Re: Possible motivation
Also being on orbit, harder to enforce, e.g. bypass the Great firewall as it could be satellite accessed.
1181 publicly visible posts • joined 24 May 2010
My interpretation of the table is that the Tensorflow isn't for training, but run-time operations.
When you've created your trained environment that is developed to run on this architecture, you can cut your on-going operating costs by using these as the equivalent power consumption is much, much lower.
If the system can function adequately in fixed point 8bit, then why not run it in that scenario. What is the point of wasting all that power and subsequently money for a field operable system that is adequate for the job.
Google have the resource to develop something like this and if it either allows them to increase functionality or save money or both, then they would probably invest in it.
Yes they could buy GPUs off the shelf, but just because something is available to do it this way does not necessarily mean it's the best solution for the job.
FPGA's are great at being flexible, but they are usually not very power efficient.
I get the impression you are looking at this from an academic/development environment perspective rather than a production environment perspective, which is where Google are operating these devices (assumed).
Boils down to 3 things:
1. Operating costs.
2. Customer Confidence.
3. Engineering cost for a radical concept.
A component of the Operating costs, is the cost of the Aircraft itself. If this was replaced with a new radical design, the engineering costs would be high and Customer confidence low. This will massively increase the cost of an Aircraft, increasing operating costs.
If the Aircraft were vastly more efficient e.g. 50%+, you may have some interest, but the operating costs have to show significant benefit before you will get custom.
Currently space is not an issue because there isn't many of them, get 2 million of them up there each needing to be at least a mile apart from each other and things change.
Also Air traffic control is stressful with the current setup, imagine people having to organise that many flying vehicles. Yes I know they would intend to automate it, but that is not currently the case.
"If more people were to rely on automated vehicles there'd be less privately owned cars sitting parked on the streets so more spaces."
Actually there won't...
People mainly use their cars for getting to and from work, this is where the peak demand will be, so if there are not enough cars available, someone is either going to buy there own or change jobs (because they were fired due to being either late or never arriving).
Now there could be some "rideshare" systems which may save a few cars, but I'd put money many (who could afford it) would be willing to pay extra not to have to sit in the vehicle with some stranger.
The Vehicle OEMs won't like their market being shortened, the bulk of the tech in vehicles is reused and margins are quite high, the evolution and competition will reduce costs.
Yes early autonomous vehicles will be expensive, just as pretty much all automotive tech trickles down.
It won't be a rental setup, but the cost of a taxi fare may go down.
Price rises when others are supplying a more cost effective product and an unwillingness to discount when presented with those options are the reason I left.
I was happy with the service, but I'm not paying through the nose for it.
I would suspect many others have left for the same reason.
In regards to the water conundrum, there are large swathes of water ice on Mars:
Which would suggest if the temperature were high enough it would be liquid.
Now what evidence do we have of the surface pressure of the atmosphere on Mars at that time?
The evidence presented suggests a low concentration of Carbon molecules in the atmosphere, but it does not state the pressure, which suggests we do not know.
It is widely suggested that the solar wind has stripped Mars of it's atmosphere.
If the atmospheric pressure was higher on Mars (potentially supported with ground sourced energy) it may have had liquid water, the observational evidence certainly suggests it did.
One gap is generally liability on the Sales droid/Turd Polisher side, they are generally liable only to the point of getting the business in, so they promise said customer Diamond encrusted Moon on a Golden stick. Involving unrealistic or unachievable technical goals, combined with unachievable and unrealistic deadlines.
Until there is liability on the delivery goals from the individuals/groups within the business that are responsible for the original agreement with the customer (without negative reflection on those groups due to unrealistic customer expectations), nothing will change.
Another gap is a general micro-management culture in certain businesses.
Work-Life balance.
Excessive Unpaid Overtime expectations. (This is generally due to the above unrealistic deadlines, resulting in a vicious circle of permanent fire fighting, which results in a highly stressed and unmotivated workforce).
Shifting responsibility down, while retaining authority above.
"People Jacking" resulting in the "Many Chiefs not enough Indians" behaviour.
Unrealistic Project Managers (i.e. the 9 Women can make a baby in 1 month types)
If no-one has noticed this is all related to his Mars project.
Electric cars - no freely available oxygen on Mars to run an ICE, so vehicles will need to be electric.
Solar Panels - Power the Mars Habitat.
Batteries - For vehicles above, in Space and on Mars.
Mars Habitat - Will probably have to be underground, so dig, hence digging company.
Hyperloop - Long Term Surface transport on Mars.
Awaiting something on either Hydroponics or Nuclear power.