office
Banning Office would remove the best tool there is... the alternatives are NOWHERE NEAR as full-featured when you come to do complicated stuff. Granted much of the usage is for simple things but most of the cost is elsewhere.
6848 publicly visible posts • joined 28 May 2010
4Tb. 2000 files. 2Gb per file. Doable although a bit of a push... you can download HD movies on PS3 for something like 3-4Gb IIRC. Is American HD different to ours?
Maybe they just mean really short movies, not BraveHeart.
It doesn't matter what you think, it matters that your customers expect to find you on FaceBook. You should have a proper website too, but opting not to have a FB page if it could gain you business is something a moron who doesn't understand running a business would advise.
Restore what exactly? The issue isn't loss of data but loss of the page itself. It's like if someone steals your company domain... you can buy another domain and restore from backup, but all your SEO expenditure and so on is not backed up.
Similarly you can create a new FB Page but your user-base is still on the old page.
Scientists don't stand to make $$$ either way. I don't think that was claimed. But they stand to attract funding if they toe the right line.
Politicians use CO2 as part of their election plans.
Governments shape industry by subsidising green programs like electric cars and solar panels and wind farms.
Oil companies can sell oil as fast as they can mine it regardless, and personally I think we should be pushing to reduce oil use regardless because it is a finite resource.
It doesn't matter how much you shout and scream about bad service, and how right you are... if a company is deluged in 1000X complaints and customer service calls, they are not going to be able to respond promptly. Regardless that it's their mistake, what _exactly_ do you expect them to do about it but struggle to fix it as quickly as they can?
Such a brilliant game. I spent years waiting for a sequel and then SW was rubbish. I would so love a proper remake using proper 3D.
My personal favourites included:
- trying to get 200 people into a car
- trying to run over 200 people in a car
- a weird bug which let your ghost take control of a vehicle
- Gauss gun!!!!!
"If you don't like it, don't do it. There are plenty of good programmers out there who are fine with developing for the HTML5/CSS/JS platform"
What a great piece of critical thinking. People will get good at using a bad tool, if it's their only option, therefore it's not a problem.
The word "tool" seems highly appropriate to your post.
Linux weirdos have hated Windows for ages. Linux is still an OS for weirdos, as far as the PC goes. Apple is still a minority OS, propped up by their hardware. Inevitably iPhone will become replaced by something else cool and Apple will implode to a remnant... all this web stuff might or might not kill MS but Apple are screwed the moment iPhone isn't #1 phone.
It's cute to read the suggestions of doe-eyed innocents that the NHS should "just drop MS" (sorry, M$). It's also a little sad to think how those fresh-faced, enthusiastic kids will realise their naivety as they enter the world of work.
I doubt even most software people (myself included) can grasp the true size of the work that it would be to transition, and the enormity and complexity of the NHS.
The vast majority of IT types are not anti-Google or even anti-Facebook. Just the vast majority of those who bother to write a comment every time a story related to either is written.
If you make assumptions about IT demographics based on Reg comments, the majority of IT people use Linux and Scroogle. They don't. Even most programmers are on Windows.
In theory, IE could implement WebGL on top of Direct3D I should think. However, a more abstracted 3D API for the browser might be better i.e not GL or D3D, so that each browser can implement it using any tech they want depending on platform. Or maybe WebGL already is that, and the 'GL' in WebGL is about as relevant as the 'Java' in Javascript?