Criminal Assets?
So what happens to the £4.8 billion? Does the UK government keep it? Cash it in and give it to Water Company shareholders?
3814 publicly visible posts • joined 1 Oct 2010
"There are also questions about whether vehicles such as Ajax are vulnerable to drone attacks, of the kind seen against tanks in Ukraine's battles against Russia's invasion. "
Nah, I don't think there are any questions. We know.that drones can destroy T-90M Russian tanks. An AFV will be a doddle. They could glue some metal spikes on it?
Before I get worked up about this and boycott Iceland (again - the owner was a prominent Tory donor, also very anti-Welsh, despite being based in Cymru) could we please have some numbers?
How many violent assaults against staff happen in Iceland stores every week? What is this as a percentage of customer visits? How does it compare to e.g. assaults on staff in Lidl or W H Smiths (R.I.P)
Yes, even one violent assault is too many, but could the money for this system be better spent in other ways? Is it just an excuse to reduce the number of actual human security staff, i.e. a cost-cutting measure.
We need to know.
As always the US military and government are re-fighting the last war-but-one.
You want to drop a big bomb somewhere in the vague area of 1100 miles from your airfield? Buy a dozen F35A for $100 million each
Option B - design and build precision long-distance drones that drop 500kg of explosive 1m from your target. Or better, buy Ukrainian ones which have been tested in combat conditions. Cost? Much less than $100 million.
"Well, unless you cancel your licence and give up watching live TV" (NB also iPlayer)
Did that several years ago. Return the threats addressed to "the Legal Occupier" as "Not known at this address". At the rate they're going the postage costs will bankrupt the Licence people.
"It uses Azure AI to decode the data stored in glass, saying it makes reading and writing faster"
So will be unreadable in 20 years then.
Remember the Domesday project back in 1986? Data stored on optical discs. Probably still there, but no machines left that can read them.
Serious long term storage requires a simple format which can be easily reverse engineered by aliens from the future. TIFF images, simple UTF32 text. On a medium that can be read with an optical microscope. Even better, engrave it on slabs on granite.
For various reasons, I've recently been doing some work to harden security on a number of pretty non-critical websites that were originally developed 10-20 years ago. They still work fine, they don't hold any sensitive data, but the hackers have got really sneaky over the years. I've been genuinely shocked to see the sort of devious things they're attempting, even before you get to social engineering.
I suspect those in power really have no idea of what this implies. Some hefty investment, obvs, but a change in thinking. Security is not just about blocking attacks, it's about accepting that successful attacks WILL happen at some stage, and building systems to minimise the impact. Does this mean a rethink of the entire network architecture? Probably. Is there money to pay for that - not just in the NHS? I think not.
Massive cash injection into the NHS to pay for increased IT security!
What do you mean...? Nope?
Oh, of course, they're putting all the extra cash into paying for more staff. No?
What do you mean, "all the cash is going in profits for private health providers who make donations to Labour ministers"?
Windows is a sad fact of life for most people.
But I really hate the restrictions on Win 11 upgrade - TPM makes sense, and realistically recommending 1GHz and 2 cores, fine. You want a slow pc, it's your choice. I have an 8-year old laptop, upgraded to 32GB, and has a 2.3GHz 4-core processor, TPM etc. But can't move to Win 11 because it's the wrong sort of i5 CPU. Can't change it because it's soldered in. <swearword> ridiculous.
I have my doubts about some of the workarounds - hacking registry etc.
I think we call their bluff. Stay on Win 10, with lots of layers of security and anti-nasties. See whether suddenly M$ go back to issuing security patches for 10 when the fallout from 'millions of people having their MS Windows computer hacked' headlines start appearing. "17 die when NHS hospital Windows network hacked" - even if they relax the Win 11 conditions there's a lot of people won't want to/bother to/know how to upgrade.
And Win 12 with AI? <rofl>
Or, what will probably happen in practice, there will be a period when devices have two charging systems. The mandatory USB-C (which will cost about 5 cents to fit) and the new, better, system which will take over over time, and eventually they can stop installing the built-in CD-ROM drive. Oops, sorry, the built-in USB-C port.
But the UK standard must have some differences to the EU one, because, you know, Brexit. So there must be consultation to work out which difference can be most expensive and irritating to prove UK superiority and show that Brexit is working.
I hoped I'd get less cynical with a change of government. Sadly we don't seem to have had one since 2010.
There's always a but.
I've recently bought a couple of devices that are waterproof, and they both use (different) magnetic USB charging cables so the water doesn't get in. Can you get a waterproof bog-standard USB-C socket?
But life has got easier with USB-C being ubiquitous. Although they can be weird still. I got a phone with a 66W charger (it's great for a rapid charge) but the charger uses a USB-C socket for output, so I need a cable with USB-C at borh ends.
Time to have a clear-out of all the spare chargers and foot-long cables.
Given the predilection for UK governments to want to see everyone's data, combined with ignorance* and the resulting tendency to pass impossible legislation to allow that, I have no plans to store any of my data on servers subject to UK law anytime soon. EU is so much safer.
* PPE at Oxford is not a good training for understanding anything technical.**
** Well, understanding anything at all, to be honest.
"Microsoft is already spending close to $19 billion a quarter on AI/ML infrastructure"
How? How on earth do you spend that much on a single research development project? For that money you can employ 100,000 'software engineers' duplicating each others' work and give them each a Cray as a desktop PC.
That was the first thing I thought too. Working with helium seems to be very tricky, and it also seems a shame to vent it off into space when it's so scarce.
I'm sure the rocket boffins have thought it all through, but why helium and not some other inert-ish gas. Nitrogen?
I always find the most satisfying answer is to let them get started then say "Hang on, there's someone at the door - I think it's the parcel I'm expecting. Back in a sec" then just leave them hanging until they give up (often 4-5 minutes)
A variation if they ask for to speak to Mr Penygors is to say "He's just seeing a client out, he'll be with you in a moment" - same result
I believe that this sort of thing is a very socially aware and kind thing to do, as it prevents someone else being irritated by them for a whole 5 minutes. And those minutes of positive karma add up. And more satisfying than asking them if their mother knows they work in organised crime.
This could be useful for Archives. It's not unknown for people to deposit granddad's "papers" with a local Record Office, said papers often containing a load of old floppies or even, gulp, 3" Amstrad disks. How to retrieve the content? Getting a working Amstrad PCW may be possible, but how to link it to more modern machines to transfer the data? Both of these solutions could be quite helpful.
Full fathom five thy father lies;
Of his bones are coral made;
Those are pearls that were his eyes:
Nothing of him that doth fade,
But doth suffer a sea-change
Into something rich and strange.
Sea-nymphs hourly ring his knell:
Ding-dong.
Hark! now I hear them,—ding-dong, bell.