Re: Another reality
That's why the article mentioned running bug bounty programs on other companies software. They might not raise CVE's themselves to be able to compete for USG contracts, but their competitors sure as hell will.
4200 publicly visible posts • joined 6 Jun 2007
Thanks Liam, when it next appears from the old laptop graveyard under the sofa, I'll give that a try.
I think our his & hers EEE PCs are still under there too, last seen running Debian 8 with LDXE, so might see if they'll run x86 Raspbian.
KDE was known as memory hog when the machines RAM was still measured in MB rather than KB, but rather than shrinking their footprint what they have done is resist the bloat that the others, particular gnome, seems to have acquired over the years.
Back in the 2000's I used to run KDE on the high spec machines at work, but my more modest home system struggled, which lead me too picking Mate desktop. But well done to the KDE developers for opening up the choice of desktops to all classes of machine.
The later Atoms do run 64 bit OS's, but with limited cache and memory sizes they run noticeably slower than 32 bit OS.
I dual booted Linux Mint 32 bit and 64 bit variants on an old Atom N450 netbook until 32 bit was dropped after version 19. The 32 bit OS being just about usable on such a low spec machine, the 64 bit OS was actually a little quicker when first booted, but then a lot slower when a few applications were running - the maximum of 2GB of RAM being the real killer.
When I said the people behind Tornado Cash should be up on charges https://forums.theregister.com/forum/all/2022/08/08/treasury_sanctions_tornado_cash_korea, I got down voted by the crypto-shills, luckily no one was listening to them.
At my last company to Windows, I had to call IT at least every 2 months to get they key for the Bitlocker recovery screen. With a Linux only policy ever since, not a single problem with LUKS, and I've resized various partitions on the encrypted disc twice.
Well the government keeps going back to the same large IT companies time and time again, no matter how much of an unmitigated disaster the previous projects have been, so I doubt if mere security issues are going to persuade them to ditch these serial cock-up merchants.
Oddly, the performance hit is not mentioned in the known issues for the May 24 or June 14 emissions for Windows 11 or Windows Server 2022, but at least Microsoft has come clean now, meaning those wondering why that server or laptop was running slow have an answer.
The reason was running slow is always Windows, I'm sure people are beyond caring exactly which bit.
I did point this out last week here https://forums.theregister.com/forum/all/2022/07/26/alibaba_dual_primary_listing
Got the same rant from LordRobot then too.
So you push the usual bundle of features, bug fixes and security patches to a 1000 or a million users, and how long to you wait for problems to show up? A day, a week? In the mean time all those security patches are being reverse engineered by blackhats and exploits developed and deployed before those updates go off to the other 100s millions of users.
Treating users like guinea pigs is no substitute for QA.
We shouldn't forget the role the ISS plays in education and inspiring new generations of engineers and scientists. My 8 year old was lucky enough to put a question to Samantha Cristoforetti live on the ISS from the Farnborough International Airshow, I kept saying to him after, you've just talked to someone in actual space!
Another reason is the possibility of Chinese companies being delisted from US exchanges if they fail to be transparent about their company ownership https://www.theregister.com/2022/05/05/sec_delisting_china/
I've upgraded the OS which ran on the original 256MB Raspberry Pi all the way up to Bullseye now running on a Pi 4B, but I now want to take it to 64 bit without reinstalling. There is some stuff out there about how to migrate x86 Debian from 32 to 64 bit, but some notes from the master would be much appreciated.
There are very competent developers in out sourced companies, but their primary role is to front each new contract and move on to the next, leaving you with the far less competent ones.
We had a great developer come over from India to do a proof of concept for a contact that would involve one on site role and a team off shore. He was as sharp as a knife and exceeded expectations. After they were awarded the contract, we we told this developer would not be available for on site due to family commitments back home, but would be leading the off shore team. Which he did for about a week, after which he would still answer questions on the phone, but had had been moved on to the next project and the one after.
What were left with was another on site guy who had to clear every breath he took with the out sourcing company manager, so preferred not talk to anyone. The off shore team produced very poor quality cut and paste code, the company was only interested in ticking the boxes on a spreadsheet, and not delivering anything close to a useable product.
Luckily we only wasted 3 months of money before pulling the plug.
The UK is not a Tech leader. Europe is a tech leader,
You forgot the joke icon, unless you are talking about the EUs litigation against tech leaders.
But anyway you really need to get that chip off your shoulder about ARM - it's really tedious.