
Re: Hamster wheels?
Yes, but it took O'Brien *months* to get Winston to that point.
74 publicly visible posts • joined 1 Jul 2010
The position in the US is one thing - the position elsewhere is quite another. For example, section 9(3) of the UK's Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 provides:
"In the case of a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work which is computer-generated, the author shall be taken to be the person by whom the arrangements necessary for the creation of the work are undertaken."
Under s9(3), Copyright, Designs & Patents Act 1988:
"In the case of a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work which is computer-generated, the author shall be taken to be the person by whom the arrangements necessary for the creation of the work are undertaken."
In the UK, Magna Carta is subject to amendment and/or repeal by Acts of Parliament like any other law. As such, today, only four clauses remain in force: 1 (part of), 13, 39 and 40. The rest still looks very pretty on the parchment but has precisely zero legal effect.
It's a historical thing. When Labor (the party) was founded in Australia, the US was seen as a beacon of progress and social democratic values (as opposed to frumpy, conservative old Britain). The American spelling was adopted as shiny and modern accordingly (1912). Well that worked out just dandy, didn't it?
Just for the record (and not that it really matters now), the statement you supplied was a statement of the Government's *political intent*. Original poster was right that the referendum was *not legally binding* - I refer you to the following sources among others:
House of Commons Library Briefing Paper, No 07212, 3 June 2015 (ed Uberoi, E), p25
Hansard, House of Lords, Second Reading (Continued), Lord Norton of Louth, 13 Oct 2015 : Column 147 (see also reply of Lord Higgins following).
So, while it would have been political suicide not to proceed with Brexit, there was no binding legal requirement to do it.
Steve Jobs made everything look new and exciting, even if it was just more of the same (e.g. bought-in technology like the original iPod).
Whereas...
Tim Cook makes everything look like more of the same, even if it is new and exciting (e.g. umm ... can't think of anything right now ... ).
Here's the harmonisation problem in a nutshell...
a) Although people talk a lot about the split between copyright and author's right, the real problem for harmonisation is inside the author's right system.
b) Some countries (France and those following) have a 'dualist' system - this splits economic (property) rights in works, etc. from moral (personal) rights that relate to works (i.e. the right to be identified as author, etc.).
c) Other countries (Germany and those following) have a 'monist' tradition - this fuses the property and personal rights, thereby creating deep differences from both copyright *and* dualist author's right - for example, under German law, outright assignment (transfer of title) of rights in a work is not possible. It makes life very difficult from an economic perspective and is cumbersome from a practical business perspective (kudlgy workarounds with publishing contract terms - some mandated by law - exist).
d) Since there is no way of 'squaring the circle', one of these models will have to be abandoned for harmonisation to occur. On economic/business grounds, it should be the monist system but can you really imagine Germany giving up on a tradition as hallowed in legal terms as the 'Beer Laws' in food terms? But, equally, can you imagine the French or the British giving up on their traditions?
@AC (Pi a maths symbol, hard to trademark that)
Not necessarily.
When seeking to register trademarks (trade-marks (Can.), trade marks (UK, Aus., NZ)), the basic question is whether the mark is distinctive (a threshold test including being 'not descriptive') in relation to the goods/services* for which that trademark is applied for (and not just distinctive per se).
:.
BICYCLE would be 100% descriptive of bicycles, so 'no go' there.
But ...
BICYCLE would be distinctive for medical services (so we would then move on to whether anybody else was using/had registered it).
[*Strictly speaking, US law distinguishes between trademarks for goods and service marks for services but the substantive differences are not great.]
Because third time lucky.
And besides, I like the old interface right down to its little raised and skeuomorphic buttons. Sigh ...
BTW, while I'm at it ... the skeuomorphic thing was always horsefeathers because of another Greek word - autopoesis (things taking on a UI 'life of their' own, in this context). See, it didn't actually matter that the kids didn't know, for example, what a floppy disk was, because, through exposure, they did know what the save icon was.
Ah well. Sad, flat modernity beckons.
I'm sure that it was torched.
One time I drove through Leicester (on the Fosse Way, previously an Iron Age trackway) and the thing that astonished me was a crowd of teenagers standing on top of a car in a park while chanting and pointing at another car they had set on fire.
So, clearly, the ritual has survived in Leicester folk memory.
Mission PCM4000 CD player (1987) (this cost me GBP399 as a first year Uni student and I am determined to get my money's worth)
Denon DRM-10 tape deck (1990)
Creek 4040S2 amp (1994)
Mordaunt-Short MS10 speakers (1999)
"Birdnest" including Telstra T-Box, Pioneer Blu Ray, Digitech A/v transmitter which also has 2(!!) HDMI inputs
Sony SMNICBR* TV 42" (2012)
Small Palsonic SMNICBR* TV in bedroom (A/v receiver attached)
*stupid model number I can't begin to remember
All in glorious STEREO thanks to RCA analogue connections as needed.
Sadly, the CD player may have to be retired in a year or so (Blu-Ray player doing double duty thereafter) as L channel getting a bit iffy. However, this would mean entering the 'bird nest'.
Also getting harder to find chrome/metal tapes for the Denon...
@Pat Volk
Please ignore the 'Little Englanders' on spellings (and on most other things).
While it pains me to say it, the US spellings without the Frenchification are correct - Noah Webster (your original dictionary guy) stuck firmly to the basics.
Meanwhile, Dr Samuel Johnson (our original dictionary guy), great brainbox though he was, was a glutton for Frenchification and stuck in many of the surplus letters that we now see (e.g. 'color' was quite acceptable in British English until Johnson messed it up, 'ax' without the silent 'e' was also fine, etc., etc., etc.).
Also, while I think of it, the US has 'pants' correct - as an abbreviation of 'pantaloons', the reference is properly to outer leggings. The current British usage of 'pants' for undergarments (derived wholly improperly in this context from 'underpants') is a vile neologism to be roundly and robustly deprecated at all times.
Tokens seem like a good idea until you get the new HSBC calculator-style one for Australia.
Step 1) Turn on device with (stupid finger breaking) key press combination
Step 2) Enter PIN to activate device (!!!)
Step 3) Enter last eight digits of your account number (!!!)
If suitably annoyed, add:
Step 4) Run over device repeatedly with car before closing account.
Too true, Steve Davies 3. I used MS-DOS from v2 onwards, Windows from v3.00 onwards. By the need of it all, had set up everybody who wanted help from me with "all-MS" solutions. Then trialled Windows 8 and pretty promptly switched to OS X for desktop use (also allowing easier connection to iThings) and FreeBSD server-side. I will suggest the same to the others as Windows 7 and Server 2008 R2 walk towards the Elephant's Graveyard. I am not likely to be coming back to Redmond for an OS any time soon (though I do still use MS Office on Mac so they got me there).