Enough to sell?
Apple always have enough to sell, they just don't deliver enough to their stores. Increasing the perceived cachet of the latest iDevice by going "hey look, it's sold out!" is a damned shady marketing practice.
104 publicly visible posts • joined 30 May 2007
So let me get this straight, it's cheaply built, has an annoying UI (asking for conformation when you tell it to change channel? Sounds like a deal-breaker to me) and costs £900?! That sounds like a lot of wedge for a 37", and then when you've given them the best part of a grand for a TV they have the temerity to display adverts in the UI as well? What happened Panasonic, you used to be good.
I've been looking forward to WinMo 7 for quite some time - I love the UI on my Zune HD and it'd be really interesting to see how they've integrated it into a phone, but it looks like I'll be jumping ship to Android from my old WM6-powered HTC Diamond. Why?
Apps.
Put simply, there's more software out there for Android (and loads more for iOS, natch). Expecting developers to start creating stuff for WP7 is a little optimistic if you ask me - the tools are there, and they're good, but I just get the feeling that there won't be that much coming out for it.
50%, seriously? You spend the entire review trashing the damn thing then give it as much as that? I was expecting to see something about 20% less, especially when you have to hand over 200 notes to get one!
Even more so when I see Next are selling an Android-powered (Android Kindle app is free, remember) tablet for £20 less, with a proper touchscreen as well.
Reminds me of Microsoft's (sadly) stillborn Courier. If it comes off anything like that would've, it deserves to be a huge success. Sadly, with Win7 standard on it, it seems unlikely. A custom UI based on Windows Embedded CE like the Zune's or Courier's would be a better bet IMHO.
This may sound strange, but I'm sure I read once that HTC (that other big Chinese smartphone manufacturer with a penchant for Android) stood for Huawei Technology Company. This phone sure reminds me of the old HTC touch, too. Am I just imagining things or is this a cheaper sideline from HTC?
Seriously, a thousand pounds for a laptop and they don't even give you a blu-ray drive or a decent screen? Come on, guys. Even my ancient 15" Acer Travelmate 8100 can get 1680x1050, on a considerably smaller screen - with that much processing and graphics grunt, you'd think Dell would have assumed we might like to view HD content on it, especially for the kind of money they're asking.
...and it was pants. All these desktop replacements seeking to "change the way we use computers" seem to do is slow down the experience with needless faffing. It's like all the early 90s sci-fi movies showing how we'd be using virtual reality to surf the web, flying from one place to another by going throug everything inbetween our curent location and that one - rather than the current, not confusing, method of typing an address and having it load near instantly.
So by pulsing an LED at high speed, you could get 100Mbit+ data rates? Wow, that's great. Hey, how about taking advantage of a laser's ability to pulse really quickly to get it even faster?! Even better, if you could put it through an optical fibre you wouldn't even need line of sight!
Wait, isn't that Ethernet over fibre? Like we've had for years?
A 12" screen and £399? I think we're stretching the definition of "netbook" here a little. 12 months ago this would have been called an ultra-portable laptop, especially since it's £50 more expensive than the basic Dell 15" laptop model. Netbook to me says cheap and tiny, not average-price and slightly smaller than normal.
I never can quite understand why El Reg keeps going on about having one's "identity card" incorporated into one's phone - Most of us here are techies, we tend to change mobile a lot . Can you imagine the hassle in porting all of your personal data from one handset to the other? Hell, can you imagine SonyEricsson, LG, Samsung, HTC et al even sitting down to discuss a standard for interoperability, let alone with gov.uk and the people desigining the "other end" of the system?
And from another point of view, I'd rather not have it so that the local chav population doesn't get all my personal details, bank account, drivers licence and so on just because one of them chinned me and ran off with my mobile...
Music artists typically get 1% of record sales.
So who is the thief then?
The guy who downloads their music without paying for it. I'm sick and tired of idiots going on about how the record industry rips off artists so therefore they can pirate all the music they want.
So yes, the amount they make per album sale is pretty terrible. Hey, guess what? You download it illegally, they get nothing. It's no excuse.
@AC - onboard flash isn't used for savegames, they're kept on the hard disk or memory card. My guess is that it's there because the new NXE Dashboard (the GUI, to you and me) is a lot larger than the old one, meaning that older boxes that have been updated to use it it's stored on the HDD rather than in flash - which slightly increases boot-up time.
"the RM machine matches the spec of the Asus-sold model exactly" - That's probably because it's the same machine. We bought some of the first RM miniBooks (Asus Eee PC 4G) and they're exactly the same as the Asus. RM seem to have abandoned their normal re-branding policy for laptops with these, as my miniBook has an Asus logo on the lid and came in an Asus box. The only RM branding anywhere was on the RM site and the receipt.
Normally in stuff like this i tend to end up on the anti-copyright side when it comes to piracy - the big record labels treat the bands like sh*t, the fans like sh*t and are only interested in money, but when it hits a small outfit like Dependent I have to say the pirates are dead wrong. This indie from Germany bought us the likes of Rotersand, Suicide Commando and Dismantled, who are all "niche" artists in a very small field, and it'll be a shame if they can't get a deal with another label, 'cause the majors sure as hell won't touch 'em.
@ Will Leamon - I really couldn't agree with you more. Even though I believe $220000 is absurdly excessive, the whole point of prosecution is to ake an example to deter others. Having her just hand over the cost of those 24 tracks would be stupid.
Even though I can't stand the RIAA's policies most of the time, I still come down on the side of the copyright holders over the woman trying to get something for nothing.