Re: Spy V Spy
I do and it was Mad.
249 publicly visible posts • joined 27 Jul 2010
I think you have hit the nail on the head with your last two sentences: "I mean, we still have a large majority of the population that believes that not working while able is intrinsically immoral, and that material wealth is a worthy goal in itself. As long as philosophies like that are prevalent, drudgery is here to stay."
The current prevalent society requires you to do some work (in whatever form) so you earn and can afford necessities, and if you earn enough, luxuries. Until that changes work will mean drudgery for some.
It's just a thought but if the Government was to promote FOSS within the Civil Service and Government organizations, why don't they encourage schools and collages to use and teach classes on FOSS office applications? They would make a saving in license costs, while turning out a steady stream of people who could use alternative M365 software.
I'm appalled at the Governments championing of AI and trying to fit it into every service as a solution (the Microsoft approach?). The technology just doesn't seem stable or ready for production use as a general tool. Yes, there has been achievements where its been used for a very specific use with a limited scope, but not as a general purpose tool. See https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-ai-was-fed-sloppy-code-it-turned-into-something-evil-20250813/
Even if it did work, AI would struggle to fix the issues caused by disjointed IT systems used by Government departments and quangos that were implemented as point solutions to requirements that have subsequently changed.
I'm having trouble with this analogy "The whole concept is a bit like predictive text on a modern smartphone. As you type, it tries to guess what you're going to say next. When it's right, you can complete the sentence with a single tap; when it's wrong, you just type it out yourself."
I know what the answer should be with predictive text because of prior knowledge. How does the LLM know that the predicted tokens are right or wrong? Does it have prior knowledge?
The approach they are taking is to send the rocket (Earth Return Orbiter) to be used for returning the samples to Earth to a martian orbit (it won't land on Mars). It won't need to be as powerful or need as much fuel as a rocket that has to land and take off from Mars before journying back to Earth.
This statement "the number of charge–discharge cycles that occur before breakdown" got me thinking. Are manufacturers building circuit boards with components that they know are going to fail?
Whats the limit for charge–discharge cycles before breakdown occures and is the breakdown catastrophic?
I didn't play Elite at the time of its release as I didn't have a compatible computer. Many years later I discovered Oolite which is a modern take on Elite. Over the years it has been expanded and refined. It even includes the facility for people to define missions - tasks which have to be completed in usually very specific ways. I still play it occasionally. Have a look: https://oolite.space/
It's fascinating reading the comments but its clear people don't have any idea how complicated air traffic control is or how it works. With long distance flights that terminate or cross UK airspace, the flight plans are passed to NATS 4 hours before the aircraft enters UK airspace. So the plane may well be in the air by the time NATS gets the flight plan. The flight plans are submitted to a local or regional organisation who does some validity checks before routing it to the authorities who manage the airspace the flight crosses. These organisations will have different systems so there may be a lot of data translation involved. The software module that crashed validates the flight plan and adds UK specific information to it for the air traffic controllers before passing it to the next system. That it caught the error is good but that it failed in the way it did was not so good. In the bigger picture, things failed safely.
For an even more embarrassing episode concerning NATS and software not behaving as expected, read the report of the 12th December 2014 air traffic fiasco.
You have hit the nail on the head in that the problem is nobody is legally accountable for security lapses. Until that is fixed there is very little incentive to invest in effective information security.
Introducing accountability for security may have unintended consequences but it is badly needed.
I switched from Virgin Media to BT as I was out of contract and the BT deal was cheaper than any of the deals Virgin Media offered me. Choice from VM was limited as I was not a new customer. When I pointed out that the deal they were pushing was more expensive than the one I had been on and the rival package, they said it was the best they could do. Apart from the hassle of talking to the sales bods switching was relativity straight forward. They did ring me about a month after I had left them to offer me a new deal. Talk about desperate measures!
Another thing I hated about Virgin Media was their Customer portal. It was clunky and hard to navigate once you had logged in. The UI seemed to gave been designed in the last century. And don't even think about IPv6 as they have never heard of it.
While I agree that the vast majority of the Open Source community are striving for the common good, security is not necessarily their main objective. How do you know the firmware you have just downloaded is free of anything to create a bit of mischief?
The SolarWinds incident showed what can happen when someone broke the weakest link in a supply chain.
Those were the days! I was a VMS specialist from v3 through to v6 and even worked for DEC for the majority of that time. Writing a file archiving system in Bliss 32 was probably the peak moment. In some ways VMS spoilt me as the DCL command language was consistent and intuitive. Want to print the file Myfile.txt? try $ Print Myfile.txt I even wrote an application in DCL for a client.
Whenever I dip my toes into the Linux terminal it always seems to be just a mess. Non-intuitive commands and each one has its own non-standard switches and options.
While I have a soft spot and high regard for VMS, I can't think of a single application I use that would run on it.
There's so many things wrong with this post. All metals are traded (including gold, silver and copper). The price of them will fluctuate depending on demand and supply. Even when it was used as a backing for a currency, the gold standard was a volatile monetary system.
This is just sensationalism and widely distorting the truth. The various trusts didn't actually pay any money for the shares. They provided data and in return were given some shares which are now pretty much worthless. THEY HAVE NOT LOST ANY MONEY. You could summarize it as they were tricked into giving away data for free but even that's a distortion of the facts.
One of the things that gets overlooked is the availability of the skill set(s) required to support the end users. With a Microsoft environment there's a ready supply of skilled people mostly due to its sheer market dominance. With a Linux environment the choices of distributions, desktops and applications which will do what the the company wants, ensures that the chosen solution will likely require a rare and possibly unique skill set to support. There won't be many suitably skilled people around to staff up the support team.
An old PC I had failed (motherboard failure). I tried to move the hard drive to another box I had but Windows wouldn't entertain that. That gave me the opportunity to stuff in some spare hard drives and an SSD and install Linux Mint. Perhaps I should mention that at that time I had no prior experience of installing any type of Linux,
My mistake was wanting to use the hard drives in a particular way (SSD for system, medium sized HD for Home and the big HD for general stuff). It took an awful lot of googling and multiple installs to get it how I wanted. Quite a steep learning curve if you want something different to a default install.
While I cursed a lot during the build I've grown to like Linux Mint with the Cinnamon desktop. It's similar enough to Windows so I can just get on and do the stuff I want to do. I will be moving more systems over to Linux as they don't have the hardware spec for Windows 11 put are perfectly good PC's.
With no prior Linux experience, I built a Linux Mint system last year for a project. The experience was "interesting", but I got there in the end.
If Microsoft get rid of local accounts then I'm afraid that might be the final straw and the three windows machines used every day will be going Minty too.
Having to contend with "parked" delivery vans from Asda and Ocado as they deliver their orders is a daily challenge here. They just seem to stop as close to the target address as they can ignoring any no parking restrictions and/or blocking access roads, driveways etc.. How are they going to teach robots to do that?
Developing a DP regime that substantially differs from GDPR will add additional and unnecessary costs to the businesses and organisations that have to comply with its requirements.
I can't see what the attraction is, except to monetarize and share the data subjects personal data without their knowledge or consent (that's the "innovation" bit).
I have a laptop and a desk top that quite happily run Windows 10 and are fine for what they are used for. However, they don't meet the requirements for Windows 11. Assuming they continue to run and have the performance needed, I will be moving them to Linux Mint when W10 goes EOL.
I expect this (Linux) will be the fate for many W10 boxes which is probably a good thing. Why throw away a perfectly good computer?