How about "Not quite as insecure as the last one. Maybe"? A bit of a mouthful I know, but it doesn't overpromise.
Posts by PassiveSmoking
697 publicly visible posts • joined 29 Aug 2010
Google asks the public to name the forthcoming Android N operating system
Politician claims porn tabs a malware experiment, then finds God
Girls outpace boys in US IT and engineering test
'Knucklehead' Kansas bloke shoots self in foot
Blocking ads? Smaller digital publishers are smacked the hardest
Not just overdoing it
It's not just that there are a lot of ads which slow page loading down (which they do)
It's not just that they're a colossal waste of bandwidth (which they are)
It's not just that they are loud and gaudy and ruin the experience (which they do)
It's that legitimate ones do creepy things like tracking you and your browsing habits, and that if an adserver gets compromised then the ads can shovel malware onto your system.
Ads aren't just annoying, they're downright dangerous. If that's not fixed then no argument against ad-blockers will ever hold any water with me. Why should I risk my own safety for the sake of your bottom line?
PLA sysadmin gets six months house arrest for yanking US Army docs
Wasps force two passenger jets into emergency landings
Not the first time
This sounds nearly exactly like Birgenair flight 301.
Sadly things didn't go so well in that case and nearly 200 people died. Good job these pilots were on the ball and able to get the plane back down (might have been a different story had it been night).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birgenair_Flight_301
How to evade the NSA: OpSec guide for journalists also used by terrorists
The Lonely Pirate MEP's Holocaust copyright stunt backfires
I initially wasn't even going to dignify this was a response, but....
Your article stopped short of "Not liking copyright == FASCIST!" by the narrowest of narrow margins, presumably so you could get all self-righteous when somebody called you out on it. Sorry buddy, you don't get to use language like the kind you used in your article and then get all uppity that somebody took exception to it.
Then you utterly dismiss the Steamboat Willy Permanent Copyright complaint, even though it's a perfectly valid complaint. All the people who had creative input on that film is now long dead. How does it benefit anybody other than the Mouse House that the copyright on that film keeps getting extended? As for hundreds of works falling out of copyright every year, I wonder what proportion of those copyrights are individuals versus corporations? I'd wager it's a fairly safe bet that there aren't an awful lot of corporate copyrights being allowed to expire. Hell, it took a protracted court battle to get the copyright on Happy Birthday To You overturned, for crying out loud.
As for Facebook, Twitter, Google, et al abusing the copyrights of individuals, what is it that they have in common with Disney? Could it be that they're big corporations? Just a thought!
Copyright is heavily biased in favour of the wealthy and powerful, those with legal teams who can fight for every concession and lobbying teams who can butter up lawmakers for stacking the deck even more in their favour. Meanwhile I don't get to enjoy any of the benefits that strong copyright is supposed to afford me. I don't get an extension on my holiday snaps or creative writing exercises, if I use a big corporation's IP in one of my own projects I'm subject to being sued into enough debt that my grandkids would be born owing, yet in the reverse situation I'm expected to lube up and take it.
Copyright does not protect individuals. If it did, Facebook, Google, Twitter et al wouldn't be able to abuse it so egregiously. You even admit it yourself that they do it (And I know that because I RTFA). It doesn't even protect creators. It's not creators who are issuing an endless stream of bogus DMCAs on YouTube, it's "IP enforcement companies" that are doing that. Copyright as currently implemented simply allows those with big legal budgets to bolster their bottom line.
Finally you try to paint me as having some sort of "irrational rage" against copyright. That's pretty rich coming from someone who accused me of not RTFA. As I keep saying, I'm all for copyright as long as it's fair and equitable, and does what it was intended to do (protect the works of a creator for a limited period in exchange for the work becoming public domain when the copyright expires). It currently does nothing of the sort.
Ironically I suspect we basically want the same thing, for people who create things to get their dues. But you fetishise copyright so blindly that you won't even engage with somebody who thinks that copyright reform is best served by limiting it and levelling the playing field rather than making it even stronger than it already is. The current system does not work and needs to be heavily reformed.
Lovely little bootnote at the end there. I love the implication "If you don't like copyright then you're a dictator!!"
Authoritarian regimes are bad (this headline brought to you by the Obvious Times), but regimes that play the role of lapdog to big business are no better. As I have repeatedly said (when actually allowed to say anything at all by the mods), copyright is perfectly fine and acceptable if it's fair on all sides.
It currently is not even remotely fair on all sides because it is de facto infinite for any work from Steamboat Willy on. Whenever SBW's copyright term approaches expiration, the rules governing how long copyright lasts get extended. We were promised copyright wouldn't be forever, but in practice it is.
The case for ethical ad-blocking
I block all ads because they're demonstrably dangerous. Ad serving businesses have notoriously lax security and you can find perfectly innocent pages serving up malware through their ads as a result. Even when not explicitly designed to harm you, ads are overly intrusive and attempt to track you against your wishes. They're also obnoxious, especially video ads that auto play with the audio turned up.
I'll consider ditching ad blockers when the advertising industry get their act together. Until then, I'll just block everything (and stop using sites that insist I turn the ad blocker off)
Unisys releases its ClearPath MCP OS for VMs or x86
Docker hired private detectives to pursue woman engineer's rape, death threat trolls
Stuff like this makes me feel sick to my stomach. As the socially awkward kid, as well as the kid with the extremely visible disability I got bullied a lot and when it came time to enter the work force I spent years on the scrap heap because nobody would give me a chance.
I always took solace in the idea that at least groups built of mostly nerdy people were at least accepting of anybody who had enough knowledge or intelligence to fit into the group, regardless of gender, race or disability.
Between incidents like this and the ongoing clusterfuck that is gamergate I'm feeling pretty disillusioned right now.
Boffins believe buggy Binder embiggens Android attack surface
The first rule of client/server systems is always that if your security/validation depends on the client then you have no security/validation. This is real newbie crap right here.
And how many millions of smartphones and other devices around the world now depend on code that's been shown to break such a fundamental rule?
Jaron Lanier: Big Tech is worse than Big Oil
Not really.
The argument the article seems to be making is that copyright is the great liberator, that it makes everybody's lives better, and stronger copyright and stronger enforcement of copyright is in everybody's best interest.
My argument is that copyright, and especially ill-conceived copyright enforcement laws like the DMCA are a blunt instrument that the evil Big Tech use to bludgeon the rest of us into submission. Did you know, for example, that an organisation promoting a FOSS 3D modelling package called the Blender Foundation made an open source movie called Sintel and made not only the movie itself but also all assets involved in making the movie free for non-commercial use to anybody who wanted them? Did you also know that Sony took the movie and used it as a demo for their video equipment (which is fair enough given the rules the movie was released under)? But did you also know that Sony then issued a DMCA against the Blender Foundation, claiming that the BF's distribution of Sintel related materials was in breach of Sony's copyright on Sintel? Even though it was BF who owned the copyright? Said DMCA notice resulted in the (temporary) removal of Sintel from Youtube.
Like I said, copyright needs to be fair. For everybody. It currently isn't, and making it stronger would only make matters worse. First and foremost, the DMCA must die.
Sorry? Copyright will save us from big tech?
I think anybody who had fair use content DMCA's out of existence from YouTube and/or had their channels shut down might have a different opinion on that front.
And your opening sentence sounds like a stretch at best.
Don't get me wrong, I'm all for protecting the rights of creators, but there should be some fairness in the laws and right now there isn't any. I copied the CDs I bought with my money to the iPhone I also bought with my money using the software Apple provided me for that purpose, and under UK copyright law that makes me an evil scumlord pirate. How is that fair. And how is it fair that the goalposts on how long copyright lasts keep moving? Lets be honest, no work made since Steamboat Willy will ever go out of copyright because when the copyright on that film is about to expire the American government will extend copyright terms.
Ten years in the clink, file-sharing monsters! (If UK govt gets its way)
Re: His (her) Master's Voice
Yes, because scope creep never happens in the British legal system, does it? Nobody has ever been persecuted with anti-terrorism laws for putting the wrong wheelie bin out or letting their dogs crap all over a public park, have they? And nobody has ever ended up in prison for making a crap joke on Twitter about blowing up an airport.
Oh, wait...
Adobe scrambles to untangle itself from QuickTime after Apple throws it over a cliff
Larry Ellison's Brit consortium in 'advanced talks' to buy Aston Villa
How innocent people 'of no security interest' are mere keystrokes away in UK's spy databases
US congresscritter's iPhone hacked (with, er, the cell networks' help)
Censorship FTW! China bans Paris Hilton, minor Kardashians et al
SQL injection vuln found at Panama Papers firm Mossack Fonseca
Why does this keep happening? SQL injection is possibly the easiest security flaw to avoid.
Don't get me wrong, this Panama leak has been nothing short of gut-bustingly hilarious. But how are we as a profession meant to be taken seriously when programmers keep making the same stupid elementary mistake over and over and over again?
The future of Firefox is … Chrome
Read America's insane draft crypto-borking law that no one's willing to admit they wrote
The BBC flashes £560m ICT deal at hungry tech suppliers
Adobe preps emergency Flash patch for bug hackers are exploiting
Trump carded again: Hotel security aced
Re: Sigh...
How's this for the right reason?
He's probably going to continue to push for weakening privacy, encryption, security, etc, even after this incident. We don't need somebody who's this clueless about the importance of security and privacy in IT bossing the IT industry around. The prospect of a PHB with the power to change the law to his whim is horrifying in all its aspects.
Strike! EPO staff to walk out this Thursday
Bloaty banking app? There's a good chance it was written in Britain
I think that LOC as a measure of programmer productivity went out in the 90s when a number of programmers who weren't prepared to continue playing along started being factious and filing negative values for the lines of code they'd written during code optimisations.
As a measure of code quality it could still have some use (more LOC = more scope for bugs, harder to maintain, etc) but you have to offset that against the complexity of the problem being solved. An image viewer is always going to have fewer LOC than a database (unless the former is really sloppily written). If comparing like for like applications with similar levels of functionality I'd tend to prefer the one with fewer LOC
Flaw found in Lhasa makes for compression confession depression
NASA celebrates 50-year anniversary of first spaceship docking in orbit
I remember watching the reconstruction/dramatisation of Gemini 8 on HBO's From The Earth To The moon (and if you're a space nut it's well worth checking out!), and thinking "No, that can't be how bad it really got, they must be exaggerating the roll excursion for dramatic effect".
Then I saw the footage from the actual mission. Nope, they weren't exaggerating all that much.
Millions menaced as ransomware-smuggling ads pollute top websites
Michigan shooter says 'mind controlling' Uber app told him to kill
Only 12% of UK thinks Snoopers' Charter is 'adequately explained'
Chinese boffins grow new eye lenses using stem cells
Airbus' Mars plane precursor survives pressure test
Sexism isn't getting better in Silicon Valley, it's getting worse
Oracle tweaks exchange rate, hikes up database prices in UK
Bill Clinton killed off internet taxes, says Australian politician
Oracle's old hands are supporting the support n00bs who support you
First working Apple Mac ransomware infects Transmission BitTorrent app downloads
Yeah, first thing I did when I got home was triple-check everything on the list of signs I'd been infected, none of the described symptoms showed up.
I've shit-canned Transmission anyway though, a) to be on the safe side and b) because my trust in them has been destroyed. Also running a very thorough virus/malware scan that's probably going to take until tomorrow.