"Victoria is the first stop"
First victim, more like.
They used to say that if you had nothing to hide you had nothing to fear. Now, you just need to have a face.
2448 publicly visible posts • joined 3 Jul 2010
Musk is openly fascist, racist and transphobic, and it's known that he begged for an invitation to the "special parties" on Epstein's island so he can be presumed to be a pedophile as well. I'm not sure why I would need him to have actually done something to me personally before I'm allowed to despise him.
AOL to that. It really annoys me that you can't actually drink some of the contents in front of them to demonstrate that it's safe.
Still, not as bad as Paris CDG was 20 years ago. They had a soft drink vending machine in direct line of sight of the security gate and you still couldn't get through with a bottle from it, even though they'd watched you purchase it and they'd personally given it to you.
There are a great many things that it is OK for the authorities to do but not OK for anyone else to do, and in a lot of those cases you will - and should - be arrested if you try to do them without proper authority.
That's not to say the authorities don't frequently overstep reasonable bounds when they decide it's OK for them to do something, of course. If you're unhappy with the panopticon on the streets, you'll hear no argument from me. But generally speaking, there aren't many actions that aren't OK for the authorities to do but are OK for a business to do.
Some of whom are Democrats.
I've said it before, I'll say it again: centrists always side with fascists because if a socialist ever gets to enact positive change, people are going to start asking why they should ever vote for the status quo. We're seeing this right now in the US. The other day establishment Democrat Haley Stevens debated her democratic socialist opponent Abdul al-Sayed. Fully 95% of respondents thought that al-Sayed had won the debate. You cannot speak for the people if you do not stand for the people.
While I don't disagree with their point, I feel like lead would be a better analogy for AI. Lead is used for far more applications than asbestos and far more commonly, most notably as an additive in paint where it was used for the sake of speed; it accelerates the drying process. It continued to be used for far longer after its toxicity was known. And like AI, there's a causal link between exposure to lead and cognitive issues.
Which raises an interesting possibility: it makes a business case for forced disclosure of said information before using the product. So LLM operators will no longer be able to deny that they've been stealing data - or if they do, you'll have to assume that their product is untrustworthy and unreliable.
The experiment is being conducted in America, so NASA can easily simulate those conditions by accepting only black applicants. This will also have the side benefit of guaranteed continued funding from the present administration.
"What do you need this $10 million for, Director?"
"We're going to lock up some black people for a year."
"Let's make that $20 million, shall we?"
Has someone pointed out to them that 99.9% of the universe is empty? You can't go around saying these ten billion billion experiments a second aren't destructive and dangerous when there's huge bloomin' holes all over the place and nobody was around to say how they got there!
Midjourney: We've developed a new AI technology that can perfectly render 3D scans of the human body!
Motherfuckers, your "AI" can't even consistently get the right number of fingers on a hand. How can we be expected to believe that you can produce medically accurate diagrams?
If you're in the UK and not simply submitting a picture of Keith Starmer for your age verification, particularly should you be signing up for AsianAnalAmateurs dot com [1], you're doing it wrong.
[1] Disclaimer: if this site really exists, I am unaware of it. I just pulled a dubious-sounding name out of my ass to use as a humorous example [2].
[2] No, I'm not Asian.
The precise details of the reason for Edwards' resignation obviously won't be disclosed while the investigation is ongoing. But they also may not be disclosed afterwards, as it may be possible to directly identify the individual affected by his conduct. That's not in the public interest, or in the interest of the person so affected.
From what has been said, though, it's most likely that he made a remark that was either racist, sexist or ableist.
We're already seeing companies cut back on AI use because it's more expensive than employing someone. And the costs haven't even begun to spike yet. Foolish for a government to follow the Judas goat into the slaughterhouse when they can see it already leaving alone.
I'm tempted to apply for this job myself, to push it towards "AI last and preferably never". But I know I wouldn't get it, because my tongue would turn black and fall out if I said the things I would need to say.
If you wanted your function to be improved when it was already working perfectly, then logically, your actual intent must have been for the function to not work perfectly. Fable, not understanding that this was a test to see if it could not find an error when no error was present, gave you exactly what it determined you had asked for.
When a pervert exposes himself in a children's playground, you don't close the playground to children. You arrest the pervert.
This policy is an excuse to police the people while ignoring the companies responsible for the damage.
Not entirely sure why people are voting down for this one. AMFM is saying - intentionally or otherwise - that it's more realistic that Karp wants to find someone who is more hated than himself or Palantir than it is that he's able to logically conclude he's succeeded in doing so. This is not a statement I can easily dispute, both because it's very hard to imagine how even the most self-deluding person could believe anyone was more hated than Palantir and because the original statement includes a presumption that a neo-Nazi had a thought.