Re: Odd how what was "nonsense" is now fact.
Difference one: Big Bang is a mathematical solution
exactly, it's an intellectual solution : It is only a prolongation of a line of which Hubble has observed a local tangent, We happily extrapolate into the past more than 13 billion years, and somehow pretend that it all began at t=0 . In that, God (Yahve, Allah, Krishna, Zeus ...) is as good an explanation as a giant explosion
Difference two: Scientists are constantly testing whether something better is around, and there are some other things around which might be a better solution with more data. You cannot test your gods
nor can the scientist observe the BigBang. We can observe the remnants of the originel universe in the cosmiv microwave background that existed ... 380 000 years AFTER the BigBang. We have absolutely 0 (zero) proof of anything earlier as that, so very very very far away from the BigBang "singularity".
Difference three: No real scientists will say that that the big bang, aka singularity, is the only possible beginning, it is simply which currently fits best
you should study physics before saying such things. The current BigBang theory is in conflict with 2 scientific observations : where is anti-matter, and what is that "cosmic-inflation" thing ? Until you can explain those 2 fundamental pieces of the BigBang, that theory is simply false.