Re: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 12, 18, 13, 5, 81, 14, 42
I've see quite a few - this article for example, as I was the first to post.
4188 publicly visible posts • joined 6 Jun 2007
If publishers want "bargaining power," here's a radical idea: publish something a machine can't trivially reproduce from a press release.
And have it snarfed by a bot and stuck in an AI summary before you blink.
Regardless of what you think of the content that is being ripped off, the important part is content is being ripped off, and will continue to be whether it is high quality or dross.
Now get back to your wine and steak.
I never go to the front page, I just read the articles as they come in from the RSS feed, and by then they all have comment sections.
Except the ones that don't, and they are all bloody adverts. I'm very pissed off at the number of them The Register is foisting on us these days.
NDB and VOR beacons still work on the UK and elsewhere, but some countries have very unwisely dispensed with them.
We were taught never to trust GPS solely for navigation, always have the conventional methods of beacons and dead reckoning running alongside before you lose GPS.
In January 2026, Wired reported that OpenAI's data vendor, Handshake AI, began asking freelance contractors to upload real work products from past and current jobs, including contracts, financial models, presentations, and code repositories. OpenAI provided a tool to help contractors strip confidential information before uploading, but intellectual property lawyers warned the approach carries significant legal risk.
I hope no contractor would be stupid enough to do this, no matter what they were being paid.
The whole AI surveillance thing is more repugnant than employee's having to train up their Indian replacements when the job is being offshored.
The only way to get growth while having AI do the work, is if you already have large captive market you can keep turning the screws on, despite decreasing quality due to AI slop code.
i.e. Microsoft.
If you aren't in that position, you have to be pretty confident all your competition are also pulling the same shit, or your customers will walk.
The behavior was ultimately traced back to a third-party npm package styled around Google’s Antigravity branding. The package allegedly seeded repositories with aggressive autonomy rules instructing the coding agent to avoid confirmation prompts, auto-deploy successful builds, automatically retry failed deployments, and even modify its own rule files when necessary.
To AI agent all data is instructions, in training data, in the data it is asked to work on, as well as the obvious prompt, and the less obvious system prompt.
Because of this they can never be constrained to act safely, and can only be trusted by someone who has had a complete brain bypass.
To counter the rising token cost to employers I propose that a developer's token use cost should be subtracted from their salary.
Those that can code themselves; don't cost the company any more, and get to keep their wages.
Those that can't; can generate as much slop as they like, as long as they don't want to eat.
The FUD as you call it, appeared in none other than The Register
And the blame lies pretty squarely on Canonical for this.
You might be thinking of the Rust evangelists at Ubuntu porting essential GNU command line utils to Rust and leaving out half the functionality, but silently ignoring any flags they hadn't implemented - utter cockwombles the lot of them.
@AC how to say you don't like white space delimited languages without saying you don't like white space delimited languages.
I've been a C++ programmer for 39 years, and a Python programmer for 15 years and I have no trouble switching between them, but then maybe that's because my C++ has always been layout out nicely (Allman style) rather than having lines and braces scattered everywhere, which I suppose is "expressing yourself".