DRM
I especially like that it won't capture DRM content. Like, they do understand privacy / right not to be recorded, just not yours.
65 publicly visible posts • joined 27 Aug 2010
Yeah I think this is a big part of the justification internally too: When you sell your car your account isn't transferable, so your subscriptions end.
I have a(n extensively) used 2015 i3 and I guess this was a test model for the "connected drive store", since this is where I have to pay if I want map updates, online access, etc.
I have a Spark myself & multiple owners over on the official forum have had drones drop out of the sky without warning. If the firmware update addresses that, why would you NOT make it compulsory?
More interesting is that they haven't actually come out & said they've fixed that. I suspect they're rather under-playing the 'battery firmware changes' rather than making themselves liable for damages...
I disagree, my old Note 2 on Three was landed with a pile of random lock-up bugs which I could ultimately only fix by replacing the Three image with a pure Samsung one I found online.
The operators still can and control the image update process and they certainly don't push updates monthly. For phones more than a couple of years old it's more likely never.
Well, just like the original mono product, when they say "e-paper" they do not mean e-ink, though they're happy for you to make the assumption.
In fact it's just a more-reflective-than-usual LCD panel.
What they called transflective, back in the days of the original iPaq.
I've had excellent results with a Duplicator 4S, which is basically a £700 clone of the Makerbot Replicator Dual. This will print ABS, which is "strong enough", as well as PLA. I've printed functional stuff like replacement curtain track clips with it, as well as prettier stuff like these Raspberry Pi cases & stuff, here.
Can't imagine I'd have been much happier if I'd spent 4x more on a machine.
You can get a Raspberry Pi and an SD Card for about £30 and run all of your Spectrum games on the TV via the Fuse emulator. You can make it auto-boot the emulator if you like.
I know this because I do it and 3D-printed a case (or two) for mine - https://www.flickr.com/photos/pyramidhead76/15845903305/
But you obviously don't need the printed case to play the games...
It's difficult to explain without a diagram but doing it in one step would result in a jagged image since you'd be visibly dropping pixels.
By rendering in two steps - First at the imaginary 2208x1242 resolution and then scaling down, you can blend the dropped pixels into their nearest neighbours.
It's likely that the GPU can do this anti-aliased down-sampling operation in very little time.
I think UK law varies a lot depending on if you're a hobbyist - Mostly common sense and contained within this doc:
http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/33/CAP658%204%20Edition%20Amend%201%20June%202013.pdf
... Or doing "commercial aerial work", where the regulations & licensing seem to be more complex http://www.caa.co.uk/default.aspx?catid=1995&pageid=11213
But... They do and already did release high res photos and all raw images. I posted the links the last time around.
Edit: Here - How much higher res did he want? These were available the day after it made the news.
http://tinyurl.com/nw2kjeu
The rest are here: http://tinyurl.com/bnm2z
And I'd say it's reasonable to suspect this image shows the hole in the ground that the rock was flicked up from: http://tinyurl.com/qg983lp
NASA kindly make all of their raw images for spirit/opportunity (and MSL) available to all for free & practically in real time.
Opportunity raw images here: http://marsrover.nasa.gov/gallery/all/opportunity.html
And a particularly good shot of the mystery object here: http://marsrover.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/m/3541/1M442544805EFFCAEOP2955M2M1.JPG
It's about time ESA did the same thing...
I know The Reg is based in the UK, but this is a Ford concept out of the USA, where there's no shortage of space (in most, but not all places) for parking & building concentrators at home or at work. There's also no shortage of sunlight for millions of potential buyers there.
Just because something might not work in central London doesn't mean it's a bad idea for everyone.
It's worth repeating that NASA put all of the raw images for this mission online almost immediately for anyone interested to look at:
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/multimedia/raw/
The MAHLI camera is used for these wheel inspections - http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/multimedia/raw/?s=490&camera=MAHLI
What multi-leg technology existed in 2011 when this was launched?
The Boston Dynamics stuff is all absolute state of the art as we move into 2014 & seems to require more electrical power (via a petrol generator) than the rover can provide even now. I don't think we'll see robots running around mars just yet.
Agreed: The FEAR of screwing up computers is a very strong limiting factor against tinkering, and not just for children. For me this is the absolutely critical difference between 'Today's Family Netbook' and the 8/16 bit computers many of us 30-somethings grew up with, it's not just about the cost.
If you totally, utterly screw up your Pi OS & don't know how to fix it, you can just stick in your backup SD card and carry on within 30 seconds. No harm done.
A bit like this one?
http://hackaday.com/2013/03/05/finally-a-machine-that-makes-cheap-3d-printer-filament/
But if you read up on the Cube it's strongly implied that their refil carts feature DRM 'so that the printer knows how much filament is left' (AKA so that you can't just feed it cheap PLA from someone else)
Correct. Jake is embarrassing himself by repeatedly insisting he's right when he's demonstrably not.
* A padlock opened only by a key (something you have) is 1-factor authentication.
* A padlock opened only by a pin (something you know) is 1-factor authentication.
* If you had a padlock with both, *that* would be two-factor authentication.
Claiming that the lock itself is a factor if authentication is just plain wrong: Making a payment with your chip & PIN card is 2-factor auth. Making a payment with a NFC 'tap to pay' card is 1 factor auth.
*Waits for Jake's downvote*
"...seamless and enhance the user experience"
I understand that they have to add ads, fine. But... No experience in my lifetime has ever been enhanced by the addition of adverts, or likely ever will be. I suspect I'm not alone.
You have to wonder if these people *actually believe* what they're saying sometimes. I think I'd prefer if they knew it was bullshit, but I think they really might believe it...
This basically already exists in the Chameleon.
http://www.syntiac.com/chameleon.html
You can power it from USB (no actual C64 required) and have an FPGA-based C64 running cycle correct and plugged into a VGA monitor. You can even stick Amiga or Spectrum firmwares on the FPGA instead & have those running in hardware.
Well, therein lies a very interesting question: Would the author apply the Freetard label to paying Netflix subscribers who are sitting in the UK watching US content?
I'm sure that commercially & probably legally, it's clear: Those people are viewing unlicensed content.
But to Andrew, is this THE SAME as piracy, or a grey area?
I was going to post much the same thing. There are almost no fields in which you'd take a set of 'unusually gifted' people and proclaim that their average would be 'better' than any of the individuals.
You might argue that you average out the flaws, but you can't do that without averaging out the, err, peaks.
"What do you do when it locks up tighter than a nun's knickers?"
Hold POWER+HOME until it powers off. Although this combo is detected by the OS if operational, after 10 seconds it's a hardware reset switch which cannot be prevented regardless of what's locked up. I imagine it's implemented this way *because* you can't just pull the battery.
I've had to do this a few times to a jailbroken iPod Touch.
Ah, I see: When you say "You" you actually mean "You if you work in the USA". Which a lot of your readers still don't.
In the UK it's common to see T&Cs that require you not to damage the reputation of your employer. But just lately the news seems to be full of employers embarrassing their staff...
"opting NHS patients into its data-sharing plans would help remove delays within the system"
This really is double-speak at its worst: "Opt: To make a choice or decision from a range of possibilities"
If the proposed system had any credibility they'd have the courage of conviction to rely on opt-in on a per-patient basis.
What's proposed instead is that all data is stolen and re-sold, with patients later given some (most likely obscure) mechanism to opt out. It's clearly not compatible with either the spirit or the letter of DP laws to use people's medical data in this way.