The Cloud
It's times like this when having your documents saved "in the cloud" really pays - I mean, imagine if someone didn't use SkyDrive and only maintained local copies of their docs!
Oh, wait...
172 publicly visible posts • joined 30 May 2007
In other news, 98 people seriously need to find something significant to get upset about.
If your life is so easy that you have no problems to sort out besides complaining about a stylized cartoon of a famous dead guy - then I'm very jealous of you all.
If I'd spent my life uttering profundities and my image was still used 2000 years after my death, I'd be very chuffed indeed.
I expect Jesus feels the same and is now cursing those who got him removed from the Phones4U ad campaign.
I suspect you're a troll, but I'll say it anyway...
You might not be up to anything nefarious, but the same argument could be flip-reversed on the mobile operator: if THEY'RE really not going to do anything with my details, then why do THEY need them?
Whether or not you have "nothing to hide, nothing to fear" is not the point. They're MY details, I'll keep them close to my chest, thanks.
By the way, I have an interest in the phone number of those commentards whose comments I reply to. I assume you'll have no qualms about handing them over - after all, I can't do anything bad with just your phone number, right? Right?
I think I may be waiting a long time to get number...
So, it measures consumption for the whole house and you can't break it down by applicance?
I just got myself a plug-in meter for £20 (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Plug-In-Power-and-Energy-Monitor/dp/B000Q7PJGW) and it does the job much more accurately and usefully. (Not on comission here, btw.)
Not only does it let you see how much individual applicances use, it also measures the power factor (PF), VA, watts etc. so you can see the difference between what you're being billed for and what is "useful" energy, real/reactive power and all that geeky goodness.
Fair enough, you can't access it through the web or save stas after you switch off, but for £20 I'm not complaining!
For the same reason we see how fast we can make cars go, or how stealthily we can make aircraft fly.
In other words, it's human nature - curiosity, innovation and just plain old finding things out.
If we stopped pushing the limits of what can be done for fear of the bad guys misusing our work, we'd probably be a whole lot less "civilised" than we are today.
I'm sure they didn't invent it, but The Real Hustle (BBC3...) did the same thing on a safe a year or two back.
They posed as shopping mall security guards and got the shopkeeper to open their safe to "check" it hadn't been emptied.
Then as soon as he'd entered the PIN, called him away on some "urgent" matter.
The other chap then took an IR image of the keypad, before entering the glowing digits into the safe, brightest last.
I noticed this today, as it was addressed to the name of someone I booked on behalf of once, using a me@googlemail.com address. So it's not just the email address, but also the account holder name they've pilfered.
I also have another account with them using me@gmail.com but no email has been sent there (so far).
Google identified it as spam, so unless they've not shown me the 2nd mail then it could be that it's an 'old' dataset that got taken?
"Under the order, plantiffs obtained the name, address, email address, telephone number and geographical location of the users behind the five Twitter accounts."
No IP addresses mentioned there.
Even so, an IP address ties your username to *AN* ISP account.
-1 for not understanding how the internet works.
...I have to elaborate on that.
1st Pirates film: Ace, works as a stand-alone film
2nd Pirates film: Highly entertaining, but its existence serves as a plot bridge to the 3rd film
3rd Pirates film: Very clever resolution of intricate storylines, best action, effects and score of the three. Not as funny as the first, mind you. Watching 2nd + 3rd as if they are one film is highly recommended!
4th Pirates film: Going to see it this week, judgement reserved...
Saw Evan Davis talking about the fall of fashion retailer Boo.com last night on his Business Nightmares programme. Yes, it was over-inflated before having sold a thing or even launching, whereas LinkedIn is established, but the parallels are there.
I think they said that despite a worldwide launch and much hype they took 80 orders in the first day.
As a commenter asked in another story, how can I make money from knowing the value of tech shares are due to fall off a cliff?
That may very well be the case, but your comment history outs you as a Fanboi of the highest order. I will therefore be taking your anecdotal evidence of Apple's good service with a pinch of iSalt.
Reading between the lines, Apple sold you a dodgy iPhone that should never have passed the factory QC check and not even the battery in your laptop works properly. To me, that's "truly awful".
Hello Mr Terrorist,
We kaffirs all know about encryption so if you want my advice you should use lemon juice as invisible ink.
When your mate warms the paper in an oven it will show up your secret message. You should definitely do this because no one else uses it so it's more secure.
P.S. We also know about explosives so next time, use water bombs because we won't be expecting that and we'll be very afraid.
I received this lame apology from Play too. Really annoyed, because I'd kept my address 'clean' for years and now through no fault of my own it's going to get a ton of spam and I need to change passwords etc.
Interesting that you mention the GSN link because I got spam yesterday purporting to be *from* GSN (offering Acrobat X PDF Reader). I've never been to GSN.com in my life let alone signed up.
I haven't bought anything from Play in a couple of years now, but certainly won't be again after this!
So, "it operated as a legal 'discussion-only' forum where people could talk about their sexual interest in young boys without committing any offences"
Hmm, I'm pretty sure the same wouldn't be tolerated of a "legal 'discussion-only' forum where people could talk about their interest in planning terrorism without committing any offences"!
I feel I need to confess, because while I can't understand how anyone can be so dumb as to fall for these scams, I myself was once dumb too.
My first computer was an Amiga 500. I'd read in Amiga Power (or was it Amiga Format...) that a virus was going to be relased on a specific date. We didn't have a network connection.
To avoid my poor little Amiga 'catching' the virus, I didn't turn it on all day. Worked, though...
I don't believe the 1 in 4 statistic.
Let's say only half the UK are 'web users'. That's about 30 million, 1 in 4 of which have allegedly been cold called in an anti-virus scam.
In other words, they reckon 7.5 million people have answered the phone and it was a call about a fake AV. Even using autodiallers and professional outbound call centres, that's still going to require a lot of manpower and outlay.
While I'm sure the scam exists in many forms, I call shenanigans on the stats.