* Posts by Davidoff

255 publicly visible posts • joined 12 Aug 2010

Page:

Apple's TV killer 'on shelves by summer 2012'

Davidoff

"All those controls for audio, color, brightness, alignment, etc. were behind tiny little holes in the back panel. So I wouldn't call those 'simple'."

I haven't seen any TVs that had these controls on the backpanel, but maybe European TV sets were different. The only control that was found on the back was VSYNC on older sets that required manual fiddling with it.

"Also, in the US at least, there were two knobs for VHF (channels 2-12, of which every other one could be used) and UHF (13-80 or something). The UHF one only worked when the VHF knob was set to the non-channel that designated UHF."

In Europe, such controls were common on smaller black & white portables and on very early living room TV sets, but the latter got adjustable channel selectors quickly.

"And you had to ACTUALLY GET UP OFF THE COUCH to change the channel!! Oh the humanity!"

Reminds me on my 1969 Philips Goya 110SL color TV set which not only had standby (to keep the tubes preheated so that the startup was quick) but also a remote control (a box with 4 channel selectors and volume, connected to the TV set via a 10m finger-thick cable).

Good old times;-)

Is Bill Gates mulling a return to Microsoft throne?

Davidoff
FAIL

Wisdom, yeah right

I didn't think there are still people which believe that Gates actually said something like '640k RAM is enough'. Well, he didn't, he never said something like that. It's an UL set in place for the simple minded.

Second US Navy robot stealth bomber takes flight

Davidoff

It's not just you

I personally find the current trend to use drones to kill 'insurgents' remotely highly worrying, especially when considering the colateral damage.

On the other side, taking out the element of human control is probably the next logical step for a country's military force that has proven again and again to be rather incompetent in general warfare and tactics, and only knows how to solve problems by throwing a shitload of money at it.

HP's server, PC, and printer businesses stumble

Davidoff
WTF?

Workstations and games

"Workstation sales rose by 12 per cent to $593m, which just goes to show you what happens when some good 3D games come out. "

Yeah, right. I can see how all these gamers rush out to purchase a £4k z800 workstation just to play Battlefield 3.

Valve says credit card data taken

Davidoff

AES256

Valve already said that the credit card data was AES256 encrypted.

Why they didn't simply encrypt other sensible data (i.e. address, list of registered games) as well is beyond me. After all, not only credit card data can be used for identity theft.

Oracle gives Solaris 11 final spit and polish

Davidoff
WTF?

"Try running Windows 7 on something from 2005"

Runs fine on a HP P4 1.7GHz from 2001, and even better on a Dell P4 from 2005.

"... or AIX 5.3"

Runs fine on a 44P-170 from 2000.

"or HP-UX 11"

Runs fine on a HP9000 B180L from 1997.

And your point was?

Farewell then, Sony Ericsson

Davidoff

> (and ultimately disappointing) P990

I had a P990i. Yes, the first firmware versions were a PITA, but Sony fixed most of the issues in later updates. The main problem of the P990i was the small RAM (64MB) which meant that there was not much room for many apps running concurrently.

> If only SE had been able to build on the success of the P800/9x0, rather than making them worse.

Well, I can say that the P1i (the successor of the P990i) I bought later was the best phone I ever had. Compact, reliable, (for that time) good camera), great keyboard, good touchscreen (resisitive, could be used with gloves on), and a stable OS (Symbian with UIQ interface) that was light on ressources but was also easy to use.

It's really a shame that Nokia has paired Symbian with their atrocious S60 user interface. Quartz (UIQ) was so much better in many ways and could have made Symbian able to compete with Android and iOS on a par level.

PC sales tank on fears of Meltdown, Part Deux

Davidoff
Thumb Down

Vista vs W7 requirements

"Windows 7 runs on any computer that can run Vista. This must be the first time an OS from Microsoft does not require more powerful hardware than its predecessor."

That's not true. Vista runs even on a Pentium3 PC with 512MB (well, 'run' is probably not the right word, lets say it works), Windows 7 doesn't. BTDT.

British warming to NUKES after Fukushima meltdown

Davidoff
FAIL

Joe Average and his opinion

"What the poll certainly indicates is that people are more rational than scaremongers suggest – and perfectly capable of performing risk analysis, weighing up the costs and benefits of a technology."

@ the author: if you really think that average people who for most part neither possess the required knowledge nor have all the information that is required for a valid risk analysis then you're delusional. What Joe Average 'knows' comes from the media (means: you) which gladly reproduce what is spoon-fed by them by the lobbying industry like to a parrot.

Like with all more complex topics, the general public as such has no f***ing clue. People vote for representatives which act against their interests, and often can't even keep their own computer malware-free. And now you want to tell us they suddenly have become experts in nuclear power generation?

HP's UK PC boss: We're going nowhere

Davidoff
Thumb Down

Consumer support != business support

"http://furbian.blogspot.com/2011/08/hp-envy-17-17-desktop-replacement.html"

So someone who bought a 'refurbished' consumer laptop at Curry's which (knowing Curry's) very well could have been a customer return which they tried to get rid of, and then complains that 'support' means calling a hotline? Of course consumer support is lacking and unhelpful, no matter what brand. This is because the sad truth is that many consumers are indeed the morons they are treated as by hotliners, and they rarely show brand loyality unless it's an Apple product. Consumer products also only compete on price, and there is hardly any room for proper local support with experienced technicians. You get what you pay for.

The point is that if support is important then don't buy a consumer toy, but a professional computer which is well supported. If you're too cheap and prefer the consumer crap then don't complain about poor support, period.

Also, this guy said he's not an idiot but then he buys a 'refurbished' laptop from Curry's, which generally means 'this laptop has been returned by the previous buyer as faulty but we didn't find a fault or couldn't be bothered looking, and it's condition doesn't allow us to sell it as new so we sell it as refurbished'. The word 'refurbished' has been widely mis-used and generally means 'it's second-hand but we like to avoid this word'. In case of HP, everything which has been truely factory refurbished is called HP RENEW, and this is also visible from the model number (trailing 'R'). But he obviously didn't buy HP RENEW, he bought a second grade item which is a well known tactics in Curry's and all the other gadget chains.

I'd say it's his own fault. Having written some Assembler programs obviously doesn't make one knowing the IT business.

Davidoff
WTF?

Lenovo and the quality myth

"HP makes a good Laptop. But I would never buy one. Why. They are too big, too clunky and too plastic."

Yes, their consumer models (Pavilion/Presario). Their business laptops are really solid devices.

"They are massive, like folding desktops! "

WTF? Are you shipping at Toys-R-Us only or what? A quick look at the HP website should have told you that this statement is BS. There are lots of HP laptop models from tiny 10" netbooks to 19" mobile workstations.

"But I would purchase Lenovo simply because of it's metal case, matte finish and much thinner form factor even with the same perfomrmance."

Good luck. Lenovo builds crap, too, as did IBM before. Want examples? Thinkpad T61: cracking display covers, breaking inner frames (which are not made out of some magical steel but cheap diecast aluminium), and cheap hinges which either came loose or seized/after a while; Or the Thinkpad T41/T42 which easily overheated because of insufficient cooling and which showed lots of mainboard defects because of warping (caused by lifting your laptop on one side only). And there are many more cockups in many Thinkpad models. Go figure.

Oh btw: there is no Lenovo laptop with metal case. It's all some kind of plastics (Lenovo claims it's some superstrong composite for certain parts, but experience has shown that it's hardly more robust than cheap plastics). If you want a laptop with a metal case then you have to buy a Panasonic Toughbook.

If you think that Lenovo is better than others then you're delusional.

Game denies Steam threat claims

Davidoff
Thumb Down

Steam, passwords and work email addresses

"a few months ago i tried to play a steam game i had bought, only to find that i now had to log in with a password as they had enabled some sort of system to track your titles to your pc. they had sent me an email to the company i had previously worked for (which ceased trading) and i couldnt get access to any of my games for a week while they sorted that out. ive never had this issue with a dvd/cd!"

So in short, you bought a game on Steam, then lost your Steam password (which is always required to log into the Steam service!), and you also didn't bother to update the now invalid email address you gave them in the first place (who in his right mind would give them a work email address anyways?).

So well, yes, if you can't take care of a few simple things then I guess CD/DVD media may be better for you.

Google dumps TV flop on UK

Davidoff
WTF?

US super quality broadband

"Has Google noticed that in the UK we don't have the same super quality broadband quality that is enjoyed by American's?"

I'm not sure on which planet you're living on but here on planet Earth broadband in the US is a far stretch from being 'super quality'. Unless you live in a few advantaged areas 'broadband' often means getting something less than 2Mbps, down to 384 kbps. Additionally, thanks to the telecommunications and cable tv oligopol you often don't even have a choice between providers but you're stuck paying for a 6Mbps line with 768kbpsor less real world throughput. That means if you can get any broadband service, that is. Wide parts of the country are still dependent on analogue modems.

Most Brits don't really appreciate what they have. A wide selection of broadband providers with tons of contracting options to fit most requirements is something Americans can only dream of.

iPHONE 5 SHOCK! US Apple store 4G kit-fit snapped

Davidoff
WTF?

Be careful, '4G' in the US != '4G' in the UK

"The US has more 4G than the UK has 3G (except for London)."

Be careful, the Yanks even label 3G and 3.5G networks as '4G' so you're comparing apples to oranges. In Europe, '4G' means LTE, '3.5G' means HSDPA/HSUPA, '3G' means UMTS, and 2G means GSM with GPRS or EDGE. In the USA. '4G' means LTE but also means HSDPA/HSUPA and even UMTS, '3G' means 'EDGE' and '2G' means GSM+GPRS and WCDMA. Apples and oranges.

Additionally, what many in the UK consider to be '3G' (which really is plain UMTS) is in fact already 3.5G (HSDPA/HSUPA). And it's even broadly available in the UK countryside already (and coverage is growing).

Add to this that many areas in the US don't even have any basic GSM or WMCDA cell phone coverage at all (and thanks to the American oligopol they have thanks to the 'free unregulated market' they so strongly believe in, and which already presents them with ridiculously expensive price plans and no real choice, this won't change soon), and the picture for good ol' UK looks much brighter.

AutoCAD LT arrives on the Mac

Davidoff
WTF?

Apple gear is not professional

"Quote: 'Apple is actually moving the Mac away from the professional user'

Based on what?"

Based on their offerings? The Mac Pro has laughable expansion capabilities (32GB RAM my ass), and unlike with its older counterparts there aren't even professional graphics boards (Nvidia Quadro, AMD FireGL/FirePro) available. On the other side, that probably isn't really a problem because the Mac OS graphics drivers suck big time. And of course the Mac Pro lacks certification for the majority of relevant professional applications out there. It's a joke.

"I wouldn't use anything else for my business - Apple equipment is good value for money its software isn't 'in-your-face' (you can focus on your job), and the hardware/software combo holds up well under pressure."

Maybe your work isn't really demanding then. As to 'value for money', £1800+ for a single processor machine with consumer graphics is anything but 'value for money', a real workstation like a HP z400 can be had with better config, professional graphics and 3 year onsite warranty (compared to the Mac's laughable 1 year bring-in) for less money. And this is a system where ISV support won't turn their head away in disgust because it isn't supported.

"If you're on a Mac, there are better choices, e.g. VectorWorks, ArchiCAD, and many others." Most of the CAD packages for Mac are lowend or for a limited niche (architects). None of the grownup ones like CATIA, SolidWorks or Pro/E are available for Mac (and most of them are still available for old UNIX workstations from Sun and HP, go figure!), which is very likely because Apple at the end of the day does not have any professional gear (aka Workstations). All Apple offers are very expensive consumer PCs.

VMware backs down on vSphere 5 virtual memory tax

Davidoff
WTF?

@Lee

"most people who have to implement and run the things prefer VMware hands down."

Yes, but mainly because they were used to VMWare in the first place and had no former Hyper-V experience. And yes, if you're afraid to use a command line on Windows, then Hyper-V won't be for you.

"MS Cluster services with CSVs to run properly, which is a frankly poor solution to a very critical problem. You will notice a MS cluster failover - maybe not to the extent that it impacts business but nevertheless."

I can't see how CSV which also provides storage migration amongst other goodies and which can deal with a wide variety of situations to be a 'frankly poor solution'. Live Migration *is* essentially seamless, we did quite a few tests and didn't even loose the ping. It certainly wasn't noticable for an user.

"VMware FT is essentially seamless."

VMWare FT (hint: FT = 'Fault Tolerance') is something completely different than HA (which stands for 'High Availability'). VMWare FT is essentially RAID1 for VMs. However, as far as I know it only works with VMs with 1vCPU, and both VMs have to be on the same VMFS volume. It also means for every VM you essentially double the required ressources (real CPU, RAM, storage space, and last but not least energy) which makes it very expensive. Unless you really *NEED* FT (and there probably won't be many situations where FT is really required), you're better off with HA.

"Hyper-V does some things very well, and others poorly. VMware does some things very well and others very expensively."

vSphere (VMWare is the company, not the product) does some things very well (almost everything is very expensive), some things poorly and some things not at all. Aside from GPU Virtualization (wich especially for the technical/scientific sector is a very interesting feature) until vSphere 5 arrives it can't even handle LUNs over 2TB (2TB minus 512bytes), which quite frankly in this day and age with single hard drives reaching 3TB this is quite frankly embarassing for a product which is probably the one with the longest market presence.

"You just need to look at what you are trying to do and then implement the solution that best fits your needs, within the obvious constraints of cost and functionality."

That's something which I can agree on.

Davidoff
FAIL

Hyper-V bashing

"So you need to burn through bags of CPU and RAM resources running the horribly complex and resource intensive MS System Centre suite on top of a Hypervisor that is broadly as capable as ESX 3 (without the memory handling or vSwitch capabilities)."

You might want to check first with current offerings of Hyper-V, and you'll see that its much more capable than ESX 3. CSV might be a cludge, but on the other side you get things like GPU Virtualization, something which you can't get from VMWare, not even for ridiculous money, And even very basic things like the ability to handle LUNs >2TB were not possible with vSpehere including the still current 4.1 (the new vSphere 5 finally supports LUNs >2TB) are a walk in the park with Hyper-V. Go figure.

BTW: You don't need SCVMM (which in the latest version is quite good) to manage Hyper-V. There is the free RSAT (Remote Server Administration Tools) which is simple and easy, and there are 3rd party tools available as well.

Hyper-V may have the reputation to be unreliable and a ressource hog or whatever with a certain group (apparently those who haven't used the current implementation), but with every version its coming out stronger and better. Not to forget that there already are shops that virtualize on Hyper-V and it works for them. So trying to create the impression that every Hyper-V migration must fail because it's soo much worse than vSphere makes you look silly.

Davidoff
WTF?

vSphere alternatives

"I sure hope you're planning a slow migration so you can see how Hyper-V performs in a "massive" farm before you fully commit."

I've seen Hyper-V in a 'massive' farm and it does what it says on the tin.It even offers features you have to pay quite a lot for with VMWare (High Availability) or which aren't available at all (GPU Virtualization).

This aside, every solution has its problems, even vSphere is far from being trouble-free.

"I suspect it won't take you long to figure out why enterprises are paying for VMware vs. using "free" hypervisors like Hyper-V and Xen."

They probably do because their external consultant agency has told them to do it. More often than not such decisions are made on purely non-technical facts.

BTW: Hyper-V itself is only free as bare hypervisor ('Hyper-V Server'), in combination with Windows Server ('Windows Server with Yper-V') however it does cost money. Xen as Citrix XenServer is also not free.

VMWare vSphere is great if your environment is heavily heterogenous. However, in a mostly homogenous environment (like Windows) Hyper-V does the job very well, and without having to pay exorbitant prices.

Apple vanishes MySQL from Mac OS X Lion Server

Davidoff
Thumb Down

Because IT Security is actually important to you?

"You can get a server in the cloud for a fraction of the cost of buying and maintaining a physical box."

Yeah, right, trusting all your data to 'The Cloud' is great unless the data you have is somehow critical and valuable to your business. How vulnerable cloud providers are has been shown recently on more than one occasion.

"If you do have a vital need for a server on a short leash bandwidth and latency wise, you can get an Intel box for a few hundred bucks and put Ubuntu on it. (Mine has 4G, mirrored 1T disks, an admittedly trailing edge AMD64 dualcore, but cost in the $500 range - the case, motherboard and processor came for free)."

Well, Ubuntu may be fine, but I would at least make sure that the hardware is actually reliable and supported by its vendor.

Nokia unveils budget Symbian smartie

Davidoff
WTF?

Rob Moss FAIL?

"Why bother releasing a Symbian phone without a GPU?"

Because a GPU is not needed if the intention is not to use the phone as a gaming device.

"I've used the Nokia X6 with Symbian and it was awful compared to any other touchscreen phone out there now."

Right, so what? FYI: the X6 is OLD, it is from 2009 which is *antique* by todays standards, and the Symbian S60 it runs has very little in common with the modern Symbian^3 Anna which runs on the Nokia 500. If you're really surprised when a 2 year old entry-level smartphone can't keep up with the latest Andoid smart phones then you should get your head examined.

Now, if you look at more modern offerings from Nokia like the N8 or the C7, the situation is different. They hold up quite well against similarly priced Andoid phones, and while they may lack the high number of fart apps that are available for Android, they come with global offline navigation as standard, don't track your whereabouts for their manufacturer, and unlike other smartphones can sustain several days with a single battery charge and provide great call quality. Go figure.

It's official: IE users are dumb as a bag of hammers

Davidoff
FAIL

"Any IT company involved in web development will acknowledge... "

"!...the fact that millions of man hours are wasted each year to make otherwise perfectly functional websites work in Internet Explorer,"

Yes, when IE6 was the latest variant of IE, which it isn't for over half a decade. We're at IE9 now (and IE8 for XP users), something which they obviously have missed.

This 'study' is a bag of pseudo-scientific BS. Maybe it's done because they were in need for some funding or they are just after the publicity. At the end of the day, many years ago it had worked very well for a certain wannabe-scientist from NZ with his pseudo-scientific 'study' about Windows Vista.

Dell PowerEdgies built like Marilyn Monroe

Davidoff
Thumb Up

Quiet and slower

I don't know the Dell servers but with HP ProLiants (ML300 series and most of the DL300/500 series as well) you can set the fan control properties ("Full speed" for rack operation in a data center or "Thermally controlled" for offices) in the BIOS, as well as the power settings (i.e. power efficient). With the ILO2 Advanced license you can also monitor and even limit the power consumption (Watts).

Major overhaul makes OS X Lion king of security

Davidoff
WTF?

OS X Lion king of security? Yeah, right.

It's more like Prince Valium who is always late to the party. Don't get me wrong, it's great that OS X finally gets a sensible implementation of ASLR, but that doesn't change the fact that it merely catches up with Windows and some Linux distros. The same is true for full disk encryption. BitLocker is available since November 2005 when Vista came out. It's great FDE is now available in Mac OS X but it only took them 6 years to catch up.

This is nothing new, though. Mac OS has mostly been last to the party in terms of major technology changes like implementing pre-emptive multitasking or moving to 64bit.

But then, what can you expect from the two authors of the "The Mac Hacker's Handbook"?

Adaptec adds DRAM cache to entry-level RAID

Davidoff
FAIL

Whoever believes that Hardware RAID is always faster than Software RAID knows jack shit

"Hardware RAID will always offer a way better performance than software solutions for too many reasons other than the obvious ones."

That's utter BS. More often than not, Hardware RAID performs much worse than software-based RAID solutions, especially with entry level controllers like the ones in this article which have a simple XOR engine and no I/O processor. Hardware RAID comes from an aera where your average CPU would become quickly overwhelmed by the amount of XOR calculations required for the better RAID levels (5, 6). Today, in the days of superfast multicore processors, that's a different story. In most environments the necessary XOR calculations cause negligible load on the main processors for small to medum arrays. However, the reason hardware RAID controllers still exist today is that for bigger arrays, the CPU load increases, taking away CPU performance from the main tasks. So in scenarios where demanding applications are used, it makes sense to use a good(!) hardware RAID controller to keep the CPU free from doing RAID calculations. It doesn't mean the Hardware RAID is faster, though. It just means the CPU can spend more time on its main tasks.

BTW: many storage arrays of today are just that - a huge software RAID, running on a PC as controller. That's "for proper reliable and fast RAID storage solutions" for you.

So next time you should get a clue before labeling others as "little kids with no knowledge of how hardware and software work and what RAID is", or you will again look as stupid as you do now.

Entering a storage jail

Davidoff
FAIL

The myth about licenses

"You don't own the music on CDs either - you merely have a license to play/watch them, and then only within specified parameters (e.g. you can't screen them in your local community hall)."

That is not true (at least not in Europe and the UK, in Gods Own Country the situation is different, though), but you're not the only one falling for the crap that the content industry wants you to believe in.

If you go in a store and purchase a music CD then there is no license involved. Most sales of music CDs or movie DVDs are sales of goods, and the good is the physical storage medium with the information on it. There may be 'license terms and conditions' printed inside the cover but since they never became part of your purchase contract they are legally irrelevant. Also, the contract is only between you and the seller and not between you and the producer/publisher/artist. A music CD is in no way different to buying a book, where again you don't just buy a 'license to read' but actually own the physical medium (paper, cardboard) *and* the information on it. And you can do with it what you want in the framework that the law allows you - smash it, sell it on, lend it to your friend, etc.

The reason you can't play a CD in your community hall is said framework, which in this instance is the copyright law. While you own the information on your CD, you don't have the copyright, which limits the audience you can make the content available to. In the UK, the stringent copyright law doesn't have provisions for private copying, and thus yes, copying the CD or converting it into a different format for your MP3 player would be illegal.

So no, buying a music CD doesn't involve any license, as does buying a book, a movie DVD/Bluray disk, or even a standard software package. Of course the media industry wants you to believe that you have no rights on the goods you purchased, as this way they can dictate consumers what to do and what not.

Sony pains pre-owned game punters with PSN Pass

Davidoff
WTF?

Stealing?

"The developers and producers make these games, and once a company like Game steps in, buys your old game off you for a few quid and then sells it for 10, the developers and producers make nothing for their hard work and Game effectively pirates it."

That's nonsense. The devs got rewarded through the original sale, and then the good (a DVD with the game on it) belongs to me, period. And I can do with my property whatever I want.

But I guess if you sell your car then you give a share of the money you got to the car manufacturer, right? And if you sell your house, I guess you give a part of the money to the builder who built the house at some point in the past, or to his descendants. No? Why not? Following your crude logic, if you don't give them a share, you're effectively stealing from them.

Of course game publishers want to drain some of the money that goes in 2nd hand games. However, they are only able to get through with it if their customers actually are that stupid to believe they are stealing from the devs when selling or buying used games.

"Once enough people can't buy the game and sales fall off then the prices have to come down, and arsehole companies like EA make less billions and start treating their paying customers better - like perhaps stopping putting bullshit DRM into their products."

Yeah, in your dreams maybe. Here on Planet Earth they more likely will claim the low sales on piracy and then come up with even stronger measures, as they did in the past.

By now it should be very obvious that the aim of the gaming industry is to get their customers away from the 'pay one play forever' model where games come on physical media to a 'pay-per-use' model where they can charge gamers for the time they are playing. They have made this more than clear on various occasions, and you have to be very thick to miss that. The beginning was made by Valve with STEAM games like HL2 where only a part of the game is on the physical media, and the game is locked to a certain user account.Later supplemented by online activation (with a limited amount of activations of course), digital distribution, DLC (charging for content which should have come with the game), requiring an online connection when playing single player games, and now it's activation codes for multiplayer. Of course all these charged-for options are not transferrable. If you really believe that they will ever go back to DRM-free distribution you're delusional.

Game publishers found that a big part of their customer base is retarded enough to swallow the constant blame on piracy (games are never low because a title is crap, sure) and happily pay for slices of a game which used to come in one piece. Look at when EA introduced their permanent online requirement. Everyone cried but in the end there were enough idiots who actually purchased this crap.

Can virtualisation rejuvenate your old servers?

Davidoff
FAIL

An article based on hear-say and guesswork?

As some other poster I also do question the author's expertise in the field of virtualization, and wonder if he has any practical experience as the article suggests he's at least living on a different planet at a different year.

"Think about it. Multi-core processors are now commonplace, whereas the average three-year-old server will have single or dual-core CPUs at best." Maybe the author has spent the last few years in a coma but intel doesn't make any single core server processors since at least 2006, and quadcores are available since at least 2007 (and AMD is not much different). Think about it! An average 3 year old server probably uses at least some dual core processor, and very likely it will already have quadcore processors. In 2009, the only single core processors still manufactured are probably the ones used in embedded devices like cellphones and other speciality applications.

"You could easily find your processors unable to support the latest hypervisors, many of which demand on-chip technologies such as Intel VT or AMD-V before they will play ball." Yes, if your server is from 2003 maybe. intel VT is available since at least 2005, and AMD-V since at least 2006, and both were quickly integrated in their line of server processors.

"Moreover, with Intel’s Nehalem and the latest AMD Opteron architectures you can expect huge performance gains that enable you to consolidate hundreds of servers onto a minimal number of boxes, at the same time reducing power and cooling overheads." Again, if your server is from 2003 and runs a bunch of Netburst XEONs then maybe, but out of experience replacing a 3 year old server with a current pedant doesn't necessarily give you that much more oomph, unless the old server was really low-spec or inadequately spec'd for the task.

"The latest DDR3 RAM is, similarly, both cheaper and faster than what went before, plus you can now stuff a lot more into the average server." For your average consumer PC, maybe. In the server market DDR2 DIMMs (both Registered and Fully Buffered) have come down in price over time while the relative new DDR3 stuff (Registered or at least ECC) isn't that cheap. At the end of the day, it's probably much cheaper to upgrade a 3 year old server with more RAM than to buy a complete new system if RAM is the only bottleneck.

This article was really poor.

Lenovo to swallow German PC giant

Davidoff
FAIL

German manufacturer

Medion is certainly no German manufacturer. It is an assembler who puts together stock standard chinese parts and sticks either a Medion or some other label on it (Medion is also assembling low-end consumer PCs for other brands). Often they approach the asian component manufacturers and have them build spec'd down OEM components for them. For example, to build Nvidia cards with a low end GPU but with a card ID that to the clueless customer look like something great (Medion's sales concept is to offer paper specs which look great but which are not much better than any other low-end consumer PC, together with a shitload of software that for most part is either limited or simply useless (or both).

The last real German PC manufacturer was Fujitsu-Siemens who actually manufactured mainboards and complete PCs in Germany. However, this was only for their business line of PCs, most of their consumer crap (Amilo etc) was made by Medion and other OEMs.

Don't know how much changed since Siemens left the company, though.

Next-gen Atom CPU price halved to push netbooks

Davidoff
Thumb Down

Netbook vs laptop

" And lets be honest many who bought a netbook to start with won't bother replacing it but would go for a full laptop instead if its the form factor they want."

Well, wouldn't you think that they would have bought a full laptop in the first place if this is what they wanted? Since they bought a Netbook then maybe a full laptop is not what they want.

I, too, have a Netbook (admittedly one of the more 'grown up' models with 10" screen and higher resolution), but I bought it because I didn't want to carry around a full laptop with 14" or bigger display, and an optical drive I rarely need. Of course there are Subnotebooks but most of them are priced in the £1k+ range which is a bit high for what is essentially a portable web/email client and movie player. A Netbook fullfills this requirement at a much lower price. Why should I spend more for a full blown laptop that is so big and heavy that I rarely bother to take it with me anyways?

Tablets are en vogue at the moment, and I can see that they have their use in many areas. However, same as a laptop not always can replace a desktop PC (despite the latter being declared dead regularly for over a decade), a tablet is not always a proper replacement for a Netbook. There are many occasions where a device with no real keyboard is a no-go.

After the Netbook hype has been over sales have dropped to a normal level. The same will hapen to tablets once their novelty factor has worn off, and then the next better-than-sliced-bread gizmo comes along.

Dear Dell and Microsoft: You're not Apple

Davidoff
Thumb Down

Dell vs HP

"Having worked at Dells Pro Support department before (not in the US), as well as having used HP hardware extensively, Dells PCs, notebooks and monitors were far superior in terms of quality, reliability, performance and features."

If you look at their respective consumer lines (HP Presario/Pavilion, Dell Dimension/XPS/Inspiron) then this might be true, but having worked with tons of HP and Dell business PCs and workstations in the last 10+ years I wholeheartly have to disagree.

For example, Dell has produced the Precision 690 with two different mobos of which only one can work with quadcore processors. To find out if a 690 is actually upgradeable one has to open up the case and remove parts to check the mobo p/n because from outside there is no marking etc. telling you what mobo is inside. Dell does this quite often with many systems, just because one Dell model ABC works with a certain component doesn't mean another model ABC does the same. With HP, I know that all xw8400 (the predecessor to the Precision 690) works with quadcores, and while HP does use different mobo revisions I always know that they support exactly the same features.

Ever tried to get a replacement housing part (i.e. a side cover) for a Dell computer? Probably not, because it's not available (at least that was what I was told by Dells Pro support on various occasions). Want to know the p/n for a specific part? With Dell, unless you have the old part and the partnumber is readable you're lost. With HP, I just go to partsurfer.hp.com and search for the part I need. It also tells me alternative partnumbers, and of course also housing parts for most HP computers are available as spare.

Or lets talk about the lack of even very simple things. For years I can update a HP computer's BIOS by just putting the ROM file on a USB flash drive (doesn't need to be bootable) and then use the flash program that is integrated in the BIOS. With Dell I still have to flash from Windows or another OS.

or we could talk about BIOS support in general, like the non-working Speedstep support in the Precision 690 (which still remains unfixed). BTW: I know these machines are old, but intel has recently discovered a potentially critical flaw in the old Xeon 51xx/53xx processors and releases a microcode update. Guess what, HP has provided an updated BIOS for the now around 5 year old xw8400 (as it has for other HP computers using these processors). Dell did nothing, and according to their support they won't do anything.

Then the exterior. Just look at the older Optiplexes (or the older Precisions up to the 670) which had very cheap housings (thin metal covered with plastics panels) which showed a lot of flexing. HP's counterparts are worlds apart in terms of build quality.

Don't get me wrong, I like my Dell machines, but in terms of quality, reliability, features and performance HP beats them anytime. Not that reliability with Dell is bad, in my experience it's just a bit better with HP.

And you won't get something like a z800 from Dell.

Davidoff
Thumb Down

Windows is successful because you can hardly buy a PC without it

"Windows is successful because you can hardly buy a PC without it."

I'm really getting sick and tired of this nonsense. Just by repeating it doesn't become true.

There really are plenty of PCs available without Windows, both from plain assemblers and big brand names like HP or Dell. This of course is over the widespread availability of generic components to build your own PC.

If you really believe that you can hardly buy a PC without Windows I would suggest to sometimes lift your butt from that couch and open your eyes.

Steve Ballmer window-dresses Windows 8

Davidoff
Thumb Down

Vista

"Not for people like me, who bought Vista knowing its shortcomings, believing that Microsoft would eventually fix them, as indeed they did - but as a new product called Windows 7, which I need to buy to fix the fundamental bugs in Vista."

What bugs in Vista haven't been fixed that are in Windows 7? Seriously.

The big mistake MS made in Vista was that, while Vista was very sophisticated and had much more going on in the background than the old Windowsxp, MS didn't give the user interface a higher priority, resulting in users getting sick of seeing the rotating circle. There were also some other glitches like the file copy progress box, but most of them have been fixed in susequent updates and especially SP1.

After participating in the Beta program I also have been one of the early adopters (got Vista in November 2005 when it came out for business users so I even before it was released to the consumer market). Yes, the beginning was indeed very rough, but a lot of the fault for it goes to hardware and software vendors who simply ignored the long-running beta program came up with crap or even none hardware drivers. And this wasn't limited to some few unknown noname vendors, even Nvidia and ATI/AMD were on the list of offenders. It must have been really a surprise for them when MS finally put Vista to market, and it took them more than 6 months to come up with drivers that at least somewhat resembled 'usable'. So yes, initially there were several problems, but 9 months or so later most of them were gone, and I never regretted to have replaced XP with Vista on all but one of my computers. And I'm still using Vista on many of them as the cost of upgrading to Win7 is too high, compared with the negligible benefits.

Vista wasn't as bad as people say. MS made some mistakes, but it was deliberately damaged by ISVs and IHVs through the lack of initial support. And then there was the press who gladly gave wannabe-scientists like a certain self-declared security 'expert' from Norway a platform to publish his 'analysis' of Windows Vista, which he made without even coming near a PC running this OS, on which he used a mixture of wild guesses and deliberately mis-representing information, and which for most part of it, was just a stinkin' pile of crap.

Davidoff

No, it wasn't.

"It's because XP was the first version of MS WIndows that was genuinely usable in a professional networked computing environment."

No, it wasn't. WindowsNT 3.5 was already 'genuinely usable in a professional networked computing environment' (I've seen servers with uptimes of several years), and so have been its successors NT 3.51, NT4 and Windows 2000. The limited hardware support was hardly an issue in an environment where mostly certified brand name machines are bought anyways, and both NT 3.5(1) and NT 4 had quite long HCLs which still included a lot of standard hardware (and many hardware vendors not on the HCL did provide NT drivers). Of course NT 3.5(1) lacked the more modern Win95 GUI, or support for PnP (which at this time in fact was more 'Plug'n'Pray' and caused tons of issues in Win9x). NT4 then got support for ISA PnP but that was basically only implemented to configure jumper-less ISA cards like certain Soundblaster cards. But then, instead of relying on the half-arsed attempt to true PnP NT left distribution of ressources where at that time it belonged to, the BIOS.

The main reason why XP has received so much laudatio is simply it is that when it came out the unification of the NT stream and the Win9x stream was completed. Windows 2000 was the first NT variant that was developed to be used in both the professional market and the SoHo market (which was occupied by Win9x before) and therefore included things like full DirectX support (which NT4 never had), but being a first W2k suffered from the fact that many programs were still developed for Win9x. It also lacked the visual appeal for consumers. It was the first Windows version that fits in everything from a kid's gaming PC and Mum Clueless' typewriter-replacement and web/email station to office PCs and CAD workstations.

With Windowsxp MS did almost everything right (from a business point of view!). It had built on W2k's strengths and worked on many of its weaknesses, one being the desktop. Additionally, when XP came out in 2001 most new programs were already developed for the NT line (or at least W2k).

Intel, IBM, and HP back open source against VMware

Davidoff

Project Monterey

IBM was HP's partner in Project Monterey when Itanium hadn't yet completely failed.

Microsoft welcomes CentOS Linux onto virtualized Windows

Davidoff

No, they didn't forget.

MS doesn't need to be afraid of KVM on CentOS because they already offer their 'Hyper-V Server' for free, available as a download from the MS website. Hyper-V Server consists of Windows Server 2008 core and the Hyper-V hypervisor and supports many features like HA which is an expensive option with VMWare and XenServer.

And even their paid for option ('Windows Server with Hyper-V') isn't as expensive as it seems.

Nothing to lose but your desktop PCs

Davidoff
FAIL

Network latency

And regarding the networking performance: what makes you think thin clients have higher network latency than desktop PCs? That is utter nonsense. Thin clients use the same NICs that can be found in laptops and office PCs, which btw is valid for most of the other components aside from the DOM (Disk-On-Module) or CF card which is used as mass storage. And no, they don't become slower just because they are now used in a thin client.

Davidoff

Thin client fear

Well, that other OS (I assume you mean Windows) works just fine with thin clients, too. RDP's network footprint is relatively small, and with RDP 7.1 (RemoteFX) and GPU virtualization even many local workstations can be substituted by thin clients.

I guess many people are negative about thin clients because often enough VDIs are badly implemented. Also, users probably feel a loss of power (instead being trusted with a full capable PC they now get what they consider a 'dumb' terminal). But I agree, ressources are much better implemented in the server where they can be shared than by different users than in indivual PCs where they might sit there unused most of the time.

However, one thing I agree is that thin clients *are* overpriced, especially since most of the parts they use are cheap mass market components, and for the system builders a single Windows Embedded license costs even less than a license for desktop Windows. There is no reason why a thin client using an Atom processor, intel gfx, 1GB RAM, 2GB flash and WES2009 needs to be more expensive than a Nettop PC using the same components except that it comes with 2GB RAM, a 200+GB hard drive and a full Windows 7 license.

Davidoff
FAIL

@Antin Ivanov re thin client performance

I guess you have last seen a thin client 10 years ago because nothing you said has any resemblance to reality. Modern thin clients like the HP t5550 or t5740 use something in the region of 14W when under load(!) and less than 1W when powered off (yes, also measured at the outlet with a meter that can handle load factors other than 1 just fine). Your average A Coppermine P3 has a TDP somewhere between 25 and 38 Watts - and that is just for the processor! The chipset takes at least another 10 Watts, and then there is RAM, graphics, hard drive, fans, and a 10 year old power supply with an efficiency rating closer to 60-75% depending on Wattage and type. At the end of the day, your ancient P3 PC will easily consume around 60W or more.

And as to performance: most midrange thin clients use a Via Eden processor which is easily as fast as a P3 at a similar clock rate but only consumes around 4W. The graphics part is usually assumed by a ViaChrome shared memory graphics which thanks to a much more advanced GPU and fast dual DDR2 memory it easily gives the antique i81x graphics with its slow SDRAM memory a run for its money. Highend clients like the HP t5730 and t5740 use fast modern AMD Sempron and intel Atom processors, paired with Radeon X1250 or intel GMA 4500M HD graphics chipsets which are way ahead even of most AGP cards available in the P3 aera. And if that's not enough there are dedicated graphics thin clients like the HP gt series which come with dual core processors and dedicated graphics cards.

And all this while being absolutely silent, small, and using very little power.

Re-using old PCs as thin clients can make sense in certain limited cases, but generally it's a waste of money and energy.

Five amazing computers for under £100

Davidoff
FAIL

@TomH re still not a NeXT handheld computer

Some parts of NS/OS have survived in Mac OS X and iOS but that doesn't make it a NeXT handheld. With the same justification the author is using you could as well say the iPhone is a great IBM handheld or Sun handheld because they were capable of running a BSD with Mach kernel, too.

The fact is that the iPhone is neither made by NeXT nor does it run NeXTStep, OpenStep, or any applications developed for these operating systems.

If the iPhone is a "NeXT computer" then any cell phone running Android is a "SGI mobile Workstation", as Android knows many things (like OpenGL) that were available on the now long dead SGI MIPS workstations running IRIX and which have been released into OSS.

And by definition every car made by FIAT is now a Ferrari.

One could get the impression that the item is so poor that such ridiculous claims are necessary to make the item look good.

Davidoff

@The First Dave

Anbd iOS is very much based on Mac OS X. So what?

Davidoff
FAIL

Fast, open, NeXT handheld computer

I have heard many ridiculous claims of what an iPhone is but seriously. It may be some kind of computer (as are other cell phones), but it's certainly not fast, it's not open, and it definitely is not a 'NeXT handheld computer' as it doesn't run NeXTStep/OpenStep (and no, Mac OS X is *not* NeXTStep/OpenStep) or has any relation to NeXT Computers.

Also, in this day and age, £100 for a second hand cell phone without 3G is not a bargain, it's a rip-off. The Orange San Francisco (which until recently did cost £99 new) would have probably been a much better choise as it's faster and much more open than any iPhone ever was.

Nokia deal to 'rocket Windows Phone 7 past iPhone'

Davidoff
Thumb Down

UIQ and S60 are smartphones

You may not consider UIQ or early S60 devices to be smartphones, however the rest of the world does. And anyone who had the chance to compare the embarrassing OS that was called Windows Mobile 2003 with what Symbian devices could do will certainly agree. WM was a true PITA. The interface was basically the same as on desktop Windows (yes, it's really great for phones!), and even after the 2003SE update WM was crashprone and f*cking slow. If you then compare devices like the WM 2003 phones from HTC running 200+MHz processors and compare it with what Symbian/UIQ was capable on a SE P910i with a mere 143MHz processor and 16MB of RAM then it's no surprise WM got its reputation as being crap. Early Symbian devices were definitely much more 'smart' than any Windows Mobile device of that period, and while WM got better Symbian didn't stand still, too. There is a reason why Symbian was until very recently the leading smartphone operating system.

And as to UIQ, I think it was great. Unlike S60 it was designed with touchscreen operation in mind. A 1996 P990i for example does multitasking and c'n'p throughout the whole interface, something that in 2011 Windows Phone 7 still lacks. Unfortunately Nokia as the biggest Symbian vendor decided in it's indefinite stupidity to fiddle touch operation into a GUI that was designed for keyboard operation (S60) instead of using UIQ. The result is well known, Nokia missed the touchscreen trend, and once it catched up earned lots of complaints about the lacking and illogical GUI.

Really, saying that UIQ and early S60 devices weren't smartphones shows a severe lack of knowledge in this area.

Radioactive Tokyo tapwater HARMS BABIES ... if drunk for a year

Davidoff
FAIL

Page is a clueless hack writer

He has already proven that he has no clue about military aviation or anyof the other topics he wrote, and these were at least vaguely connected to his former career (IIRC he said he was a RN diver). So it seems being a diver makes one qualified to write about combat aircraft, and obviously it also makes him a nuclear specialist. So I guess all those that go to university to obtain appropriate degrees are clueless morons then.

Aside from Page being clueless about the topics in his articles, he also clearly has an agenda. That may be fine for an amateur, but that is not what I would expect from a professional journalist. Certainly everyone has a view on a topic, but there is some minimum level of balance and objectivity that a journalist should present. Page's articles are not polarizing, they are just plain crap, written to feed expedient optimistically readers desperately looking for confirmation that, no matter what happens, everything will be allright. I'm not sure a hack writer with zero demonstrated competencies or expertise in any of the topics he writes about is a good source of information.

I don't know what is more embarassing, Page's articles or that El Reg provides a forum for this crap. Which is a shame as most of the articles from the other authors are quite good.

Microsoft polishes Windows Phone 7

Davidoff
FAIL

Symbian is great

I can't see why Symbian is outdated: it was designed for low ressource consumption and does true multitasking and cut&paste for ages. Since it has been designed for low ressource consumption (unlike WM/WP7, Android or iOS!) can do with a slower CPU than what would be necessary for WP7, iOS or Android. And while 1GHz may look more impressive than 600MHz, one thing that should be remembered is that the clock rate heavily affects power consumption and thus battery lifetime. That's why Symbian phones operate much longer on a battery charge than comparable smartphones with WP7 or Android, or even the iPhones.

The only thing that is outdated with Symbian is the GUI (Nokia in its ignorance decided to uplift the button-centric S60 GUI to touch operation when there already were GUIs like UIQ which have been designed for touchscreens and which would have provided a much better starting point for a modern user interface), but that is not unfixable. The reason why nothing happened is purely down to Nokia's soviet-style management. In such an environment progress will always be slow and minimal at best, no matter if the OS is Symbian, MeeGo, Android or WP7.

Really, if you think that killing Symbian for a platform that means unified software, GUI and hardware and which in 2011 still lacks basic things like cut&paste and multitasking actually is a good thing then you're truly delusional. There is a reason why until very recently Symbian was the dominant smartphone OS.

TERRORISTS IN SUBMARINES menace the Free World!

Davidoff
Thumb Down

A flying RN Diving Officer?

Well, at least this explains why most of his aviation-related articles are rubbish.

What I don't understand is why The Reg believes that a ex RN Diving Officer is qualified to write about topics way outside his domain and (as often demonstrated) also his understanding.

Marry Microsoft, analyst tells Nokia

Davidoff
Thumb Down

Nokia never though CDMA is unimportant,...

they just had some differences with Qualcomm, the company that provides CDMA licenses. Because of the fight over CDMA licensing Nokia was unable to put more effort into CDMA phones for the NA market.

Nokia certainly never considered the CDMA market being unimportant.

PSP 2 'as powerful as PS3'

Davidoff
FAIL

Cell is not a 8-core processor FFS!

"So a 32-bit Quad-core ARM Cortex-A9 (up to 2GHz) is as powerful as a 64-bit 8-core 3.2GHz Cell processor?" No, because there is no 8-core Cell processor. Cell is a simple single PowerPC core with 8 co-processors (which are only fast for a few operations). This is far fom being the same like a symmetric 8-core processor, or even a quad-core processor.

Top CEOs agree: US is down the crapper

Davidoff
Thumb Down

@Aebblwoi

Americans are not afraid of the government (and even less of their state, as this is the level they can participate and which has the most direct influence to their lives), they just want the government to keep its nose out of their business, which is something completely different. This is also the reason why the US government could introduce procedures and regulations that violate human rights and even the US constitution. They probably should start to pay a bit more attention as to who is sitting in Washington, though.

Nationalizing banks is a bad idea. I'm all for a bit of socialism (especially when it comes to public services like transportation where everytime such a service has been privatized this lead to lower service and higher costs), but it's not purpose of the government to own everything (which is how most East European countries used to work, and all of them failed), it's purpose is to regulate where necessary. The reason why the banks could get away with what they did is because the governments (the US one, but also the governments of most other countries) failed to properly regulate the financial market. Of course, if a US president puts in a member of the banks as the one who should control them, then this is prone to fail. Governments (not only the US one!) should implement a proper, independent and strong authority to regulate the financial market, and this should include salary levels, bonusses and such. It should also have the power to impose sensible fines and requirements on those banks that don't follow.

As to temp workers, sorry but if you really believe that 60% of workforce in the companies you named consists of perms with high salary and 30 day of vacation then you're delusional. As German I happened to work in/with some of the companies you named (yes, in Germany), and two years ago the non-management workforce consisted of 70-80% temps, working for workforce providers which had 6months (production) to 12months (development) contracts for providing their service. Often the contracts were renewed, sometimes the provider was replaced with a cheaper one. The result was that the majority of the non-management staff had close to none job security, the fluctuation rate was very high, and the chances to be taken over into permanent employment was close to nil (in a 3 year period, out of 80 temps only two were taken over as perms). This was on other sites, onsuppliers, and even with competitors.

But lets talk about the "excellent" German healthcare system, provided by AOK, TK and other public healthcare providers, which every year provide less and less service for the money you pay them from your salary (of course private healthcare is available, but as it comes with a minimum salary requirement which is way above the average pay to prevent people from fleeing the public system you have to have a very good salary to be able to change to private health insurance). An "excellent" healthcare system where a simple box of Paracetamol tabletts, which can be bought in the UK for 19p in every supermarket, costs 3.70EUR in a pharmacy because they have the monopoly for selling drugs (including also the over the counter type of drugs which in other countries can be bought cheaply everywhere). A system where you pay for many medications yourself (or extra pay quite a bit more than the £7.50 you pay in the UK). Is your girlfriend/wife on the pill? If so, then the box of tablets (which btw is free in the UK) can easily cost between 20-35EUR in Germany. The extra charges you have to pay are constantly increasing. On the other side, especially with public health insurance, there is limited or even no access to many new diagnostics and treatment methods. Ever seen how prostate cancer is diagnosed in Germany? The procedure involves shooting (yes, shooting) two steel rods in your prostate through your bowel. Not only is this procedure extremely painful, it is also highly risky as it carries bacteria from your bowl into the prostate and other parts of the body, often causing infections. Also, this procedure comes with a high risk of resulting in incontinence and erectile disfunction. Most other countries use less butchery methods to diagnose prostate cancer, but not Germany, as this is still the standard method there.

You have to be very naive or live in a shell to believe the German health care system is "excellent". The only advantage over the UK system is that you often have access to specialists much quicker than in the UK, and the hygienic standard is generally (not always) a bit better (although the NHS has improved a lot in recent years).

As to my comment of BILD, I'm well aware that there are many other magazines available in Germany. However, BILD is the most read newspaper and it decides the public opinion, something which is used extensively by German politicians). Just have a look at the current attitude (I'd call it more a war against) jobless people and people requiring benefits (Hartz IV).

To cablegate: yes, it is embarassing (but I said that already), and the current reaction of the US government is riddiculous (I also said that already). However, it's hardly appropriate for Germany or UK (and many other countries) to hold their heads high. As I said, the US is quite good in keeping its real secrets secret. Those dealing with these real secrets (like the NSA) use a different system where access is much more stringently controlled. And this system usually works.

I agree that the US should get its issues sorted out (stop with the silly focus on terrorism, stop putting industry lobbyists into the government and other important positions, stop giving tax breaks to billionairs, and stop creating a mess in the world and in countries the US don't understand; start investing in education and infrastructure, start promoting entrepreneurship, start inviting the brightest and most talented as it used to be). And when we're at sorting things out, how about Germany stops pushing its own economy by exploiting other EU countries? After all, German export politics played a big part in the problems countries like Spain and Greece currently face.

Davidoff
Thumb Down

China and Germany

"Only the Germans and the Chinese (and a few other smaller economies) have a systemic respect for the complexity involved in and flexibility required in running a modern country."

Yes, indeed, by exploiting their own people. To follow Germanies example this would mean the US would have to focus on exports, push short-term contract work (job security my a**e) and maintain decreasing salary levels (which is one reason why they would have to focus on exports, because with low salaries there is not much spending in your country). Ok, the US wouldn't have to rip down their social systems as Germany did (and continues to do) as it already is at a very low standard. But I'm not sure this is the path for a sustainable economy, especially when considering that Germany has lost many of its highly qualified workforce to other countries.

And as to China, just have a look at the working conditions at companies like Foxconn and then think again if this is a path the US should really go.

One thing to remember is that just because a coountry does well doesn't mean that it's citizens benefit from it.

Page: