2014?
Is that really 2014 and not 2013? The pace of Atom development is truly pathetic, the door is wide open for ARM to own this segment.
4199 publicly visible posts • joined 6 Jun 2007
As already mentioned, flying at altitude is in Flight Levels which are nominally 100's of feet, based on the standard sea level pressure of 1013.25mb. When the pressure at sea level is lower the actual is height is also lower, and when the pressure is higher the height is higher.
The only time the height in 1000's of feet is used, is when the crew make announcements to the passengers. If it was thought that the passengers would understand meters or even linguines better, then they are free to use that instead.
AC@17:42 writes: Have seen at least one web development contract where customer requirement dictates x86_64 but no reason whatsoever for that.
There are a number of reasons for specifying x86_64 instead of x86_32 over and above the 64bit memory handling, such as more registers and additional instructions.
A single /8 wastes just 3 potential IPv4 addresses. 65536 separate /24s would be wasting 196608 potential addresses; while 1048576 separate /28s would be wasting a whopping 3145728 addresses!
Or again; a non publicly routeable /8 wastes the full 16,777,216 potential addresses.
Kevin Johnston wrote:
I would rather have 20 or 100 ANPR cameras rather than one speed camera
You do know that at the push of a button the ANPR system could be turned in to the worlds biggest average speed camera system? Unlike SPECs systems which calculate average speeds between two points on one road, ANPR can calculate the average speed between any two cameras in the country. If that worked out faster than they thought was legally possible, you could be issued with a speeding ticket. They aren't doing that now, but could very easily in the future.
"Did you know pre-watershed nudity IS allowed?"
I do now; I was eating dinner so wasn't quick enough with the remote control to switch over before the pointless short slot the comes after Channel 4 news. There was a full frontal of some bloke on the screen, and it put me right off my sausage and mash.
I've seen the rabbit through the cat flap technique. He knew with it being in his mouth barely able to straddle it to walk, there was no way it was going through the cat flap, so he turned around, reversed through the cat flap holding by its neck. The last thing I saw was a bunny sitting with its back to the flap, and suddenly jerking backwards inside - followed a few seconds later by a scream from the missus.
It wouldn't have had to wait, after dropping off it could either have followed a pre-set path until it ran out of fuel. But looking at the end of the simulation video, I'm not the crane is stable without the load of the lander underneath it, so a crash may have been the only option.
It's a shame they had to crash it at all. With 140kg of fuel left after dropping off the rover, it could have taken a bit of a flying tour around the crater looking for good places for the rover to visit - if it had been fitted with its own camera that is. Failing that, just performing a soft landing like the Vikings did, would have gained some data which could be useful to future (manned) missions.
Having read the Interim Report I just don't understand how the board and shareholders at Nokia could have let Elop completely and utterly destroy the the company. He's doing worse than his former (supposedly) employer Microsoft reducing the value of Aquantive from $6.3bn to $0.1bn in 5 years. If it were a Japanese company, every last one of them would have committed seppuku by now.
That's over 17 years, and it is funded by "Europe", so for the sake of argument let's say 15 countries, to err on the conservative side.
It's funded by 20 countries, but the contributions are by no means equal. The top 3 contributors; Germany, Fance and Britain contribute over 50%, and the top 6 represent over 75%. See Cern 2010 budget.
“The last thing the internet community wants to see is China breaking away, so it has a lot of leverage,” he said.
Really? There would be hell of a lot of people in internet security who would be happier if the great firewall stopped state sponsored traffic getting out, rather than user content getting in.
Technically active shutter will work when you are lying down, as the glasses will deliver a different image to each eye, but your brain wont be able to make any sense of it, as Haku says, because stereoscopic images are designed to be viewed with the head vertical. With passive glasses once you tilt your head by more than a few degrees the polarisation no longer prevents both images being seen by each eye, giving a very blurred image.