Re: Heard Lewis on BBC R4 this morning
Don't believe everything Lewis writes, Tim. most of it is total bollocks.
7 publicly visible posts • joined 29 Jun 2010
Lewis stated - "The primary reason for purchasing a Type 45 is to obtain Sea Viper (aka the Principal Anti Air Missile System, PAAMS), which accounts for most of its cost."
Oh my!
Erm, I think you'll find that the SAMPSON radar accounts for most of the ships cost. Lewis.
And how is the SAMPSON radar Franco-British-Italian equipment? It' is not. The French- Italian system is EMPAR, a far cheaper and inferior system.
I can't tell if you're deliberately misleading people or just pushing your anti Type 45 agenda?
You'd be wrong about the Russian navy(largely useless). China and India are having great difficulty manufacturing nuclear submarines(China has them but there is considerable doubt on their effectiveness) .
Besides, numbers are irrelevant for the most part. At no extra cost, the RN could do double in size and be half as effective.
Why are the missiles referred to as French when BAE is the largest shareholder (37.5%) of MBDA? Surely that makes them British as much as French, no?
Also, if the Astute submarines already have block IV tomahawk, why put them on an expensive AWD platform like the Type 45. It's not like the RN is going to use 'shock and awe' on anyone. Furthermore, fitting an anti-ship missile isn't a huge undertaking and will probably occur at some future point.