As above, so below
An extraordinarily arcane, not to mention her(m)etical, epithet.
1691 publicly visible posts • joined 12 Oct 2010
Slight tangent but I blindly double clicked on a docx document on a machine running the new macOS developer beta and the OS took it upon itself to open the document in good old Textedit. The compatibility, at least for that document with moderate formatting, was at such a level I did not even realise it had not opened under MS Word.
One observer surmised the reason for Mona Lisa’s so-called “enigmatic smile” was because she was accustomed to hiding what must have been a very bad set of teeth.
Fact is, despite all humans using the same basic facial gestures, every single one of us uses his features in different and unique ways - some subtle; some blatant. Good example, captured well, is Jeff Bridges playing an alien in Starman.
Ergo it would be a very disturbing experience for me to find my wife’s face moving and her thereby suddenly expressing herself differently. Nothing to do with the size of her nose etc.
Recall some uni some years ago suggested communication is only about 37 per cent words.
There's a limit. Usually some dickhead comes off a period of fast driving into slow to moderate traffic and thinks he is still going round Brands Hatch*. Sits on your bumper as if he could shoot past, or through, you any opportunity, This is dangerous and - do they still force you to learn "braking distances" to pass the test? - the only safe way (in traffic you cannot just move to the side and let him pass; conversely I am not preventing him from moving to another lane) is to slow down.
Even if not an outright danger to life and limb, which means slow, I choose not to be rear-ended by said dickhead, thank you, which means slower.
Agreed if this creates a tailback it is impeding flow etc but then I stick religiously to the speed limit. Most times the dickhead gets the message and, frankly, I have done him a favour.
* = Daytona?
Tch! Tch! Spreading knowledge about (a tiny part of) China, when many (including or even especially those who know Harrods now has Putonghua-speaking shop assistants) prefer the wishful thinking of China as the Fairy Kingdom where be dragons. Better to leave them (with no apologies for another gratuitous archetype) to their whippets and brass bands.
When I wor a lad there wuz still the occasional rag ‘n’ bone man plying his trade throughout London with horse and cart. Time before that such conveyances were ubiquitous : milk, beer etc
Residents didn’t mind. Shovel at the ready to give their tomatoes and beans a dollop of organic goodness.
‘Course, back then most everyone grew vegetables in the back garden.
To give perspective one of my uncles kept chickens - yes, in a residential area of London - just after WWII. I don’t think their detritus qualified as fertiliser.
The original Google phone with a keyboard which folded out kinda sideways. I may still have mine in a drawer somewhere. I feel so ... far away.
Since when we have got used to phones which are virtually indestructible with normal everyday use such as keeping them in the back pocket while seated, tossing them carelessly onto the desk etc.
Ergo phones with moving bits do not stand a chance, although I shall be intrigued to find out whether Huawei have cracked it (so to speak).
Case in point : a certain WH lawyer on camera stating "I have no direct knowledge.." of a certain defalcation by an earlier POTUS. Which just means - "DIRECT knowledge", note - he was not standing in the corridor observing Party A giving Party B a BJ. But he knew. Everybody did.
Guess sports field technology has advanced in 50 years so we should never see a water-logged pitch for Important Games.
Different when Leeds lost an FA Cup final. The ground staff spent all morning working sand into a wet pitch as a result of which it was like playing on soft moss. As a result also they lost when the ball, expected as per normal physics to bounce straight into the arms of Gary Sprake, who was positioned exactly right and ready, just went plop and almost dribbled underneath him into the goal.
Yup pre-testing testing. Easy and effective.*
Engineering mate of mine used to help build or buy fancy business-orientated consumer devices (e.g. one of the earliest standalone internet radios) for his boss’s far-flung corporate empire. He’d get a handful of them and fling one at his secretary, one at the boss’s grandma, the cook etc. etc. with the request that they play with it and rate it as Crap or Cloud 9 on a scale of 1 to 10 and why. Only when the first samples passed this test would he even bother moving to the next step.
*Also free, and nobody got fired if the consensus was “crap”.
We do not realise it today but the Communist takeover in Russia 100 some years ago was as welcome to most other countries as was the rise of Isis in the Middle East a couple of years ago. The reaction to “wipe them out” was fairly universal, tempered only by the military realities of the times. Russia has indeed an inescapable sense of being under threat. The West is not doing much to reassure them but I agree with above poster that it would be mad for NATO to become the outright aggressor.
1) Low margin item - and I do not mean cheap : low margin in proportion to the resources needed and likely sales, which leads to >
AND 2) it could have made perfect sense (and I do not believe they could not have solved the engineering issues) if Apple were brave enough to eliminate all ports from a future generation phone, lightning, USB-C, everything (which would have been interesting). But if there is always going to be a physical port of some kind why spend valuable resources on a fancy dongle (which others are doing nicely at, thank you).
Finally, like many here I have cupboards full of plugs, adapters, chargers and cables going all the way back to the first iPod, as well as many other devices. WTF am I supposed to do with that bloody lot (alongside the crates full of other cables and ... I’m gonna stop here to protect my blood pressure).
Thanks El Reg and KMcC. With a name like that there’s a chance you may even have relatives in NZ however remote. None of them would have been in those mosques but that’s not the point. NZ is such a decent welcoming orderly and assimilated place that, and this is going to appear a little trite, today we are all Kiwis.
Many thanks for the above AC and EI.
So are you saying that for example with the way commercial aeronautics are going :
Sully could not have landed on the Hudson? or
The 747 which crashed in Japan some years ago, after the pilot had lost control of the tail, or the tail itself (I forget which), but managed to manoeuvre for some time on engine power alone (an incredible feat), that also could not happen now?
If so - God almighty!
Some years ago a mate of mine, regular visitor to South Africa, said that after a perfect landing in a 747 in Jo'burg the second officer announced gleefully and with much respect and admiration for his boss that it was the final landing by the captain, due to retire after a long commercial flying career, and done entirely manually i.e. without the electronic whiz-bangs.
Question from a non-pilot : Don't they train pilots to fly in an emergency without the technology these days?
The original Spiderman from many years ago, when climbing up the sides of buildings on the end of a rope, wanted blokes on the other end of the rope, not machines.
The main way I can think of to rationalise this is there is only one potential point of failure. And one which has a brain.
I vote for a bloke with a red flag leading the vehicle on foot.
AND can we address the real problem* by reserving a particularly nasty part of the prison system for those select few (but too many) drivers of 'leccy vehicles who think they are doing the world a favour and believe they are entitled to drive like twats!
* I accept though what people say above about pedestrians charging unthinkingly into traffic. Seen it twice. Both times youngish girls somewhat pre-occupied. The first one, the bus (!) driver reacted instantly and she was left with a badly bruised shoulder. Damn lucky. Just imagine if he had been checking the mirror at that instant.
The second walked through a (pedestrian) red light and was left unconscious on the ground by a motor bike. Not his fault at all and he was not going particularly fast - he stopped barely yards away - but he would have had a nasty time of it from the local fuzz. Regardless of what happened to the poor girl none of us wants that.
Forgot to check whether this is Bootnotes, but anyway :
Carpet tiles! Corners rucked up by clumsy cleaners. Fraying. Stretching, shrinking and moving. Ugh!
Now - Lino! (That is short for linoleum, youngsters).
Lasts many decades if properly cared for.
Then in the late '60's early '70's some new-fangled rubber or vinyl (anyway something beginning with "poly" I suppose) came along and every newly-decorated office in the land stank like a plastic bag caught on the exhaust pipe.
We have all reached the tipping point, more often than we would like, when, not naturally being aggressively judgemental, we eventually realise somebody we have known for a while is a pathological liar. Or at least has a poor average when it comes to honesty.
After that you cannot believe a single thing (s)he says. Ever again.
In the business world it applies to individuals as well as corporations - a strange, anthropomorphic phenomenon, but I digress.
I could be referring to any number of public figures but ......