Re: Luckily the department was gutted...
Crossing state borders would be an issue for somewhere such as Minneapolis/St Paul [...]
Um, that's a county border, not a state border.
690 publicly visible posts • joined 22 Sep 2010
Jared Isaacman, stated: "NASA should be willing to move quickly and take smart risks when the potential return is worth it, and that is exactly what we did with this mission. This is not the outcome we were working toward, but it does not change why this mission was worth attempting."
Indeed.
Just because you won the pot, it doesn't mean you played the hand correctly.
And losing the pot doesn't necessarily mean you played the hand incorrectly.
Nope damp squibs is correct. Damp squids is an "eggcorn"
It's a joke, I say a joke son! You're built too low, the fast ones go right over your head!
The "damp squid" comment was a reference to "The IT Crowd" TV show. I thought this was the one place where people would get it. I guess it was a swing and a miss.
[The "It's a joke son" line I stole from Foghorn Leghorn (who stole it from senator Claghorn)]
It's cute that people think that's a bug instead of a tactic.
Not that I'd call Outlook on Windows anything close to acceptable. But plenty of Corporate IT people seem to think it's good enough, and that's all that really counts.
Though I recently installed vscode on Linux and I am still completely shocked and amazed at how much it doesn't suck. Whoever is in charge of enshittification at MS must really be slipping to let vscode escape.
Seems to me that by pulling the plug on the only serious current competitor to SpaceX that now just ties the US space program to a single vendor.
The problem is that Starliner is not a serious competitor. It's not even close to being a competitor at all.
The US is tied to a single vendor and will be for the foreseeable future. That's just a hard, cold fact.
Pretending that's not the case and pissing more money down the Starliner rathole will provide no return at all (unless you're a Representative or Senator who can take credit for what are effectively high-tech welfare checks being sent to constituents).
If you want a legitimate second vendor, it would be better IMO to spend the money with Blue Origin.
I'm pretty sure that dir was snaffled from CP/M, which got it from TOPS-10, predating Unix.
The story I heard was that Gary Kildall based a lot of that stuff on RSX11-M and the DCL shell — but that's a distinction without a difference due to the way things were shared between RSTS, RSX11, TOPS, VAX/VMS, etc.
Not 100% true, in fact in most cases it was the complete opposite. They were religious fanatics who wanted to persecute everybody who didn't follow their extreme versions of Christianity and they were prevented from doing that.
Indeed. As one history teacher I once heard say: "The Pilgrims left Holland to escape religious freedom." What they wanted was a society with a complete lack of religious freedom — with their narrowly defined religion as the only one allowed.
I've been spared more than a couple times because I just don't build modules I don't need.
It always seemed like a bad idea to have a thousand unneeded kernel modules sitting around waiting to be demand-loaded by next week's exploit program.
You can achieve something similar by disabling/blacklisting modules you do not need.
My Linux kernel is configured without modules. Every driver needed to run my machine is compiled in.
It doesn't matter if you use run-time-loadable modules or if you compile everything into a static kernel.
What matters is disabling stuff you don't need.
I run custom compiled Linux kernels on my Gentoo systems, and this isn't the first time my machines were immune to a CVE because it exploits flaws in modules that aren't available. Meanwhile, the Ubuntu systems I manage are vulnerable — even though those systems have no need for the vulnerable modules either.
Somehow it never seemed like a good idea to have a thousand kernel modules I have absolutely no need for available for loading on demand by next week's exploit application...
Likewise - only replace them before the end of security updates if they develop a fault or get broken!
Yep, and I'll even fix some faults/breakages. My Pixel 6a is currently on its 2nd screen and 2nd battery. I did the screen replacement myself, and Google paid for the battery replacement as part of a recall. Hopefully it will last another year (or more if Google extends support). Many newer Android models are getting updates for 7 years, so that'll be the the goal for the next phone...
I sort of miss the monochome LCD screens that were easily read in bright light.
Though I do remember one of my old flip phone's screen was oriented the "wrong" way. When wearing polarized sunglasses, the phone's screen was solid black unless you held it sideways.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sphere_of_influence_(astrodynamics)
Mia Culpa, I stand corrected. "Sphere of lunar influence" is the proper phrase in that context. My apologies to Mr. Speed.
[That's still no excuse for saying things like "they've left the Earth's gravity behind" on a NASA broadcast. If that were the case, then it wouldn't be a free-return trajectory.]
Artemis II is due to exit the sphere of lunar influence on Tuesday.
<rant>
Interesting. Newton was wrong then?
F ≠ G m₁m₂/r²
At some value of r, F suddenly drops to zero at the boundary of the "sphere of lunar influence"?
What exactly is the radius of the sphere of lunar influence?
As anybody who lives near an ocean can witness first-hand, the "sphere of lunar influence" definitely includes the Earth.
So how exactly is Artemis going to "exit" that sphere?
At one point, some half-witted commentator on the Nasa Youtube broadcast was yakking inanely about how the spacecraft had left Earth's gravity and was now under Lunar gravity (or something very close to that). Nobody who works for NASA should be saying stupid things like that in public.
If you mean that the gravitational field of the Moon is now stronger than the gravitational field of Earth (or vice versa), THEN SAY THAT!
</rant>
At some point, things have to improve.
Do they? Really??
Microsoft has been shitting on their customers for decades and they just keep putting up with it.
What motivation does Microsoft have to put any expense into improving things when Corporate IT departments have drunk so much cool-aid they'll put up with any amount of abuse from Microsoft and just smile and ask for more.
> Putting inmates to work is not slavery,
Yes, it is. That's why the 13th Amendment to the US Constitution specifically exempts it from the prohibition against slavery:
Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
It's just not illegal slavery.
Somebody needs to tweak the AI prompt that's being sued to generate article headlines like this one:
Operating Lightning takes down SocksEscort proxy network...
Yes, I'm sure that operating lightning can take down a network, but that's not really what the article is about. :)
"Meusel ran a constant-time implementation through GCC 15.2 (with -std=c++23 -O3"
The -O3 is telling the compiler to to optimization and then he is complaining about it doing optimizations?
Exactly. He told the compiler explicitly to do whatever it can to make the code run faster, and then bitches about the code running faster.
I've recently discovered a dangerous flaw in the design of my car! When I take my foot of that pedal and press it on that other pedal the car suddenly STOPS!! This could happen right in the middle of the freeway!!! People could be killed!!!! Something must be done — Think Of The Children!!!!!
That said, even when you "turn off" optimization with -O0, the C standard still allows the compiler to do anything it wants that still produces "correct behavior". The definition of "correct behavior" does NOT (and never has) included constant (or even predictable or consistent) execution times.
Controlled demolitions use explosives to cut through the center supports of a structure so that the structure collapses inward.
Right. It's gravitationally powered collapse in a (hopefully) predictable manner. Nothing is imploding. Imploding means that there's large pressure differential with high pressure outside and low pressure inside.
OceanGate's Titan submersible imploded.
Buildings being demolished just collapse when you cut their structural supports.
IMO, Microsoft peaked with version 4.0 of the their DOS C compiler/debugger back in 1986. That was a fine product, with good documentation. The OS it ran on was crap.
The first couple generations of wired optical mice (with wheels) from the mid 90's were also fine products.
Pretty much everything else from MS has been varying levels of awful with an overall downward trend over the decades.
Customers who must have calendar and shared address book support still have other options, including existing Thunderbird Exchange add-ons such as ExQuilla and Beonex's Owl.
Good on you for mentioning Beonix's Owl for Exchange. I've been using it with TB for a few years now, and it is fantastic. Not only does the e-mail support work flawlessly, the calendar and contact support also "just works". For Exchange servers that don't have EWS enabled, Owl also works with OWA. Support from Beonex has been first-class.
Regarding https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/argonforty/upton-one-the-true-raspberry-pi-compute-module-5-laptop/
* Screen is too small.
* No Ethernet (AFAICT)
* Bad keyboard layout: my fingers only work with inverted T arrow keys (they seem to be too old to change).
I've wanted an ARM laptop for many years, but it would have to run Linux. I've no interest in running Windows on it. I've looked at various options including "laptop" case/kits for Raspberry PI boards and some other options, but nothing has ever seemed all that practical or cost effective compared to my trusty old Thinkpad T series models. The closest thing I can find would probably a high-end Chromebook, but they're all a bit small/cramped and lack essentials like an RJ45 Ethernet jack.
Scammers are posing as lawyers and offering to recover funds stolen from victims of cryptocurrency scams.
You've got to admit that those particular scammers sure know how to pick a chump. From the self-select group of crypto "investors" you then skim off the cream by targeting those who've already been scammed.
I am sure that the developers of Asmi are quaking in their boots about your refusal to consider it. [...] Asmi will succeed if it can find, and be known to, a target audience. I wish them luck
I'm sure both statements are true, but I don't see how they have anything to do with the question I asked. I wasn't attempting to threaten the Asmi devs with failure, ignomy, or a rain of frogs. I simply wanted to know if Asmi 13 required systemd. I looked at the Asmi 13 web site, and couldn't tell. My rather vague understanding is that you have to use the Devuan fork instead of "plain" Debian if you want to use another init system, so my guess is that Asmi can only use systemd.
[Sheesh. Ask a simple yes/no question and people act like you're kicking their puppy.]
Americans do not call that a "trailer". It's an RV, van, or bus (depending on size and internal furnishing and purpose).
A trailer is non-powered and is pulled by another vehicle. Usually with some of the towed weight supported by the tongue/hitch. If no weight is supported by the tongue, it's often called a "wagon" instead of a "trialer". At least here in the mid-west USA...