Re: peaceful use of space
I was going to comment on this, too. Always keep in mind, there is not a government on earth that won't make violent actions "for the sake of peace".
It's what government does, after all.
202 publicly visible posts • joined 4 Oct 2010
You must be LEO affiliated to think that it should be in any way acceptable for law enforcement to break the law. If what you suggest is true, then why isn't there a statutory exemption in place in this regard? Citizen right mean precious little already, you think we should just stop pretending they exist at all?
Does anyone else feel like the "used on 432 phones and 1024 officers downloaded the app" and it also says 1015 staff downloaded and used the app? So that would mean that it was used by 2471 phones/devices? All of them, recording everything?
Why is the person who deployed this not responsible directly? It was an accident? That they didn't do their job properly and know the software they were deploying to thousands of staff? Whoever selected this program and no doubt RAMMED it through needs their own ramming.
I'd say the death knell was when tupperware stopped with the classic design and moved into a bunch of thinner, cheaper, worse and more disposable containers. The original ones were skookum, fit for purpose and didn't shatter if you dropped it full of sugar or whatever. Lids made a nice snap and didn't have the modern tendency to wear overly hard on the sealing edge. Modern plastic containers are shamefully lacking in comparison.
I still use an original tupperware strainer (the yellow ones)
I'm calling bollocks here. I work on cars every day for my living. Wiring harness in a typical car is more like maybe 20-30kg at most. Normal couple relay boxes included. My colleague Dave sells VW harnesses all the time because they're shite. It will all fit in a medium cardboard box and is easily carried by 1 person. Most scrap yards don't bother dismantling them except the engine harness (maybe 5-10kg) - and only because they've removed the engine as it's crushed for aluminum. Your 100kg figure, only if you add all the bollocks computers and distribution boxen in modern cars (say a fully loaded caravan). Including a set of video screens and blu-ray players and more bollocks like the "distribution boxes" under the fricking seats, you say all the switches but you must be including the blower fans and actuator motors and all kinds of things to get 220lbs of stuff. All mostly plastic, which will never go away. You really think EVERY DOOR needs it's own separate computer? Several if it has "power" doors. Tailgate has 2 or 3 if it's "power" operated.
Even with a computer for every door, they still put all the wires to the window switch same as in 1980 you know? All the way to the driver's door from all the other doors with electric windows. Even though, yes, the signals all end up going through the computers. To avoid this wiring I see many newer cars put the window switches in the middle of the car so there is only 1 bank. But now the dealer can shake down the body shop when it's time to replace your door after a bang-up. And I don't really SEE the weight savings you were suggesting.
This is a totally false economy - you'll still need however many amps at the back "distribution box" (think those are free?) so the feed wire will just be a big gauge. All these "smart" distribution relay boxes are insanely expensive, by the way, and have ridiculous failure rates. I bet the 19-23 generation of cars will be super extra dodgy with fake components everywhere.
What is needed is to stop putting a whole load of inappropriate tat in cars.
Does anyone else get the feeling like Boeing are playing regulatory catch-up after getting caught with no pants on with the shenanigans they've been pulling last decade or so? Like just shooting from the hip this whole time and now they're like oh fuck, documentation? Standards? They're going to check for that? Uhh.. yeah, we have that.. Hold on a sec!
For so long we've been conditioned to think that only big massive companies can make stuff like aerospace successfully, but the last 20 years says strongly that they can't really do it. There's certainly no reasonable excuse to trust them to "self-certify" any more than you'd trust the guy at the street corner with a spray bottle and squeegee to "self-certify". The big company has so much to lose, yet they have nothing to lose by lying and cheating, because there's so much room to play it off. Worst case scenario they have a relative pittance of a fine - that will just get tacked on to a "cost plus" contract. Maybe they even have to set up some poor sap as a fall guy, but chances are they won't even need to go that far!
A signature is NOT a biometric marker and handwriting analysis is not admissible as evidence because it's hokum.
In the first place, biometric means it's data based on measurements or analysis of the subject's body, and NOT their writing style (a learned behavior). Biometric data can be retrieved from a corpse or an uncooperative "subject" but try getting a signature from a dead guy!
and the fine should extend to the company officers personally as well as anyone involved in negotiating the deal in the first place. It needs to stop being okay to build corporations with the specific intent to break existing laws or circumvent regulations using flimsy arguments.
Not an EV problem, but ENTIRELY a planning and preparedness problem. It barely even gets cold there, what are you whining about? Plus, the typical altitude of Wyoming is over a mile above sea level making the cold more tolerable than it would be at or near sea level.
Did you know that european semi trucks often have more powerful engines than north american models? They're not narrower either, so what do you mean by "bigger semi rigs" ? You think they don't have B trains in EU?
If it's REALLY cold, then it doesn't matter if you have a combustion engine, because the exhaust moisture will condense and freeze in the exhaust system, plug up the exhaust and stall the engine. Been there, done that.
What you really want are plenty of waterproof matches, and some tea candles. When it's -46C and the wind is 110+KPH then you will feel the cold.
It not being considered at the outset is simply no less than malpractice and negligence. If your business is the storage of important and valuable things, it's not a question of whether or not someone will come to get some of it, but rather how frequently attempts will be made.
Just more "take an obvious outcome and pretend you didn't see it coming because it's to do with the INTERNET so it's totally different than before".
Cars WERE generally up to that level. However, now we have "CVT"s and "dual clutch gearboxes" and "high pressure turbos on tiny blocks". Headlamp assemblies that are over $2000 are not unusual. How long will an "active electronic engine mount" last compared to a rubber bush? Does it matter if a starter is only $200, if you have to have the whole drivetrain out to change it? ($2000 labor)
Automakers are actually quite decent at making them reliable - the new trick is fitting the reliability ONLY within the realm of warranty while making it as difficult and uneconomical to service as possible.
It's not harsh. it's the opposite. amazon originally (and quite blatantly) walked all over the labor relations laws. It's not like they invented some new ways of doing so - it's all old hat stuff here. Executives SHOULD ALREADY be serving jail time for conspiring to break federal labor laws. Why do we constantly see the courts serving up these "court ordered" "reminders" that they aren't to be breaking the law again - usually for a period of time.
But how much money did they make doing these things? I bet that $100 mill is just a license fee in comparison.
Yeah according to wiki annual revenue in 2020 was like $1.25 billion. They were doing this to all and sundry customers so there is simply no way $100 million covers the refunds. What about punitive damages? They were in the wrong. Why does the FTC think it is okay to license corporate wrongdoing?