re: Oh my... #
"The district court found that the Cole claims in suit read on a system disclosed in German, French, and British patents issued to Dirks between 1948 and 1957, none of which were considered by the examiner during the prosecution of the Cole patent application.
The district court agreed with HLA's assertion that "The Dirks system ... is the Cole system implemented in 1940's technology, and, since the Cole claims are drawn to cover all digital systems generically, as opposed to a new implementation, they are anticipated by [the] foreign Dirks' patents."
The principal issue in Appeal No. 83-782 is whether the district court correctly found that claims 1, 2, and 3 of RCA's patent, covering a digital video character generator, are anticipated by the disclosure in the "Dirks" patents. We reverse the holding of invalidity in view of Dirks alone.
http://openjurist.org/730/f2d/1440/rca-corp-v-applied-digital-data-systems-inc-lear-siegler-inc
"Data General also contends that the Cole patent was anticipated by the prior art and by a printed publication stored at the Stanford Research Institute"
http://de.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.19880715_0000048.DDE.htm/qx
"The following stuff is from Electronics magazine, Jan. 3rd 1958 issue .. Generating Characters: Summary Although may plans have been devised in the past for scribing numeric and alphabetic characters on a scope face by spot deflection"
http://www.nixiebunny.com/crtgen/crtgen.html