Re: most of the time Azure is the better option
Whoever downvoted the above, really does have their head in the clouds...
...and Microsoft's hand up their arse.
4203 publicly visible posts • joined 6 Jun 2007
That's for putting in the drawer and never using again, as luckily they still supply a proper remote with lots of buttons on it.
HOWEVER, my Samsung Q90 puts up a message asking why aren't you using the magic remote about 20 seconds after switching on, and during the 10 seconds it is on screen, you can't use the standard remote - WTF?
Fear of missing out on Quantum is just the same play as the fear of missing out on the Strategic Defence Initiative, and look how that worked out for the evil empire - spunked trillions and collapsed economically, we then found out it was all bullshit. The same is going to happen again with quantum, but who is doing the bullshitting this time?
The accuracy of your car sat nav is nowhere near 10cm, 3m if you are lucky. It only appears more accurate because it can snap you to not just the road, but the correct side of the road depending on the direction of travel - most of the time.
I had an early sat nav where you could turn off snap to road, it was interesting driving along and seeing its apparent position wandering off over fields.
I had been using WinCE since I bought my first Medion PDA SatNav from Aldi, which was just as capable as the competition but a fraction of the price. I went on to develop for WinCE devices which made it very easy to port over Win32 applications. I got to try out a large range of WinCE / Pocket PC devices such as HP iPaq's and the early Windows Mobile phones. My favourite device was the Dell Axim X50 (as pictured in the article), with it's 480x640 screen (when most were still 240x320) it made a great general purpose PDA, and could be paired with a Bluetooth GPS puck to act as my updated SatNav. I took this a step further, buying an extended battery and aviation chart software so I could use it when flying. I still navigated primarily using paper charts as that was more fun, but it was great for planning the route and wind corrections using a spreadsheet I developed, and recording the tracks of where you had been for displaying in Google Earth in 3D on a PC. I took my future wife flying on our first date, and later found the flightpath went directly over the island which was our first home.
Intel did have an architecture licence, and look what they did with it; XScale - the worse ARM core ever. They took all good work DEC did on the StrongARM and threw it away, coming up with a chip with a hideously slow memory system, a core they clearly did not understand, littered with unnecessary barriers crippling the pipeline, and a huge number of bugs - the errata was larger than the entire manuals for any of ARMs own designs.
It wasn't that Intel sold off the ARM division because it didn't know what to do with it, but I think it was more the embarrassment of doing such a bad job.
Microsoft and signals intelligence agency the Australian Signals Directorate last week announced plans to create the "Microsoft-Australian Signals Directorate Cyber Shield (MACS)".
The best way the Australian Signals Directorate can shield their cyber operations is to ditch Microsoft and get MACs.
I'm very much a fan of "every tool does one job and does it well", but the vast majority of PDFs I come across are on the web, and I want to display them in a tab along with all the other web content. For example bank statements, they appear in an FF tab rather than launching another application on top, or worse having to save and open then from a file manager. Should I want to do more than look at the PDF, I can always launch a separate application at that point.
I ported a full desktop screen reader to PDAs running Windows CE and later phones with Windows Mobile 6, but I had left by the time WM7 broke everything. It had support for magnification, speech synthesis and Bluetooth keyboards, which gave visually impaired users the ability to use standard applications on the move, which was quite revolutionary.
The big advantage of the platform for developers was the back-end code was very easy to port from the desktop version. The few NT and later APIs not supported by CE could be substituted with older Windows 9x code that was still in source control. The difficult bit was the user interface on the tiny low res screens of the time, I just converted all the big dialog boxes to tall thin scrollable ones, and passed it on to someone else to make usable.
The big disadvantage of the platform for the users was it was trying to be a miniature desktop device which didn't stand a chance of succeeding against the touch focused UIs designed specifically for mobile devices.
They found that fewer than 6 percent of businesses used any of those AI technologies at the time. But many large firms with more than 5,000 employees were doing so – when weighed by employment, average adoption came to more than 18 percent.
The larger the company, the more people in non-jobs there are, so it's hardly surprising that even hallucinating AI can churn out the same type of useless crap they do. Of course instead of eliminating these non productive and moral sapping positions, the C-suite can allow the dross to continue, but at a reduced cost with AI.
It's a bit rich Microsoft giving advice on ARM coding. Maybe with 64 bit ARM things are a bit different, but back when they first started supporting 32 bit ARM on Windows CE, their compiler was SHIT. I've never seen code generation as bad or as buggy as that. Even versions 3 or 4 of gcc could run rings around it, and they weren't a patch on Norcroft.