Re: You can't add arbitrary data to remove bias.
Yes, hiring is a sea of flawed data and biased processes. If you use these to train systems, and then try to correct afterwards, you are putting the cart before the horse.
18 publicly visible posts • joined 12 Oct 2010
It feels like the easiest option would be a to make this an opt-in process rather than an opt-out one? Then all the incentives would be on the organisations to simplify and standardise their processes. Disinterested users would be protected by default. Maybe allow essential cookies with penalties if somebody tried to stretch the definition of essential.
"During the mission, the Intuitive Machines team said they were concerned that the lander could get lost when they detected a faulty piece of navigation equipment." - no, they realised (by chance) that someone had forgotten to remove the safety lock from the LIDAR system. They did an epic job of patching in signals from another sensor but somebody forgot the checklist.
The problem with adding an ambiguous layer between you and what you want to do is whether you trust the AI (or rather the organisation implementing the AI) to do what is right for you or right for them? So if I ask to call someone, will it choose the cheapest option or the one that makes them the most money?