Re: A great example
Interetsing.
GNU was working on the Hurd kernel. How far did they get?
Linus used GNU toolchain and libs and gave GNU a working kernel.
And last I checked, Linus did not make the kernel proprietary - it's always been free to download/use/modify without cost. The only difference was switching from his own personal license to the easier-to-enforce GPL (mainly because of the foundation that keeps the GPL valid).
As for "corporate-approved tone" - did you have a specific one in mind? Like Slackware or Debian?
Your earlier post:
"Him originally releasing Linux as proprietary software was not deserving of thanks (as a developer that releases proprietary software deserve punishment for releasing a harmful program, not thanks) - he only deserves thanks for re-licensing it to a free license.
If you read my post, you'll realize that I did thank him for all his code reviews (what overseeing development and maintenance is).
So no-one can make other suggestions huh?"
Can you defend your position on "releasing Linux as proprietary software ..."?
Again, Linus did not make the kernel proprietary at any time. Talk about someone talking out of both sides ...