Won't work
From the article
In March, research showed the number of Hubble images photobombed in this way nearly doubled from the 2002-2005 period to the 2018-2021 timeframe, for example.
as these even stuff Hubble
699 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Jul 2010
Then again its my car and my battery which I payedpaid for.
Here in Australia if you enter into an agreement with your power company to use either your house battery or car battery as a grid connected battery they (the power company) will pay you good money. You can set the limits that they can draw down to. The power company will also charge the battery for you (at a cheap rate) when they have surplus power. Your battery allows the power company to balance out usage.
If you have just a house battery or use your car as a house battery then the power companies can't touch it.
the point is working at the same place as the others, so you can talk to them face to face
I hate that, I am much more productive being left to actually code. Having some idiot wandering around and talking to me completely stuffs my productivity!
For those that actually need a question answered, this means that actually need to think about the question and write it out in an email. In the process they may find they have an answer. It also means you have an audit trail of question and answer.
Run fibre... (please note spelling, commonwealth English), Yea, right! Try using this solution in the middle of the Australian outback or the middle of the ocean.
Terrestrial radio doesn't work. To get the distances (1,000-5,000km) you require you would need to use HF frequencies and these are dependant on skip and time of day. And there is no way you can get any sort of bandwidth in the HF band, it is ONLY 30mhz wide.
German has two sorting orders:
Interesting where I was brought up in New Zealand the local city Dunedin had a very large Scottish population so in the local telephone book "Mac" and "Mc" were sorted together. Problem was I had a friend with the family name "Machin" which I think was German and he got slotted in with the Mac/Mc mob.
If the monitor it was still powered on, if the cable wasn't disconnected or broken.
In the early days I saw it all. People would move the computer to a different desk and just disconnect the cable. In once case with coax ethernet they added a 5m dropper, we ended up using an oscilloscope to see the echo reflecting back up the dropper, sh*t.
At least now with twisted pair you (mostly) just stuff yourself up.
Each time they have had to engage additional workers to replace me
I was brought on in a company that had been bought by an Indian company that was going to move it to India. However once they tried to get everything up and running they found they just didn't have the skill set. So they keep bits of the old company in Australia and used locals to fill the gaps. Ha Ha
I suspect that you would have used Windows devices.
Mix, the tills were windoz the back end paired store servers were AIX boxes with mirrored databases. Cloud is still a risk if you can't access the cloud, little things like a backhoe cutting the fibre cable.
In a few years the "industry-standard software applications" and user management will all be in the cloud allowing us to use any operating system/desktop as long as it has a supported browser.
Yep, no cloud access from one of several faults means a nice single point of failure. In my long life I've seen this happen too many times. A major retail store that I was involved in actually got to the stage that each till (PC with scanner and draw attached) could standalone. Backed up by the whole shop being able to standalone.
If they're going to pull water from the (relatively) dry atmosphere rather than take what little groundwater there is there to support the locals, won't that affect how much water ends up in the ground for those locals?
The problem is that it is a desert, there is no ground water! The locals rely on bore water which is high in mineral content and comes from rain that fell years ago and in a different place.
The BIG issue with that is you would need to change ALL the calls in the legacy code and then carry out a extremely comprehensive test.
This of course will take a lot of time and money. In a commercial world who will be paying for that! Better to just keep the old code in place doing its job and only, only replace / rewrite when you have to.
Refactoring old code to remove all the dangerous calls to things like memset, memcpy, memcmp, strcpy, strcmp etc will normally end up in a complete rewrite as the old legacy code will have had the boot prints of multiple developers over the years it has been in production. Some of those developers have been good and others well...
Some of the stuff I've worked on has been over 30 years old and has been so bodged and patched that most of the job is just trying to work out what the code does. In some cases there have been bits of code that have been logically commented out because they provided a function that is no longer needed.
This problem is not specific to any language one of the worst legacy systems I was involved with was written in COBOL.
One rule I found useful is "If it is not broken don't fix it!"
"A programming language designer should be responsible for the mistakes made by programmers using the language."
Seriously! Humans have an amazing ability for stupidity. To paraphrase Einstien "the universe is finite, human stupidity is infinite"
The phrases I love hearing are:
"Well it appeared to be a good idea at the time"
"Whoa did not see that coming"
"No one would ever do that/ be that stupid"
"This is only a quick and dirty fix it doesn't need to go into production..."
One of the major reasons is legacy code. I was involved in the maintenance of a very large retail system that had its roots in MS-DOS.
There were still large parts that used strcpy strcmp etc. No one wanted to refactor those as they worked. However we did have warnings maxed with warnings as errors and just added a define around each call to hide that specific warning.
The other rule was if you had to make any changes in that area which meant it would be tested you were to change the strcpy/strcmp etc. The preferred fix was to replace the char * with a std::string or CString.
You will require considerably less concrete for a window farm and there is no waste to entomb and hide away somewhere safe for 10,000 years.
The issue is you can't recycle a nuclear reactor as the material is contaminated and must be entombed. At least with a window farm it can all be recycled.
£250k
Not sure where you get your costings from. But here in australia most installations ate about 6-10kw at about $6k so 30kw of cells would be about $30k and batteries are a similar cost per kw. so for a 30kw system (which BTW is extremely massive) would cost about $60k AUD about £35k.
Also not sure why you would need 30kw as here in aus most installation are around 6kw