Posts by Electric Panda 225 publicly visible posts • joined 26 May 2010
I once read about a Kickstarter-funded game which ran into serious legal trouble when it was discovered a freelance artist had been using a Maya student (or similar trial) licence, which you are not allowed to profit from. Settling the legal matters was a five figure sum of money.
This kind of thing is potentially a major issue.
The other thing I've seen is "cloud migrations" where they just lift and shift on-prem into the cloud and ram it until it fits. No thoughts to redesign or rebuilding around cloud components or paradigms, just spin up a load of old school server instances.
That's probably not how it's supposed to be.
Mail shots going to large numbers of people (i.e. external customers) should really use something like MailChimp, or even some kind of Excel to Outlook merge. That means the e-mail only ever goes to one person at a time and you can't know who else has received it.
However this would be much less practical for internal corporate comms, in which cases internal training is key.
I remember being aghast and disappointed at how bad Unreal Tournament 3 was. UT2003 and 2004 were absolute legendary games, but UT3 was a disaster - it performed really badly and just wasn't fun.
Hence the franchise died, but the engine that bears its name lives on. I think the reason there isn't a brand new Unreal Tournament game these days is probably because of Fortnite, and the old UT formula seeming perhaps rather old fashioned these days.
Quite a lot of the time these "X in Y out" regimes are a mere fig leaf for the fact that there just isn't enough desk space to begin with.
In many cases it is simply a glorified hotdesk rotas, and I know of at least one organisation (a friend works there) where as a result you don't even get to choose which days are which. If your alotted days are Monday, Tuesday, Friday, then that's you. You are NOT allowed in on Wednesday and Thursday even if you want to, unless you find someone willing to swap.
Consider this.
They have both maintained near enough 100% uptime and have worked continuously, near enough flawlessly, while moving ever deeper into space at an incredibly high speed. They are still able to send highly detailed images back to Earth and receive commands and instructions near enough no problem at all.
Yet they were launched in the late 1970s. Rather primitive (relatively speaking) 1970s tech that is forever frozen in time, non-upgradeable, none of it can ever be patched or replaced. Yet it's still going. Some of the photos sent back in 1979 look like they could have been taken in 2009 because the quality is absolutely immense. It seems to have futureproofed itself absolutely beautifully.
Back when the original Voyager was launched, we were just days away from the Atari 2600 being released. Elvis Presley had barely been dead a month. The late Queen had only just celebrated her Silver Jubilee, and we hadn't yet had a female Prime Minister. We were blasting long distance probes into space, but the mountain bike hadn't yet been invented.
I know someone in the UK, in a major city, who has a 5Mbps internet connection. Not a typo.
It's absolutely insufferable and you can't really WFH or do anything terribly exciting. When staying at his place temporarily I had to tether 4G to get any work done.
To be honest I think it might actually be a fault, because surely that's just not normal in this day and age? I haven't had a home connection that slow since literally 2005 or thereabouts and didn't think such things existed anymore.
He's holding on for now because Hyperoptic have surveyed his building and CityFibre might be digging his road up soon too.
The US 911 system is a total patchwork It has never been a standardised system, it was rolled out piecemeal, and even as recently as the early-mid 1980s some areas still didn't have it. Add that every small half-horse town seems to have its own 911 dispatch infrastructure and you have a bit of a mess.
Mind you, the emergency services infrastructure in the US is totally different to ours. The fire departments out there are arguably more skilled and can do more jobs (they double up as paramedics, for example) and you don't need to tell the operator which service you require. In the UK you see people asked "what service do you require", they then rattle off details of the incident and the operator has to interrupt them. Don't know what service you require? That's a problem - the rule of thumb then is to contact the police and let them coordinate, but not many people know that.
It was suggested immediately after the 999 outage that the UK looks to adopt a 911-style system. I half agree.
I knew someone who got a 'smart' gas meter. It somehow started counting from zero rather than the previous month's reading - they were hit with a bill for £4200. Nobody at the gas supplier noticed until he complained and it took another month to sort out, apparently there was no business logic or anomaly detection process for someone to think "There's been a colossal and abnormal spike in gas usage, let's investigate".
That same person has found there was a problem with recording the electrical readings and they don't know why, despite the same unit handling gas just fine. Still not fully resolved.
At my last place I had all manner of threatening marketing snottograms (and nothing truly official) from my supplier telling me to "ACT NOW" because of "government regulations" and it's a "legal requirement" to upgrade my meter because it was apparently end of life, which they say means it's broken and the numbers are obviously wrong. That's only partly true, the actual legislation doesn't really say what the electricity supplier claims it does. And in most rented properties you are simply not allowed to do that kind of work - at my last place it was a clear-cut violation of the tenancy agreement and explicitly prohibited.
How many of these being purged are technical or engineering roles? In my experience it seems that TA, marketing etc. are getting the chop to ostensibly save money, meanwhile they hire 150 engineers in bandwagon disciplines "to support our ambitious future plans" and all that guff. These new engineers are on bonkers pay.
Sounds like the usual mess of people who think that "security" is a case of locking something down so hard that it barely works.
Firstly, that's just lazy. Security is supposed to be a supporter and an enabler, so you design the policy fine-grained for the task at hand and those who need to use the system. Simply blocking everything is dumb.
Secondly, it can force people into desperate unapproved workarounds just to do their job. That circumvents all of your "hard work" and arguably just makes things worse.
It's entirely possible that MS will eventually begin moving things like DirectX over to Rust, especially if they also introduce Rust into the guts of the Xbox. Under those scenarios you will probably see more uptake amongst game developers.
That would be a major change, but likely a way off yet.
No doubt they'll be laying off HR, Marketing, Product/Project Managers... while re-hiring a very similar number of "engineers" and purely technical people "to support our customers and their journey of growth at pace" or other similar corporate burp.
Usually how it works. Meanwhile, I know someone who works in security at AWS and he's on track to have cleared his mortgage by 40.
The usual Bingo card for situations like this:
-> "sUpPLy aNd DeManD" - the laziest trope of them all. The blunt tool of armchair economists everywhere
-> "wE DoNt SeT oUr OwN PaY" - as if there's a masked cartel mob threatening your kids. Take this $100m bonus, these 250m shares and this 75% pay rise or they'll all die
-> "mONeY dOeSnT mOtIVaTe mE" - he says while sitting next to the outdoor Olympic-sized swimming pool at his $100m fourth home. Yet that's somehow less obnoxious than the multi-billionaire who "lives the simple life" sleeping in a shed and wearing old bin bags every day... but doesn't donate a bean of that vast wealth to anyone.
As of today I'm unable to search for anything on Twitter unless I'm logged in. Mobile also spits out errors when I even try to view a timeline.
If these changes are deliberate then that's it for me. If they're not, then it's another example of Twitter's wobbly reliability since Musk took over.
I remember a well-known student hall ISP which sold you various packages, all of which had limits on how many devices could be connected via the port in your room. It was likely just MAC-based port security with an address limit.
You weren't allowed to use any kind of switch or hub, for obvious reasons. However some bright spark rightly figured out that you could use such a device using modded firmware (DD-WRT, Tomato etc.) and mangle the hop count to bypass the NAT detection. I personally didn't do that (couldn't be bothered and not that keen), but it worked like a champ for those who did.
Security is a balancing act between usability and staying safe. Far too many people think that "security" is locking everything down to the point where it's squealing in pain and nothing works - in actual fact that can compound the problem as desperate people seek unapproved workarounds.
I've oft-compared using the cloud to be much like using takeaways and restaurants vs. cooking for yourself.
Sure, it's easier, you don't have to know how to cook, you can be lazy about it (up to a point), talented experts can come up with things you never imagined, you have outsourced your energy costs, and so on. But you pay a premium for it and are fully reliant on others to make it all work.
The key to this is the use of simple linguistic flair: you must have the skills to reword what the AI tells you in a way that sounds plausibly human. Use a thesaurus, change the word order, the punctuation, the voice, the tenses (if appropriate), contractions, possessives etc.
This - and simply referencing the legitimate sources at the bottom of the articles - was how we got around the Wikipedia 'ban' at university.
This really bothers me. Massive service issues, key systems broken, nay the squeak of a church mouse on the status page acknowledging the issue. Customers left in the pitch black not knowing what's going on.
Meanwhile, a status page has something utterly trivial from 8 days ago that was resolved in about five minutes.
Seen this far too often with too many companies and service provider, also happened with Google's AppEngine domain a week ago - was down for 18 hours, couldn't authenticate with a webapp we run, Google said nothing. Things like this are absolutely maddening.
This is the problem I'm seeing. The industry feels like a diode.
The 'tech' bandwagon is running at full speed and everyone wants to jump on. You see jewellery restorers and nurses "learning to code" or taking the CAPSLOCK course, you also see people fresh out of OxDurBridge with their degrees in Mesopotamian Basket Weaving & Cantonese Linguistics, who take a bootcamp and land themselves in a Backend Engineer position in the City or "Senior Partner Cloud Architecture Practice" with no hands-on experience whatsoever at a Big4. All by age 25.
But people who were already in the tech industry can't seem to get out. If you spent ten years writing Python or fiddling with Kubernetes, you can't have that Digital Marketing, HR, policing, or heating engineer role even if you genuinely do want to.
Got a friend in this exact position right now and he basically says don't study tech courses at degree level, kids. You can all too easily up in a pigeonhole and find everyone on the outside can have your job with generic qualifications, but you can't have their old jobs with your CS qualifications.
I was also very lucky. My commute was 15-20 minutes (traffic dependent) in the car and my journey took me near the likes of supermarkets, so I could run these errands on the way home or even a little later in the evening.
The idea of being on a train at 7am, having no evening because you're zonked and getting back late, then being able to run basic errands only at the weekend is alien to me. it also sounds utterly hellish and I have real sypmathy for people who have to do that.
I never did the whole London thing and to be honest at 35 years old I think I'm already well past it. Too old now.
The best bit is when you traipse in for 09:00 on a Monday, only to see a last minute "lolsorry had to cancel will reschedule" and your trip was a total waste of time. The meeting is later rearranged for 14:30 next Thursday.
Happy days.
I know someone who went through a discipline case for a £350 corporate charge card bill he didn't pay on time because of a cockup on the expenses claim. They eventually took the money out of payroll and the bill was settled.
Six weeks later they started the discipline process, with misconduct hearing. His MD demanded from HR (he was a senior MD and had clout) how much money had been spent on investigating something that had already been sorted - they came up with a figure of nearly 10x what the original now-paid bill was.
He gave them some blue air and warned them against that sort of nonsense in the future.
It's a common joke I've seen in the comments of YouTube videos about 'coding interviews be like' and so on.
Interview: use an online whiteboard to show us how to balance a Red-Black Splay Tree in O(n/3) amortized time. Then, assuming we have a circular buffer queue of n elements and you want to find how many times the letter "A" appears on the heap, how many apples were sold in Grantham last year?
Actual day job: Updating the test cases for org.FeckarseIndustries.Java.JavaClasses.JavaPackages.EnterpriseStuff.IEnterpriseFactory.IEnterpriseFactoryFactory.JankyRubbish.OldStuff - this was of course written in Java 5 back in 2010, long after Java 5 was EOSL.
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2025
