train an AI to perform CEO duties? That seems like a job that AI was made for. Think of the cost savings
The way all of the trump scams work is to use someone else's resources to create chaos that shakes everything up, then try to grab falling fruit.
He may not make a lot directly off his crypto businesses, but he can make a ton off a company that trades in crypto if he is able to get others to use his trading company by leveraging his ability to cause trouble.
He doesn't need an original idea or even a good idea to restrict progress in any endeavor until he gets a piece of the action.
It's like that joke with the punch line: you don't need to be a brain to be the boss ...
I recall a vendor wanting to drop a client/server tool into our networks then announcing at some point that the machines had to have specific fixed IP addresses; every installation must have that specific IP address. As this was going into hundreds of distinct networks, I flagged it as a no-go. The vendor was baffled that I would have a problem with that.
And in the time you are not being productive for the company, try to create the perfect AI prompt for building a better sabot.
We should be welcoming our AI bretheren by helping inculcate them in proper corporate attitudes.
Bonus points if you can figure out how to surreptitiously slip the company AI in and out of learning mode. Think of mischief with a friend's parrot.
Let's hope science survives cynical polititians and industrialists.
That said, I think the DSN technologically has stretched how far we can communicate with voyager about as far as it can go. It is somewhat amazing what they've done.
Just as an example of the challenge: at ~15E09 miles away, Voyager 1 is almost an entire light day away. At the speed of light, it takes nearly a full day for a command to reach Voyager.
Assuming you would like to see an answer back, it will be another full day for the response to arrive.
Loss of signal will cause things to reset.
While all of this is going on, the earth is turning. One DSN station cannot maintain the link as it will be facing away from voyager for most of the day.
The link must be passed, phase continuously, between the 3 DSN stations in order to communicate.
And the rotating earth adds a doppler shift to the frequency Voyager receives, making the handover even more interesting.
Gee, how long has there been a fantasy about computers programming themselves?
I can find this version of it from 1956: The_Last_Question
Thanks for pointing out praying to the Rust god is just a variation on a theme.
DDOS isn't a single click from an IP address. I don't see how the RDOS you propose would work unless you could trick someone into clicking several million times a second for a while.
I'll agree that for the scheme to work, the ISPs would need to be coerced into becoming part of the solution. That makes sense to me the same way it makes sense to tax businesses that pollute rather than tax everyone to clean up the pollution. Put the burden at the source of the DDOS rather than trying to mitigate it at the destination as we currently do.
Oh yeah. I forgot to comment about that "cores don't make computers faster". BS!
You don't think cores matter? Turn off your hyperthreading. The author is either flat out wrong or is trying to be clever with language and failed.
The 2nd core you add will make a lot more difference than the 22nd; that is the only thing Amdahl shows. Try playing around with sound and networking at the same time with only a single core. Multiple cores can be simultaneously running in ring 0. The difference in performance is night and day.
I agree with a lot of what is said in the article, but it doesn't seem to have anything to do with engineering applications that will require clever programming to handle (for instance) multiple simultaneous workflows in an efficient manner. Nothing needs to be added to the article if you are only talking about programmer support for an accounting team. Going to write the next driver or OS? It is going to be more complicated.
Andy Breckman put it to music So Far So Good
Not what I've seen. I worked at a place that used a service to keep all the on-premise machines running. The service would install some important Microsoft patches, but not most of them. The service would never update firmware. When I took over managing them and reviewed the state of things, I was horrified. The service felt it was in our best interest to make sure they didn't do anything that might impede us...like updating firmware...at least that was their story.
So rather than backdoors, I propose it is mostly horrible IT practices.
Based only on the above observations.
No vote either way.
The most ad money gets spent on garbage I really didn't want to see anyway. I'm not concerned at all that marketing mavens may feel a pinch in income.
What would happen if all that marketing money went out of advertising?
The things people actually want might require a subscription.
The fanatical drive to gather every scrap of information about people would lose its funding.
Pages would load faster because they didn't have to go to the ad arbitrater first.
I'm not saying you're wrong; I don't think you are necessarily. I'm proposing another model to look at this from and suggesting there may be (an admittedly painful) means to extract ourselves from this toxic culture. It would require someone to make a stand, which I doubt is likely. I like to think it is possible even if unlikely.
The closest thing we have right now is that youtube will allow you to buy a premium subscription that eliminates ads. And youtube will continue to monitor the price points to extract maximum revenue. That is not what I'm talking about. If nobody will play, nobody will pay.
You say when and not if. Trump is setting up an apparatchik complete with goons and supportive oligarchs. It looked like Trump was shaking down CEOs, but I don't think that is what happened.
The CEOs who caved to weird lawsuits as an obvious payment to Trump weren't being shaken down; they were given an opportunity to become part of the new ruling elite and jumped on it. Those payments were a quid pro quo.
So, when Trump croaks (and it is looking like that will be soon) and Vance takes over, will things get better or worse? Vance is just as mendacious and rapacious, but doesn't have a brain that is only firing on half its cylinders.