
Re: How about FTTP for urbal locations, OpenReach?
14.4?? Is that kilobits? What modem standard from last century is that again?
119 publicly visible posts • joined 22 Dec 2010
Laws, like, say, the GDPR (UK GDFPR for us brits), which say that data controllers require permission, and which setting do not track clearly signals to the website that we do not grant permission for the data dragnet to be used and clearly fall within the gdpr meaning for witholding consent??
This is a poor move by Mozilla and I'm hoping an addon quickly adds it back in.
Sorry to 'well Aktuwalleee' but I don't know of any internal combustion engined car that does not have a 'heater core' for cabin heating..albeit fed heat via the engine coolant loop which will send most of the waste heat to the radiator once the engine is at proper operating temperature
So you are kind of correct, but not technically correct.
Have a beer anyway ---------->
I find it interesting that El Reg is ignoring the lack of actual privacy in this" 'Privacy' Sandbox" falsely titled Personal Data Grab update
Rather than just being able to disable third party tracking cookies like in any browser that doesn't treat you, the user, as the product for their advertiser customers, Google decide to make it so that only they are able to sell you the the highest bidder.
The alternative to not being tracked across the web via third party tracking cookies is NOT to be tracked across the web by Google instead.
You may have read the article, but I did too, either I'm going blind or you are hallucinating when you allege that she was using 'arm' logos based on what the article said.
Also there is no allegation that 'other things to give the impression it was associated with Arm.' were present on these domains.
Perhaps you were reading a different article?
Perhaps you have further verifiable information that would add to this story?
You would have thought that the BOFH and Kelvin would have a long-standing understanding, or else it would be all out war, possibly involving armed autonomous death robots equipment delivery devices.
That's assuming the PFY doesn't take matters into his own hands before Simon even considered it...
Whilst I wouldn't put it so crudely, I came here to say the same thing. There's a war going on, and one side has shown it has very little in the way of morality.
Surely it's common sense to consider security ramifications of allowing potentially compromised or actually bad actors or their accounts access to modify and possibly compromise n different software sources? Risk mitigation is a prudent course of action
The big difference in the supermarket is that it is a public place... With no reasonable expectation of privacy.
You could order your Pappa John's cardboard circle whilst stark naked (best to don some type of clothing when you accept the delivery though...)
Can't do that in a supermarket
Has'Troof' social for 50 million fools to sign up then?
Another though here is this: doesn't the minimum 50 million subscribers bit fall afoul of the equal protection amendment thing? ("We're treating you differently to these other folks because, all else being equal, this arbitrary number means we want to")
Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Ceausescu... 'far'left', just stop it with the 'the left creates monsters too' bs. People who use the 'communism' schtick to justify why they should be dictators are not 'far left', they're simply opportunist thugs. Similarly Communism isn't 'far left', its just another way of hoodwinking the masses. I'm surprised you left Hitler out with his National 'Socialism' in your tripe.
Firstly I think the article is remiss for not listing the Windscale/Sellafield (not letting a name change hide it is important) nuclear incident. Also lacking is coverage of some of the contamination caused by previous poorly though out adventures in nuclear power (in my opinion driven mainly by decisions taken more with an eye to production of nuclear weapons then with power production)
With that we clearly need more nukes, just a safer kind and one that can also use the by-products of earlier nuclear projects as fuel, without enabling more weapons production.
The problem as I see it is both that that we don't have the technology mastered, and the political will is lacking both from a Greenpeace contaminated pr standpoint and vested interests in the nuclear industry wanting nothing more than a rent seeking (for them) solution. See for example the quite ridiculous attempts to finish the current nuclear power projects underway in this country.
This article is rather credulous in stating both of those lines. As what tends to play out in the system of government that they use in the larger China means that Xi will have 'allies' and 'friends' to whom he is beholden.
This is without mentioning the ultimate beneficiaries of all the factories overseen by their military.
This is also overlooking the endemic corruption that their system is 'lubricated' with.
Ahh idiot manglers who won't back down even though their idea is proven to be useless.
The world is full of them, and sadly full of idiot manglers higher up who fall for their nonsense despite those at the sharp end telling the truth....
Just because it precludes free lunches by people taking and redstributing it without granting the users of the redistribution the same rights as the person redistributing it does not make it a problem for interoperability. you can have your cake and it it with the gpl, just no cherry picking. :p
I would have to agree. Intel are unsurprisingly in the Risc-V game only for what they can get out of it. I suppose the fact that they are not a charity and want to maintain long term dominance of at least one sector of computing is all the explanation they need.