ahhhh, I'm covered in beeeeees!
</izzard>
501 publicly visible posts • joined 4 Jun 2007
My grandpa always used to say "there's lies, damn lies and statistics." He should have added "and then there's the things politicians say."
At the end of the day you can easily twist any statistic to say anything you want, especially when talking to politicians or most of the public who don't understand stats anyway. Factor in an unspecified "change in the way figures are recorded" and all your stats are useless. And, that's the way the government wants it because then they can manufacture any truth they want.
"as of 2012 the government will require people applying for a passport or ID card to submit ten fingerprints for recording in the National ID database"
Ok if I submit 10 fingerprints each taken from a different corpse in my local morgue? It doesn't say they have to be MY fingerprints. ;)
Mostly reported no problems as I expected but I disagree with the results for POP3, SMTP and IMAP.
"Direct TCP connections to remote POP3 servers (port 110) succeed, but do not receive the expected content.
The applet received an empty response instead of our normal banner. This suggests that a firewall, proxy, or filter initially allowed the connection and then terminated it, either because it did not understand our server's reply or decided to block the service. "
The results for SMTP were similar but I regularly use several POP3 + SMTP servers that are not part of my ISP's network.
"Perhaps they also use apps that cannot run on Linux and so can't cobble together a PC for the job? At least when you buy an iMac if you want to go play with your own shit you can dual boot into windows."
What exactly would stop a PC dual booting Linux and Windows? Or running Windows in a VM under Linux? Time to buy yourself an IT for Dummies book, Ubuntu and Win7 live perfectly happily with each other on my quad core box.
Spotify are making a profit? Are you sure about that?
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/05/spotify_exclusive/
"just 14p of advertising revenue per user - not enough to keep the lights on"
If you can't keep the lights on then you aren't making a profit. Their figures may have improved since then but it's a long way from 14p per user to a sustainable profit.
My gf has a similar condition only her bag is internal with a small opening in her side that she catheterises. We will be flying for the first time since she had this op in about 10 days.
Since most doctors haven't heard of her condition or recent operations I'm dreading the reaction of airport security when they see the large quantities of drugs, dressings, catheters wrapped in a plastic bag with a sterilising gel, etc in her hand luggage. She must have some of these items in her hand luggage in case she needs to use them during our time in the airport or on the flight.
What is unbelievably stupid is that they let the man's luggage in which they had planted explosives onto the flight. In no way does it beggar belief that the man himself was allowed onto the flight since he is not a terrorist, smuggler or whatever and in fact is totally innocent. Not that I'd expect a politician to understand that.
I do not want adverts in the middle of whatever I'm doing on my phone, while reading a book or during any part of my daily life if I can help it. I only put up with them on the TV coz I can change channel and see if there's anything less shite on elsewhere. Sadly there usually isn't.
Genes must be using a different Win7 to me because all the copies I've installed have warned me about lack of a-v immediately and I've used 3 different editions. Personally I think Vista's ton of confirmation dialogs that encourage users to just click ok without reading even more than they do already is less secure than a more focused UAC that might cause them to read before they click. But the icing on the cake is Genes saying having a virtual copy of XP in Win7 Home would make it more secure. When everyone else in the industry says the opposite you've got to think he's talking nonsense before you consider the facts and come to the same conclusion.
And what if someone else with the same name lives in that street? A few years ago I had a next door neighbour with the same name. Carphone Warehouse accused me of identity theft when buying a mobile phone despite the fact that I was using my own card and the house numbers on our addresses were different. They disabled the phone and I ended up returning it and buying another elsewhere.
The situation would be a whole lot worse if you were accused of being a sex offender when innocent.
"However it doesn't surprise me that a bunch of geeks with their minds on higher things (ahem) might not have considered something so mundane as power supply redundancy"
Except they did consider it. The article clearly states that diesel generators kicked in and kept the refrigeration circuits running. That's power supply redundancy making sure the important parts are kept running.
As you can see to the left my name is David Murray, I also live very near Rangers stadium so you'd expect me to be one o them. But, I was brought up a catholic and most of my family support Celtic. If you ask me "which team do you support?" I'll say Fiat Yamaha with a big grin on my face. Then when you look totally confused I'll explain I don't pay any attention to football coz it's all shite and I watch MotoGP (among other 2 wheeled motorsports).
Plus everyone knows that question is an attempt at subtle discrimination so you're still open to be sued if you ask it in an interview.
So where would your casual question get you?
"Unless you tell us we're never gonna know... What is anybody gonna think?"
That CTC are a bunch of facists that have forgotten about the presumption of innocence. Which comes as no surprise these days really since the MET and most other UK Police forces seem to follow the same procedures.
"The potentially sensitive data is included in PDFs that have been printed using Internet Explorer."
The explanation in this article is so poor I had to go to the linked site because I couldn't see how printing a pdf could possibly add anything to it. The information is not included in pdfs that have been printed with IE, it is included in web pages that have been converted to pdfs using a pdf printer driver from IE. That's very different to the explanation given in the article.
The number of pdfs that are created by printing a web page will be much lower than the number of pdf that have been printed while viewing them in IE. The poor explanation given will cause a lot more people to think they are at risk of exposing info than actually are. Is this CNet or El Reg?