Contract...
I expect that Oracle's duty to maintain was voided when customer breached the contract with the licensing fraud.
531 publicly visible posts • joined 24 May 2010
If put in the position of responding to the app, respond No into the app. Now all the evidence in on your side. Don't refuse to respond to the app, because the evidence is then opaque again.
This doesn't stop the No person from 'dallying' of course, but forces the other party to trust that the No evidence won't be abused. No trust... well, probably shouldn't be a-cuddlin' anyway.
...that's it's Ireland's DPC that has steadfastly refused to prosecute FB under GDPR for 7 years now.
https://noyb.eu/en/irish-dpc-settles-judicial-review-and-agrees-decide-swiftly-facebooks-eu-us-transfers
There are tax haven countries, money laundering countries, and countries that refuse to apply the law to anchor companies. Let's call it 'lawndering'.
"The police WILL have records that they are not allowed to keep indefinitely and that will need to be permanently removed when certain criteria are met."
Nothing is ever permanently removed. Beat plods won't be allowed any visibility, sure. But senior police will probably be allowed to see that there was a record of something, and can get an ministerial exception to see the data. Cheltenham will keep everything, for ever. That's their job.
From Pikiwedia:
"Hurricane Harvey was a devastating Category 4 hurricane that made landfall on Texas and Louisiana in August 2017, causing catastrophic flooding and many deaths. It is tied with 2005's Hurricane Katrina as the costliest tropical cyclone on record, inflicting $125 billion (2017 USD) in damage, primarily from catastrophic rainfall-triggered flooding in the Houston metropolitan area and Southeast Texas."
https://image-us.samsung.com/SamsungUS/samsungbusiness/samsung-ads/resources/total-tv-watcher/samsung-ads-resources-2019-total-tv-watcher.pdf
"Samsung Ads has the industry’s largest Automatic Content Recognition (ACR) data set: nearly 60% of the U.S. ACR footprint. This unique, proprietary data creates unparalleled insights into consumer behavior in Advanced TV. This report, based on the 2019 Samsung Smart TV Viewer Behavior Study, shares important learnings and key implications for advertisers."
Nope. Nothing to do with NSLs, because they are an individualised legal warrant. Abused, sure...
From https://noyb.eu/en/next-steps-users-faqs :
...companies that fall under a US “mass surveillance” law can no longer use the SCCs . This is because the SCCs cannot override US law.
Transfers to US companies that fall under a US “mass surveillance” law like FISA 702 (also called 50 USC §1881a) are usually illegal. The companies that cannot rely on them are the so-called “electronic communication service providers”. This is a broad term under US law and covers most IT and cloud providers.
Examples of these providers include AT&T, Amazon (AWS), Apple, Cloudflare, Dropbox, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Verizon Media (known as Oath & Yahoo) or Verizon. The links of each of the companies will take you to their transparency reports that tell you how often they were subject to US government data access requests.
It's also interesting that the R. of I.'s DPC has been working closely with FB to avoid enforcing GDPR on FB. Even after this second judgement. Lots of detail on https://noyb.eu/en
Here's the letter from NOYB to Irish DPC after the DPC's recent prevarication:
https://noyb.eu/sites/default/files/2020-09/Letter%20to%20DPC_bk.pdf
EU data cannot be stored in US servers due to GDPR if the US gov can access it without any due process under 50 USC §1881a (FISA 702). Which is true for FB. So SCCs can't be used in this case either, because, again, the US gov can access it freely regardless.
https://noyb.eu/en/next-steps-users-faqs