Posts by Tempest8008 111 posts • joined 30 Aug 2010
IANA should be able to obtain access to a COVID-19 test.
Before they isolate themselves, have the participants tested and confirmed virus free, THEN lock them in together.
People living in the same household aren't held to the social distancing requirements...that'd be daft. Being locked in together for a few days would hold the same strictures, I assume. And if they've been tested and confirmed virus free the point should be moot, regardless.
As mentioned previously, the headline definitely makes it seem like "another" SpaceX failure.
The headline would have been more accurate if it had been: Dragon Docker Down: No SpaceX Today
The Register really seems to have it in for SpaceX. The headlines and stories are rarely complimentary.
My company is developing some Hololens apps.
I can say with definite authority that we would NOT want our software on the regular Microsoft Store; our apps won't be for the general public.
If the only way they're going to allow people to download and install apps on the Hololens is via some kind of authorized "Store" setup, we're going to need our own to deliver our product, so that part at least makes sense.
Of course, now we need to think about Hololens 2. I hope the codebase isn't too different between models...
The Dragon Capsule has proven itself in cargo delivery to the ISS repeatedly. It also separates, makes its way down through the atmosphere and splashes down intact when sent back with experiment results/trash. So that part works. The one launch failure in-flight, the Dragon capsule survived but due to a software oversight didn't pop its parachutes. This oversight has been fixed.
The Space-X boosters work to get the Dragon Capsule into orbit. One failure on the pad, one in flight out of 68 launches so far.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Falcon_9_and_Falcon_Heavy_launches#Launch_outcomes
That failure on the pad was during a static fire test, and changes to that procedure means the payloads are no longer going to be on-board during those kinds of tests...so no astronaut danger there.
I understand 100% that NASA wants to make things as safe as possible. I think SpaceX and Boeing and all of the private firms reaching for space feel the same way and are working flat out to achieve the most safety they can.
But at some point you have to decide you've done all you can and light the touch paper.
Yeah, refusing to call it Starship. But a single SpaceX BFR would be able to loft the equivalent of 5.2 of those suckers at once.
We need big lifters and a bloody origami expert to fit it all into a neat unfold-able package.
Er....we also need the BFR to exist.
You! Yes, you! Get on that...
So you can move your eyes outwards simultaneously instead of inwards?
That's cool. But now I'm struggling to find a name for that...can't be cross-eyed, you're not crossing them.
Google is your friend (says Google):
Wall-eyed
or
Exotropia
or
Divergent Strabismus (if you're a cat)
No wonder International Law is ignored when it's this damn fuzzy.
They say, "Access to information is a human right..."
WHAT?! So every human has a right to every piece of information on the planet?
Since when? I don't even have a "right" to know what my friend ate for breakfast if she doesn't want to tell me, let alone proprietary intellectual property or manufacturing processes.
And by that logic every human should have full access to a device that can access that information, the power to run it, and the education to be able to use it.
Talk about pie-in-the-sky claptrap.
If the people in these countries want to be able to access the Internet unfettered and uncensored then I'm afraid they're going to have to fight for those rights...like everyone else.
No "right" comes free.
COMMENCE THE DOWNVOTES!
Doesn't it make more sense for SpaceX to try a launch with a previously used rocket and have a cheaper, more disposable payload?
A bunch of school cubesats, for example.
They eat the cost of the launch, but now you have PROOF that your PL (previously launched) rockets work, and you can start hauling in multiple requests at the lower price.
You end up with quantity making up the money, and if something DOES go wrong your customer isn't out millions for a destroyed satellite.
And in the meantime they get to look like the good guys, providing a free launch for academia.
(I'm assuming the reason they didn't do this is due to an accountant somewhere)
Too many problems to count. I'm responsible for numerous sites around my Province of Ontario (Canada).
Location 1: Single rack with network gear, a DVR, UPS, and ancillary equipment. The room also houses the demarc and the phone system. By company fiat ONLY IT equipment is to be in this room.
But...
The site has put a drinks cooler in there, propped the door open 24x7, and is now using it to store janitorial supplies and tools.
Location 2: Same as above for the IT gear, plus a small print server.
But...
The site has removed all the venting from the door, resulting in NO air flow, and the night cleaning contractors put their half full mop bucket in there the other night. Hello humidity alarms at 3am...
Location 3: The MDF has a couple of servers, 3 separate network racks, the PA system, the phone system and acts as the demarc for two buildings.
But...
The site has decided to store sales paraphernalia, including sweaters, t-shirts, golf bags, posters, flat packs of floor displays and everything else they can think of in there. That's in addition to all of the PCs that I have recently lifecycled that they are requiring "be stored in a secured area" before I (literally) chuck them in a big wooden crate and the company we contract with comes and takes them away...in 6 months.
There is no longer any such thing as sacrosanct when it comes to IT gear. It used to be considered inviolate, sacred, and feared.
Now it's in the way...until it goes down.
Fun times...
24 hours a day
7 days a week (which includes weekends, which are usually days off)
365 days a year (which includes all the holidays etc, again usually days off)
Generally that's how that is read.
But as you're obviously intelligent, you knew that....you're just being nitpicky.
Nothing wrong with being nitpicky, per se, though sometimes it can come across as just being smarmy.
Engendering replies like mine. Which is a textbook example of being...
Crap. Have I just been trolled?
Dammit...
You said in your email that you had other people in journalism who would be happy to give up a seat for you.
Time to work another angle. Find one of them who IS willing to give you up a seat and get in using their credentials.
Job done.
Or pull some Mission Impossible crap and crash it. Find out who the caterer is and get in that way, or better yet the lighting/multimedia company who is streaming the event (you can guarantee Apple contracted that out) and get in with them under the guise of reviewing their streaming setup.
Go for it!
Since when did news need to be exciting?
But not really my point. Netflix is blocking VPNs...from a technical point of view I'm more interested in the HOW than the WHY.
We know why. You know why, you spelled it out very succinctly.
And not that I do not agree. Someone has to pay for the content and the licensing model (outdated and antiquated as it is) is the method they use to do that.
I'm just curious HOW Netflix is doing it. Are they just collecting VPN hostnames and blacklisting them? If so it just becomes a race where the VPN providers keep rolling over between domain names to keep off the blacklist.
Are they doing something more interestingly technical?
The point being, it's news. It's technical. It's I.T. related, and it's a big player like Netflix that's involved. I would have expected The Register to do a report on it. That's all.
I know the first time was a success, but the second time? That's a pattern...and it was from a booster on a geostationary launch, which is twice as fast as a LEO launch.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0bMeDj76ig
In case anyone wants to see the video.
I just think it's newsworthy...
Don't remind me of Mission Patches.
I have never seen hide nor hair of the LOHAN mission patch I was supposed to receive as part of the competition for the slogan to go on it.
<grumbles>
But I'd prefer them to be spending their energy on actually getting that mission in the air. Sod my bloody patch.
SpaceX has prided itself on being a lean company, with very little of the bloat that affects NASA as a government agency.
You want floating FO lines between the barge and either the support ship or a second barge.
Who is setting that up? Who is testing it? Who is reeling it all in when done?
The resources you would devote to that SpaceX is instead devoting to other areas that have been deemed more important.
That's it. Why bother providing the feed in the first place then? Because the system they DO have is cheap, easy to set up, and doesn't require a dedicated team of people to maintain and fart around with. Why offer it at all then? Because it's cheap, easy to set up, and doesn't require a dedicated team of people to maintain and fart around with.
This is all cost vs. reward. The cost for them in the current system in time, material and labour is minimal. The reward would be a live video of their 1st stage returning successfully in a world first...where they would probably provide an on-site HQ recording at a later time anyway.
In your system the cost is WAY higher across the board. The reward is letting people watch repeated failures as they iron out the bugs and try to figure out an immensely difficult engineering problem, or, on the off chance it works fantastically and people get to see that world first live....they provide a recording in HD the next day taken from the onboard camera system.
You've said yourself they are very good at what they do. Don't you think that they COULD figure out the live feed issue on the barge if they wanted to?
This is a "good enough" system as far as SpaceX is concerned. Otherwise you can be damned sure they WOULD have fixed it long ago.
I want it to be a true, autonomous robot. Not some glorified remote control experiment.
Have the remote control ready and a cutoff in place to be able to take charge if needed, but I'd really like to see it making its own choices and reacting on its own.
A truly, magnificently, barbed, bladed, and bad-ass autonomous death machine.
"Very funny. - Dr. Jones."
"ARRGH! Windows 10! Oh, look! A snake."
"The real reason the complaints about the new Register website went unanswered."
"No. I'm not a viper. No. I'm not a python. I'm a run-of-the-mill, non-venomous, ophidian. I'm sitting here because it's nice and warm. I am not amusing nor do I care to be. Like this laptop I am merely being used to further the advertising goals of The Register. Later on I'll be put back in my terrarium and fed some crickets...perhaps a small mouse or frog. Then I'll sleep for a week. This is my life. Could be worse, I suppose. Like most things, there's less complexity here than you'd expect. And if you're looking for the punchline at the end of this long winded ophidian's monologue, keep waiting. I'm not here to entertain you."
It was #8 birdshot!
The pellets were tiny and when falling would never get to a speed where they could injure someone or damage property. You'd be in more danger of a bird flying over and crapping in your eye.
As a father with kids I would take great exception to someone flying a drone over my house without my permission.
As a father with kids I would take great exception to someone using a gun to shoot down that drone, were I their neighbour.
I make no pronouncements either way in this case. Both parties were in the wrong as far as I'm concerned (and as you pointed out) and I, for one, will be watching to see how the Courts deal with the issue. As others have noted, this will be an interesting test case.
"Excuse me mademoiselle, you appear to be getting a sunburn. You might want to put on some sunscreen or step inside for a while."
Wow. That would have done the same thing!
And it didn't require anyone to wire up their bikini or create an app for it.
Yes. Talking. It works!
I have a Misfit Shine I got (subsidized) through my work.
I wear it on my wrist.
It also acts as a watch.
I'm out of shape and I know it, and like most of you I sit at a desk all day with occasional forays to the vending machine.
I have to say that I'm walking more because of it. Instead of sitting all lunch catching up on the latest TV show I missed I go for a walk instead. The goal is 10,000 steps per day. If I get half of those in before I head home I'm going to hit that target, so I AM walking more. Which is good.
Since the start of May I've dropped 7-8lbs, and while I could have done that on my own, the Shine, I think, has been a motivation. I've been wearing it for a month now, and it's not going anywhere but back on my wrist.
Instead of the spray and pray method of microwaving food why not add the ability to direct the waves? Gimbal the emitters and link the camera so it directs the microwaves where they need to go to heat the food in the desired manner.
The first truly "smart" microwave.
The screen, linking it to my phone...that's just faffing about. Make the device work better and I'm interested.
Nonononono.
There can be no mitigation of the unwatchableness.
No drugs, no alcohol DURING the screenings.
Afterwards, sure.
I only say this because enough alcohol can make even severe limb trauma amusing. You must be wide awake, cogent, and coherent if this is to be a true test.
And may God have mercy on your souls...
The video was nice, but I would like to know the results of all the tests they performed.
Radiation, shielded sufficiently or not?
Did the craft perform within specs?
Any issues that have been discovered that need to be addressed?
Cats, shielded sufficiently or not?
(one can assume so on that last point...otherwise you know one of those little buggers would have curled up right on the camera lens)
Honestly, "modern and fresher"?
AND you're going to have a consultant firm in to give you advice on further changes?
In both of these cases the BOFH would have to have multiple situations where inconvenient falls clear the way for common sense. And there's always the server room halon system...
Add another vote to the "Don't like it" column. I find it harder to read, and you're forcing me to relearn a bloody website.
I found The Register easy to navigate, clean and simple before. It got me to the MEAT of the site, which were the articles. Now I'm having to work harder to get to the information I want.
There's style and then there's simple function.
I'd prefer El Reg to be about the latter.
The Register - Independent news and views for the tech community. Part of Situation Publishing
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2020
