
Actually, its the reverse. Microsoft is trying to shoehorn a mobile interface onto the desktop. Users of Mountain Lion have complained that Apple is trying to "iOS" OS X. The GNU Project have made a similar mess of GNOME 3.
5 publicly visible posts • joined 20 Jul 2010
Facebook do not have total ownership of anything you upload. Read their T&Cs!
For content that is covered by intellectual property rights, like photos and videos (IP content), you specifically give us the following permission, subject to your privacy and application settings: you grant us a non-exclusive, transferable, sub-licensable, royalty-free, worldwide license to use any IP content that you post on or in connection with Facebook (IP License).
Ditto with Twitter...
You retain your rights to any Content you submit, post or display on or through the Services. By submitting, posting or displaying Content on or through the Services, you grant us a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free license (with the right to sublicense) to use, copy, reproduce, process, adapt, modify, publish, transmit, display and distribute such Content in any and all media or distribution methods (now known or later developed).
Exactly. Or at a mundane level, by their logic you could say that purchasing a car is proof that you intend to use it as a getaway vehicle. If this is the quality of RIANZ's legal argument, they need to get themselves a new legal team and fast, as even the most inexperienced of barristers should be able to tear that one apart.