Go boffins!
Don't you just love serendipity?
(excuse me while I go and take my penicillin)
3782 publicly visible posts • joined 1 Oct 2010
But having said that, traveline-cymru.info seems to include all the public transport timetables already. It works out your journey and even includes the 2 minutes to walk from the bus stop to the train station. It also includes google maps, train fares, option to buy ticket etc.
I think they should sue Google!
"But [NSA whistleblower Edward] Snowden has made it more difficult for law enforcement to hunt down the wolves"
Or rather, law enforcement has made it more difficult for law enforcement. If they had limited their work to recording the activities of known or suspected criminals (with a court order) instead of a blanket dragnet recording the minutest activity of millions of law-abiding people around the world, then perhaps there would be less of a rush to keep private activities private.
They have only themselves to blame.
Passwords have issues, but what do we replace them with? Most of the options seem to rely on having unique ID that identifies you as an individual, not as 'someone authorised to access this account'. And I don't want that. And when you have a unique ID used across sites (who in their right mind uses a Facebook ID to sign in to other site?) then when it gets cracked it gets cracked big-time.
Even without serious hacking (and I think aol has been hit recently - I'm getting a spate of malware links from hacked aol contact lists lately) - there is always the problem of shoulder surfing or man-in-the-middle at insecure internet cafes.
I must admit that google 2-factor seems pretty effective though...
One of the joys of Lego in the early days was that it encouraged imagination. Using basic building blocks you could create anything. Then they started bringing out special pieces and sets and it became just another one-use toy, or at best a jigsaw - build whatever is on the box. These figures are the same - kids don't really need a Lord Vampyre figure - if they want to pretend they're fighting the dark lord from their spaceship then they should be able to take a nice friendly smiling 'Mr Bun the Baker' (or whatever) figure and PRETEND he's a mega-vampyre.
All these specialist bits are just a way to extract more money out of kids and their parents.
Obviously Playmobil doesn't count...
The key word is 'long term' - if I or my pension fund is investing to give me a return of several percent p.a. for the next decade, then 0.5% at the beginning really should be pretty invisible (or 0.2% or whatever, just not 0.005%) - and if it's going to hurt 'the market' that much then allow investors to claim it against tax when they sell after 5 years
It wouldn't actually seriously raise the cost of investment to companies - it's the investor who is paying. And I would think many companies would welcome a bit of long term stability in their investor portfolio. Even if they do somehow end up picking up the tab, then if a 0.5% extra at the outset is all that stands between them and ruin then they're already a pretty bad bet for investment.
It's simple - to allow companies to raise the money to expand their business, for the benefit of all concerned, and for investors to invest their money in worthwhile businesses, to generate long-term returns. Anything else, such as the casino of HFT is generally against the principles of the stock market. Businesses should be able to have investors who want long term stable growth for the company, and who take an interest in the work of the company, not investors who know no more about the business than the stock exchange ticker name.
Two simple solutions, which wouldn't harm businesses and long-term investors, but would largely kill off the parasites:
1) The transaction tax - 0.5% should be invisible to a long-term investor
2) Returning to the use of papaer share certificates and share registers - no-one is the legal owner of stock until they hold the paper certificate and it is registered with the company; no-one can sell stock unless they are in physical possession of the certificates.
Virgin? What have they got to do with rural broadband? Look at a map of their coverage -
http://maps.thinkbroadband.com/?utm_source=mainsite&utm_medium=banner&utm_campaign=maps&utm_content=header#!lat=54.43621959127021&lng=-2.74108774609374&zoom=6&type=terrain&cable-coverage
It's hilarious. The day that I see Virgin laying fibre along the country lanes of East Anglia, Yorkshire, Cornwall and Ceredigion, is the day I might take them seriously. They're only interested in cheap and cheerful high-density housing.
In terms of rural services, there really is no competition and there probably shouldn't be. What's the sense of five companies laying pipes/cable/fibre whatever into a rural area with a population of a few hundred? Better to have a monopoly with controls to ensure they a) provide a fair service and b) don't rip off the customers.
If I had a product that was still in development and Zuck offered me $2 BEEEEELLION for it, I think I might say yes. And if it was Beelzebub offering the dosh I'd settle for $1billion.
I really can't blame them. This is like winning the lottery twice weekly for the next couple of years!
Very sensible.
Metric is easy to do calculations in.
Imperial tends to correspond well to the size of everyday natural objects.
So metric feet, metric ton, metric pound, metric pole, metric firkin, metric mile all seem to be a sensible and practical compromise.
I remember being in a French market and people were asking for a livre of whatevers, and they've been metric for a couple of centuries.
Excellent idea, and some good lateral thinking, but this whole appropriate/alternative technology often works best when it can be fixed by a village blacksmith/odd-job-man - how common are African odd-job-men who can hadle fibre optics?
And one question - I assume the wee is filtered out into a tank for direct use on the fields, otherwise it'll take a lot of sunlight to boil it all dry.
There are times when a system is so badly screwed up that you have to give up trying to patch it and just have to shut it down and design something new that works.
The USian 'security' services seem to have reached that point. The NSA, CIA etc are so totally corrupt and broken that they need to be immediately wound up and a new, properly controlled and appropriate security service built up from scratch, with no staff transferred from the old ones (who can be shipped to Gitmo for a few years). Yes it will hurt in the short term, but it's the only long term solution.