Twitter has been been down the toilet for a long time swirling in shit. Now Musk has pulled the chain. How dare Apple not want to jump in after Twitter.
258 publicly visible posts • joined 26 May 2010
That is certainly not the case in English law. Doing something that had previously failed again to a new group of gullible (and, it has to be said, deserving) investors but misrepresenting it at safe (and most of us probably know how flawed the whole idea of stablecoins is) is at least reckless but more likely knowingly dishonest. It's pretty clear from the facts which this was.
Establishing these facts would generally be sufficient in an English court. I am not familiar with Singaporean law but I do know that the Singaporean legal system and law is very much based on English law so it's unlikely to be fundamentally different.
Not all roles are easy to measure
It's absolutely true that lazy buggers are lazy buggers in the office just like they are at home. However, there are a lot of roles that are difficult to measure. If you can measure productivity by how many lines of code someone writes or how many customer calls they field, great.
A lot of roles (probably most) have both qualitative and quantitative elements. If my team has a good throughput of tasks but pisses everyone off in the process, that's partly easy to manage and partly difficult. If they are in the office, I can see how they deal with people. If they are at home, it takes a lot more of my time to assess that and I often end up having to wait until someone complains, by which time it's already too late.
Over a long period, say a year, it's easy to tell whether someone is doing a good job and there is a limit to how long someone can hide. Howefver, carrying someone for a year is bad for their colleagues and bad for their employer and it often takes that long to find out that someone is doing some parts of his/her job badly.
There are too many people in technology that hate people and the constant toddler whining about having to do their job where they get paid to do it got old two years ago. If you all want to go to work elsewhere, good. Most of the pointy heads on the Register couldn't manage their way out of a wet paper bag but are happy to shout about how people should do a job they aren't capable of doing themselves - that's why they aren't managers.
Management should be sensible and my team does balance its time between home and the office but it's total bollocks to suggest that all jobs can be done equally well remotely and that it's simple to measure productivity.
Re: Reheat the popcorn
It's not as simple as that.
There is no reason to believe that any of that money would have found a more beneficial home, depositors can go elsewhere, creditors have themselves to blame and most of these banks aren't financed by pension funds and other borrowers can and should go elsewhere.
Why should most of us care if Space X or Tesla for that matter go bust? I know I don't.
Nothing wrong with services
I pay for numerous services. I caught the train home from King’s Cross today. I didn’t get to keep a piece of the train or the track but I got to where I wanted. That seems like an entirely sensible arrangement to me.
Software can be a service and as long as the price is reasonable, I have no issue with that. There is no reason to be obsessed with ownership.
Re: Yes, I am ashamed of my country
Because America and Americans don't give a shit about the rights of women. There isn't even a constitutional guarantee of equal treatment for women. Unfortunately, this is reflected elsewhere but at least in civilised countries women's rights are guaranteed in law, even if this doesn't translate into reality.
It's a dark day for womens' right. I used to believe that progress might be slow but at least it would only go in one direction. The last 5 years have been disastrous for womens' right in the US and the UK.
I am constantly surprised to find how few people knew that such devices have been easily available for years - long before Airtags existed. You had to buy them on AliExpress rather than your local Apple shop but it's been easy to track people if you really wanted for years.
This is not Apple's fault.
Re: but most of their competitors are years ahead of Tesla
There are a lot of Teslas around where I live and I started to look at the panel gaps round the doors after I noticed a brand new Model 3 that looked like its door was sagging on its hinges.
Tesla panel gaps are absolutely terrible. 1970s British Leyland would have been ashamed to make cars like that. The Tesla charging network may be good but if I were to pay £70k + for a car, I'd expect something better than Trabant build quality.
it sounds like my background is similar in terms of experience to the author. I have been using Linux since kernel version 0.21 - before there was a desktop and therefore probably longer than the author. In all that time, I've seen article after article saying Linux is easy. It may be true now but 25 years of "Linux is easy" when it wasn't has put anyone who cares (which is not many people) off. Linux supporters are the boys who cried wolf and now, no-one will listen. The other big thing is software. No-one (or almost no-one) wants to dig around for a third rate alternative to the software they've grown used to.
Linux has shot its bolt and missed as far as the desktop goes. Linux has taken over the server world but non-techies are not interested in learning anything new and nor are they taught to use Linux at school (or work or home) so they won't. I am very familiar with it but I have given up mainly due to the lack of software support and now I'm Mac all the way (although I do still use Linux for specific tasks on a regular basis).
Linux may genuinely be easy now, but it's too late.
The impact of the failures with the Post Office systems were so severe with many innocent people being treated appallingly, being hounded by the Post Office for nothing and being wrongly branded as criminals. There is no way another contract should be awarded when the supplier consistently and wrongly said that there was no fault with the systems, even when they knew very well that there were.
It's an absolute disgrace.
I first encountered Cliff Stanford on the tenner a month Usenet group many years ago when Internet access wasn't a thing for private individuals. I got the 7th IP that Demon Internet issued (I still remember it even though I long since stopped using it) and it transformed my use of computers and was one of the factors that led to my pursuing a career in IT. I'm now the CISO at one of the UK's largest companies. Perhaps it would have happened without Cliff but I suspect it wouldn't.
I was sorry to read of the legal issues he had later on but thank you, Cliff and RIP.
Re: Automation Issue
Management doesn't get to decide what the cause of aviation accidents is and I have no idea why you think they might. What you say is completely untrue.
The FAA (which does get to decide what the cause was) states (here https://www.faa.gov/data_research/research/med_humanfacs/oamtechreports/2000s/media/200618.pdf) that 60-80% of commercial aviation accidents are the result of human error so there is some evidence. There is plenty more if you wish to look for it yourself.
Re: I get I'm in a microscopically small minority, but...
I absolutely hate it too. I was three months into a new job and it was going really well. I achieved three times as much in the first three months than the succeeding four and I can't wait to go back. I do not believe for a minute that people are as productive. That may be true for some people (typically those who tried to avoid human contact anyway) but very few. Added to which, many jobs simply cannot be done remotely. Try putting out a fire, caring for an elderly person or arresting rapists over Zoom.
Working from home is a great way to hide and measuring by results is difficult in many jobs and I do not think that the novelty will last. Anyone who values their career long-term will get back into the office as soon as reasonably possible.
I'm doing this to stop humans ripping off brilliant ideas by computers and aliens, says guy unsuccessfully filing patents 'invented' by his AI
Oh Hell. Remember the glory days of Demon Internet? Well, now would be a good time to pick a new email address
I was one of the initial group of people (number 7 if the allocated IP addresses were anything to go by) who had been following the tenner a month Usenet run by Cliff Stanford. I committed to spend the requisite tenner a month and got my first internet connection as part of the very first group. Prior to that I'd been using UUCP. It was a huge step forward for me and now I'm the CISO at an insurance company and I don't think my career would have progressed the way it did had it not been for my first internet connection provided by Demon.
RIP Demon internet, you were great.
Re: Anyone surprised ?
Not a single person lost a single penny as a result of the unauthorised disclosure. There were no losses.
If this had been an action in tort, there would have been no question of damages as there has been no loss. The DPA includes provisions for claiming for distress, which is the basis on which this claim is being made.
Unlike the ICO, I have read the legal submissions. She isn't missing anything.
Re: Time in chokey and a big fine
Again, this is factually and legally incorrect. See my comment above. Morrisons was found not to be at fault in the first trial and this verdict was neither appealed nor over-turned.
The finding of the first trial and appeal was that Morrisons was vicariously liable for the actions of its employee but was explicitly found not to be at fault.
This is legally and factually incorrect.
The first judgement (which I have read and you clearly have not read) made it absolutely clear that Morrisons had not breached its responsibilities under the Data Protection Act. In addition, the matter was fully investigated by the ICO which took no enforcement action nor required any remediation.
The issue is purely whether Morrisons is vicariously liable. Morrisons has been found not to be at fault and this verdict was not appealed.
Blockchain is the new PKI
I used to be a consultant at one of the Big 4 firms and one of my areas of specialism was asymmetric key cryptography, Public Key Infrastructures and Trusted Third Parties. It was a fascinating field. It was technically challenging, which I loved and there was a huge number of potential uses.
Fortunately, I went on to specialise in information security more generally because despite all the hype, PKI never took off in the way that many people (including me) hoped.
The issue with a lot of crypto technology is that the underlying principles are often elegant and reasonably easy to explain as long as you don't get into the maths. The same could not be said for the implementation. Cryptography is often extremely hard to implement in such a way as not to break anything. The implementation details mattered and in the long run, they were very often a major stumbling block when going from a simple POC to a full implementation.
Blockchain looks very similar to PKI from where I'm sitting.
Scumbag who phoned in a Call of Duty 'swatting' that ended in death pleads guilty to dozens of criminal charges
Re: Or maybe they just want to spy on the contents of your files
You may not but it is my job to want to know what's in our staff's files (or at least anything they share).
You surely must have heard of the Data Protection Act and the General Data Protection Regulation. Companies are required to implement "appropriate technical and organisational measures". Doing nothing is not an appropriate technical or organisational measure.
The files to which you refer are the property of the company, not the individual. As the person responsible for protecting data belonging to our customers and to our staff, I have every right - both legal and moral - to examine what people share and that is a right I exercise.
Re: Humm, did they forget about Cell phones??
I made sure when we introduced a similar policy that not only is all removable storage (which includes phones) banned from corporate devices, we installed a DLP agent on corporate laptops that blocks certain types of data being copied by any mechanism.
It's not foolproof but it would stop the vast majority of our staff doing anything I don't want them to do.
It's also worth pointing out that simply defeating the control is not sufficient to protect a malefactor. I have personal experience of several instances where controls were in place but were circumvented. In every case the culprit was identified as a result of a forensic investigation.
You have entirely missed the point.
No-one is suggesting that restricting the use of USB sticks will entirely mitigate the risk. I don't know where you work but setting up "a netcat transparent proxy" is something 99.9% of our staff would have no idea how to do. As long as the risk is limited to 0.1% of a company's staff, they have achieved a pretty impressive level of risk reduction.
Re: Trust your staff
I venture to suggest that you are not a CISO.
It's fine to say this in a business that employs 5 people. It makes no sense where I work - we employ well over 100,000 people. I know from personal experience that trusting everyone can backfire. I also know that the ICO does not regard simply trusting one's staff as "appropriate technical and organisational measures".
I am the CISO for a FTSE 100 company and we have had the same policy for more than two years.
If a technically competent person wants to steal data to which they are given any sort of access, they will likely succeed. However, implementing restrictions like this has two big benefits.
Firstly, it forces staff to use a more controllable and auditable approach to data transfer. When our staff share information on Google Drive, for example, they can retain a considerable degree of control over what is done with that data including revoking access and preventing further sharing. My team and also monitor transfers (including examining the content for personal information) and keep a forensic trail. This reduces the risk of mistakes and permits my team and me to examine the circumstances of mistakes.
Secondly, this limits the ability of less technically competent but malicious members of staff to harm our business.
Can I absolutely stop people stealing our data? Probably not. Can I reduce the risk that someone will do something stupid or malicious? I absolutely can and I have. The sky has not fallen in. In fact, no-one really cares.
Most of the time I've seen IT projects go spectacularly wrong (and I've seen a few in my time as a Big 4 consultant), they were big ones. I am no project manager but it appears to me that project difficulty grows exponentially with project size.
Government projects are usually big and have the additional drawback of being overseen by the Government.